https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187437
Tijl Coosemans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Issue Resolved |Open
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187437
Roman Divacky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdiva...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187437
Konstantin Belousov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187437
--- Comment #6 from Roman Divacky ---
Ah, it reproduces with clang3.4 -m32. It seems to be fixed with clang3.5
though. So I guess the solution for this bug is to import clang3.5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
On 13 Sep 2014, at 20:52, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On 13.09.2014 22:30, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>>> By first glance I see a lots of things. It is known that
>>> in edge cases gcc preserves more "unused" values than clang. It can be
>>> the possible case. I'll try to lower -O level preserving -march=
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187437
Dimitry Andric changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@freebsd.org
Assign
