Re: usb/106435: Possible buffer overflow in dev/usb/ums.c

2006-12-09 Thread Markus Brueffer
Synopsis: Possible buffer overflow in dev/usb/ums.c Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-usb->markus Responsible-Changed-By: markus Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Dec 9 13:08:55 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: I'll handle this one. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=106435 _

Re: usb/106435: Possible buffer overflow in dev/usb/ums.c

2006-12-08 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
The following reply was made to PR usb/106435; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: usb/106435: Possible buffer overflow in dev/usb/ums.c Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 14:40:36 +0300 Sorry, miss

Re: usb/106435: Possible buffer overflow in dev/usb/ums.c

2006-12-08 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
Sorry, missed the double quote in the patch. The real patch should be: --- ums.c.orig Tue Dec 5 13:29:34 2006 +++ ums.c Tue Dec 5 13:31:40 2006 @@ -431,9 +431,10 @@ #define UMS_BUT(i) ((i) < 3 ? (((i) + 2) % 3) : (i)) DPRINTFN(5, ("ums_intr: sc=%p status=%d\n", sc, status)); -

usb/106435: Possible buffer overflow in dev/usb/ums.c

2006-12-06 Thread Eygene Ryabinkin
>Number: 106435 >Category: usb >Synopsis: Possible buffer overflow in dev/usb/ums.c >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible:freebsd-usb >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: