HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON
> > ugen3.10: > Conversion> at usbus3, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON
> > ugen3.11: > Conversion> at usbus3, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON
> >
> >
> > This is with a kernel from Oct 4th, i386. Any idea what
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:16:00AM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:49:59 -0700 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:56:12PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > >
> > > Weongyo is working on a usbdump utility to monitor ongoi
t.
2. In the USB process context it operates USB commands that most of
times it'd be blocked at least 125 us (it'd be always true for USB)
In a view of driver developer it'd be more convenient if USB stack has a
feature like this (timer supporting blocking).
regards,
W
rface names for each
ethernet devices are linux-style `ue[0-9]+'. The naming rule would
be kept at STABLE_8 but not sure at STABLE_9.
If no objections I'd like to see this patch at HEAD.
regards,
Weongyo Jeo
Hello,
As one of patch series it's for patching axe(4) without dependency of
uether module. The change log would be almost same like the previous
patch log.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: if_axereg.h
===
--- if_axereg.h (rev
parentheses.
Please reviews.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
Index: if_cdce.c
===
--- if_cdce.c (revision 214604)
+++ if_cdce.c (working copy)
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
#include
#include
#include
+#include
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:19:01 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > Hello USB guys,
> >
> > The following patch is to add a implementation, called `sleepout'.
> > Please reviews. I'd like to
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:30:25AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Sunday 31 October 2010 23:43:04 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > +static void
> > +axe_watchdog(void *arg)
> > +{
> > + struct axe_softc *sc = arg;
> > + struct ifnet *ifp = sc-&g
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:10:43AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Monday 01 November 2010 03:03:48 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > On Sunday 31 October 2010 01:19:01 Weongyo Jeong wrote:
>
patch looks almost you moved usb_process.c code into taskqueue(9)
that I means it still follows that a entry which enqueued at last should
be executed at last. It seems that at least it's not a general for
taskqueue(9). In my humble opinion it looks a trick. I think it'd
better to f
usb_pf
>
> usbdump -d -1 -vvv
>
> man usbdump
NACK. You already could recognize that the patch is quite big and
multiple patches are mixed into one. Please separate into smallest
pieces then send freebsd-usb@ again. I don't want to do a jumbo jump.
regards,
Weon
x27;t compatible.
- Just making the patch for BPF code, it looked like a trick or a hack
to me because I couldn't define what BPF should be.
- I could not define BPF exactly myself that what BPF should cover.
I agreed with that BPF is for ethernet packet filter
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 07:36:47PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 06:52:36PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 06:31 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > > [CC
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> >> - BPF was normally for ethernet frames (most operations were
> >> based on mbuf inclu
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:18 pm, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> >> - BPF was normally for ethernet frames (most operations were
> >> based on mbuf inclu
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:35:30PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On 24 November 2010 18:46, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 01:59:47PM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> >> On 24 November 2010 13:36, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 23 Novembe
king for a person to
port this from USB1 to USB2.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
u please elaborate it? IIRC NDIS's
approach to support Windows Binary and a approach to support Linux
Binary Compatibility are different. I'm not sure we can do it like what
the linuxulator is doing.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd
Hello,
Just for information. The code for supporting NDIS USB drivers has been
committed into HEAD. Please tell me if you encounter problems.
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 02:09:37AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >Just for information. The code for supporting NDIS USB drivers has been
> >committed into HEAD. Please tell me if you encounter problems.
> >
> >r
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 06:36:56PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
> Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just for information. The code for supporting NDIS USB drivers has been
> > committed into HEAD. Please tell me if you encounter problems.
> >
> Tried to co
yright (c) 2008 Weongyo Jeong
*
* Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
* purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
* copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS"
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:38:18PM +0800, Kevin Lo wrote:
> Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi Weongyo,
>
> > I would like to commit urtw(4) driver for supporting Realtek's 8187L
> > wireless chipset based on USB into HEAD by the end of the week if th
hat still require
> IFF_NEEDSGIANT some time before 8.0, probably starting with disabling them
> from the build in about 2-3 weeks).
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:37:57AM +, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
>
> >>As you know, I've been gradually working to eliminate all non-MPSAFE
> >>network device driver infrastructure for 8.0, having removed non-MPSAFE
>
here something I missed in here?
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-usb
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-usb-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:52:47AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > During porting uath(4) to usb2 I found the following code failed to run:
> >
> > data = open("/d
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:54:17PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:52:47AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 18 March 2009
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:01:23AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 19 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > ugen_default_read_callback:384: actlen=0, aframes=0
> > ugen_default_read_callback:384: actlen=0, aframes=0
> > ugen_read_clear_stall_callback:477: f=0xc4
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 02:32:23PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 19 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:01:23AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > > On Thursday 19 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > >
2_pause_mtx(NULL, 5 * hz);
...
uath_free_rx_data_list(sc);
uath_free_tx_data_list(sc);
uath_free_cmd_list(sc, sc->sc_cmd, UATH_CMD_LIST_COUNT);
After adding it I couldn't see `Memory modified after free' messages
anymore. My question is that I can't understand why adding
usb2_pause_mtx() h
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:46:54AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > Hello Hans :),
> >
> > I think porting uath(4) to usb almost have done that it works well to
> > associate with AP and for WPA but I'm suf
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:46:54AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > Hello Hans :),
> >
> > I think porting uath(4) to usb almost have done that it works well to
> > associate with AP and for WPA but I'm suf
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:02:02AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Thursday 26 March 2009, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:46:54AM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
> > > > To solve this problem I modified c
Hello Hans,
I have a simple question that is there a possibility for .mh.callback of
usb2_config to be called after usb2_transfer_unsetup()?
regards,
Weongyo Jeong
___
freebsd-usb@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
35 matches
Mail list logo
