Re: lang/gcc* package builds vs. release/11.0.1/ and the future release/11.1.0 because of vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t changes and how the lang/gcc* work

Hi everyone, I am testing a patch for gcc5-devel right now that will disable fixincludes (or rather its fixed files) being packaged. Should that work fine for you, I will push this back to gcc5 the following days. That said, the change that triggered this is what I would expect on CURRENT, not

Re: lang/gcc* package builds vs. release/11.0.1/ and the future release/11.1.0 because of vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t changes and how the lang/gcc* work

On 2017-Jun-28, at 3:21 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > I am testing a patch for gcc5-devel right now that will disable fixincludes > (or rather its fixed files) being packaged. > > Should that work fine for you, I will push this back to gcc5 the following > days. > > That said, the change that t

/usr/ports -r444615 (e.g.) & head -r320458 (e.g.): sysutils/u-boot-pine64 build fails for arch/arm/dts/pine64_plus.dtb source handling error (gic in a64.dtsi)

Is the below a BSDL vs. GPL DTS issue? In my attempt to build sysutils/u-boot-pine64 I got: OBJCOPY u-boot.srec OBJCOPY u-boot-nodtb.bin start=$(aarch64-none-elf-nm u-boot | grep __rel_dyn_start | cut -f 1 -d ' '); end=$(aarch64-none-elf-nm u-boot | grep __rel_dyn_end | cut -f 1 -d ' '); to

Re: /usr/ports -r444615 (e.g.) & head -r320458 (e.g.): sysutils/u-boot-pine64 build fails for arch/arm/dts/pine64_plus.dtb source handling error (gic in a64.dtsi)

On 2017-Jun-28, at 7:44 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > Is the below a BSDL vs. GPL DTS issue? > > In my attempt to build sysutils/u-boot-pine64 I got: > > OBJCOPY u-boot.srec > OBJCOPY u-boot-nodtb.bin > start=$(aarch64-none-elf-nm u-boot | grep __rel_dyn_start | cut -f 1 -d ' '); > end=$(aarch64