Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example)

2017-03-30 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:41:40AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 26 Mar 2017, at 23:36, Mark Millard wrote: > > ... > > Also interesting was: > > > > Installed packages to be REMOVED: > > llvm40-4.0.0.r4 > > > > Number of packages to be removed: 1 > > > > The operation will free 49 GiB.

Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example)

2017-04-05 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:26:43PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote: > LLVM 3.8 introduced the option to build a shared LLVM library, which is > what Mesa needs for use at runtime (for e.g. compiling shaders), separate > from linking to it. Previous versions only had one option, if the library > was buil

Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example)

2017-04-05 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:12:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 05/04/2017 ?? 18:15, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit : > > ... > > That 1G looks like a big jump from 259M of llvm39-3.9.1_1.txz to me. > > So, you are comparing the size of the llvm39 package with the size

Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example)

2017-04-06 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 08:46:22PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Le 05/04/2017 ?? 19:20, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit : > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:12:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> Le 05/04/2017 ?? 18:15, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit : > >>> ... > >>&g

Re: FYI: what it takes for RAM+swap to build devel/llvm40 with 4 processors or cores and WITH__DEBUG= (powerpc64 example)

2017-04-15 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
Sorry Matthew, forgot to reply to this one. On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:01:35PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote: > On Wednesday 05 April 2017 16:15:41 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > ... > > Hmm, I don't quite get it: shouldn't static linking actually increase > > the binar