https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223415
Jean-Sébastien Pédron changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |In Progress
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223415
--- Comment #8 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: jbeich
Date: Mon Nov 27 22:02:30 UTC 2017
New revision: 454995
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/454995
Log:
lang/rust: avoid LLVM target
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223415
Jan Beich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Closed
Resolution|---
I'd like to build www/firefox with both DTrace and LTO support. Both
Clang and GCC emit code that dtrace(1) doesn't understand.
$ cat main.c
#include
#include
int main()
{
DTRACE_PROBE(test, foo);
sleep(300);
return 0;
}
$ cat test.d
provider test {
probe foo();
};
$ clang50 -fl
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:34:00AM +0100, Jan Beich wrote:
> I'd like to build www/firefox with both DTrace and LTO support. Both
> Clang and GCC emit code that dtrace(1) doesn't understand.
Unfortunately, both gcc and clang's LTO implementations are completely
incompatible with the way that dtrac
