On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Friday 30 July 2010 16:53:22 b. f. wrote:
> > Are these criticisms of suspend/resume for the usb stack justified?:
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2010-July/018974.html
> >
> > If so, are there any plans to fix the
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:19:21 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FreeBSD-9 works fine on this Lenovo T400 - except that suspending with
> no USB devices plugged in result in no ports working after resume.
>
> If I have a device plugged in during suspend - on any port - then all
> the port
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:07:22 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 21 June 2013 05:48, Ian Smith wrote:
>
> > No acpidump output on -stable or -acpi anyway .. likely best as an URL,
> > if it comes down to ACPI.
>
> Ok, I'll put it online in a sec.
Doubt I know en
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:53:43 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 26 June 2013 12:51, Lars Engels wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:09:20PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> [snip] ok, I'll do a boot -v tonight when I get home and log things.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >
> > Please also try a recent
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 27 June 2013 04:58, Ian Smith wrote:
> > We don't yet know if this is a bus, ACPI &/or USB issue. Home yet? :)
>
> Yup:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/usb/
>
> dmesg.boot = dmesg at startup
&g
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 15:02:57 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 30 June 2013 07:22, Ian Smith wrote:
[..]
> > Nothing of note that I can see, if that usb hub-to-bus remapping is
> > normal. As you said, 'CPU0: local APIC error 0x40' looks maybe sus.
> > Maybe som
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 03:26:24 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 03:51:12PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 15:02:57 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > On 30 June 2013 07:22, Ian Smith wrote:
> > [..]
> > > > Nothing of
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:47:03 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 7 July 2013 13:49, Lars Engels wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 03:02:57PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> On 30 June 2013 07:22, Ian Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> > After removing [numbers] (f
