Re: FBSD 8.0 And VirtualBox 3.1

2009-12-18 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On 12/18/2009 8:16 PM, Peter wrote: >> I have a machine running Win/XP Pro SP3 hosting VirtualBox 3.1. >> >> The hardware happily boots the Ubuntu amd64 CDROM natively and FreeBSD 8.0 >> also boots fine - well ... up to the point where it has to ID the hard >> drive, but that's another story. >> >>

Re: FBSD 8.0 And VirtualBox 3.1

2009-12-18 Thread Peter
> I have a machine running Win/XP Pro SP3 hosting VirtualBox 3.1. > > The hardware happily boots the Ubuntu amd64 CDROM natively and FreeBSD 8.0 > also boots fine - well ... up to the point where it has to ID the hard > drive, but that's another story. > > IOW, the hardware is 64-bit capable (It is

FBSD 8.0 And VirtualBox 3.1

2009-12-18 Thread Tim Daneliuk
I have a machine running Win/XP Pro SP3 hosting VirtualBox 3.1. The hardware happily boots the Ubuntu amd64 CDROM natively and FreeBSD 8.0 also boots fine - well ... up to the point where it has to ID the hard drive, but that's another story. IOW, the hardware is 64-bit capable (It is an Intel mo

Re: kern/141696: [rum] [panic] rum(4)+ vimage = kernel panic

2009-12-18 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Julian Elischer wrote: Hi Julian, Venture37 wrote: The following reply was made to PR kern/141696; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Venture37 To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ventur...@geeklan.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: kern/141696: [rum] [panic] rum(4)+ vimage = kernel panic