On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 12:43:06PM -0800, Richard Neese wrote:
> Point and Fax I have emaile Sobomax about fixing and updating the asterisk
> ports. and have sent patches but never got a reply in 9 months.
For situations like this you need to email [EMAIL PROTECTED] We already have
defined para
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Henrik Gulbrandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 11:48 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Henrik Gulbrandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : Look at it from my perspective: I would be h
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 11:48 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Henrik Gulbrandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Look at it from my perspective: I would be happy to complete my fix for
> : the infamous five-year-old usb/46176, so people can finally detach
I agree with this and there is also the 2nd issue of commiters not responding
to those working on updating ports.
Point and Fax I have emaile Sobomax about fixing and updating the asterisk
ports. and have sent patches but never got a reply in 9 months.
If your going to be a maintainer you nee
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Henrik Gulbrandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Look at it from my perspective: I would be happy to complete my fix for
: the infamous five-year-old usb/46176, so people can finally detach umass
: devices without having to manually unmount them first. Ho
Mark and Henrik make a number of good points here. Rather than reply
to the details, I'm going to make a couple of quick observations.
As a project we're not leveraging the community sufficiently when it
comes to contributions. The current system of patch review and
submission is very hap-hazard
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 06:15:16PM +0100, Henrik Gulbrandsen wrote:
> Fixing and merging are good, but it seems to me (as an occasional patch
> contributor without commit privileges) that the bottleneck for USB is
> still in the handling of incoming patches [...] if a one-line fix
> such as that in
On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 00:35 -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : If we want people to give FreeBSD a try in good faith, it is both
> profoundly
> : stupid and dishonest on our part to claim, we have a working
Below was info when the reader was connected already with the
troublesome SD card inserted.
Here's info when the same reader is connected without any media:
demsg:
umass0: Generic Mass Storage Device, rev 2.00/1.26, addr 2
da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-
