On 2013/01/08 02:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Below is the forward of the patch for which I failed to obtain a private
review. Might be, the list generates more responses.
Our rtld has a performance bootleneck, typically exposed by the images
with the lot of the run-time relocation processing,
On 2013/01/11 17:54, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 08:22:35PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Below is the forward of the patch for which I failed to obtain a private
review. Might be, the list generates more responses.
Our rtld has a performance bootleneck, typically exp
On 2013/01/12 07:29, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:49:38PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/rtld-sigblock.3.patch
> The new fields td_sigblock_ptr and td_sigblock_val are in the part that
> is zeroed for new threads, while the code in rt
urrent mutex-is-a-pointer implementation
> depends on the virtual address space of the creator, and so does not work if
> the mutex is created in a shared memory segment.
>
> Yes, David Xu has a p4 branch with this done already. My point is that I
> would rather effort be spent
