On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 26 Mar 2017, at 23:36, Mark Millard wrote:
> > ...
> > Also interesting was:
> >
> > Installed packages to be REMOVED:
> > llvm40-4.0.0.r4
> >
> > Number of packages to be removed: 1
> >
> > The operation will free 49 GiB.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:26:43PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote:
> LLVM 3.8 introduced the option to build a shared LLVM library, which is
> what Mesa needs for use at runtime (for e.g. compiling shaders), separate
> from linking to it. Previous versions only had one option, if the library
> was buil
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:12:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 05/04/2017 ?? 18:15, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit :
> > ...
> > That 1G looks like a big jump from 259M of llvm39-3.9.1_1.txz to me.
>
> So, you are comparing the size of the llvm39 package with the size
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 08:46:22PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 05/04/2017 ?? 19:20, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit :
> > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:12:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> >> Le 05/04/2017 ?? 18:15, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit :
> >>> ...
> >>&g
Sorry Matthew, forgot to reply to this one.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:01:35PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 April 2017 16:15:41 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > ...
> > Hmm, I don't quite get it: shouldn't static linking actually increase
> > the binar