Here's a fresh update on LLVM's LLD linker in the base system,
referencing the plan originally posted at the beginning of 2016. This
work is primarily taking place on amd64 right now, and unless
otherwise noted these results apply to amd64.
First, the completed items:
> 1. Update lld along with t
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:26:43PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote:
> LLVM 3.8 introduced the option to build a shared LLVM library, which is
> what Mesa needs for use at runtime (for e.g. compiling shaders), separate
> from linking to it. Previous versions only had one option, if the library
> was buil
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:15:41PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > I've also tried without WITH_DEBUG= and now. . .
> >
> > # pkg delete llvm40
> > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
> > Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0
> > packages in the universe):
On Wednesday 05 April 2017 16:15:41 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:26:43PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote:
> > LLVM 3.8 introduced the option to build a shared LLVM library, which is
> > what Mesa needs for use at runtime (for e.g. compiling shaders), separate
> > from linking to
Le 05/04/2017 à 18:15, Alexey Dokuchaev a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:26:43PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote:
>> LLVM 3.8 introduced the option to build a shared LLVM library, which is
>> what Mesa needs for use at runtime (for e.g. compiling shaders), separate
>> from linking to it. Previous
On Wednesday 05 April 2017 19:44:51 Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 04:15:41PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > I've also tried without WITH_DEBUG= and now. . .
> > >
> > > # pkg delete llvm40
> > > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
> > > Deinstallation has been re
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:12:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Le 05/04/2017 ?? 18:15, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit :
> > ...
> > That 1G looks like a big jump from 259M of llvm39-3.9.1_1.txz to me.
>
> So, you are comparing the size of the llvm39 package with the size of
> the llvm40 after extrac
Le 05/04/2017 à 19:20, Alexey Dokuchaev a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:12:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> Le 05/04/2017 ?? 18:15, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit :
>>> ...
>>> That 1G looks like a big jump from 259M of llvm39-3.9.1_1.txz to me.
>> So, you are comparing the size of the llvm39
On 5 Apr 2017, at 16:59, Ed Maste wrote:
>
> Here's a fresh update on LLVM's LLD linker in the base system,
> referencing the plan originally posted at the beginning of 2016. This
> work is primarily taking place on amd64 right now, and unless
> otherwise noted these results apply to amd64.
>
>
On 5 April 2017 at 16:09, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> Note that as of r316432, all of the above is also available in the
> stable/11 branch.
However some of the changes to FreeBSD haven't yet been merged to
stable/11, and it's probably not possible to build world + kernel with
LLD (via WITH_LLD_IS_
On 2017-Apr-5, at 10:20 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:12:06PM +0200, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>> Le 05/04/2017 ?? 18:15, Alexey Dokuchaev a ??crit :
>>> ...
>>> That 1G looks like a big jump from 259M of llvm39-3.9.1_1.txz to me.
>>
>> So, you are comparing the size of t
11 matches
Mail list logo
