Re: Apple's GCC 42 enhancements (was Re: [CFT] Experimental gcc update).

2014-01-02 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Heloo and Happy New Year! On 24.11.2013 07:54, David Chisnall wrote: On 23 Nov 2013, at 22:11, Pedro Giffuni wrote: I have particular interest in -fwritable-strings and the block support, mostly with the idea of making our gcc somewhat more compatible to clang. I would absolutely love to see

Re: Apple's GCC 42 enhancements (was Re: [CFT] Experimental gcc update).

2014-01-02 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On 02.01.2014 15:22, Pedro Giffuni wrote: Heloo and Happy New Year! On 24.11.2013 07:54, David Chisnall wrote: On 23 Nov 2013, at 22:11, Pedro Giffuni wrote: I have particular interest in -fwritable-strings and the block support, mostly with the idea of making our gcc somewhat more compatibl

Re: [CFT] Update to clang 3.4

2014-01-02 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 02 Jan 2014, at 01:11, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 01 Jan 2014, at 23:37, Warner Losh wrote: >> I'd add to the list the upgrade path (from 9.x, 10.x and current) as well, >> just to make sure they all still work... If there are problems with the 9.x >> upgrade path, we'll need to call them ou

Re: Apple's GCC 42 enhancements (was Re: [CFT] Experimental gcc update).

2014-01-02 Thread David Chisnall
On 2 Jan 2014, at 20:22, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > The behaviour is consistent with llvm-gcc though, as explained here: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-gcc-4.2/+bug/483679 > > " looking at the LLVM/Clang documentation > (http://clang.llvm.org/doxygen/InitPreprocessor_8cpp-sourc

Re: [CFT] Update to clang 3.4

2014-01-02 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 02 Jan 2014, at 22:36, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 02 Jan 2014, at 01:11, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 01 Jan 2014, at 23:37, Warner Losh wrote: >>> I'd add to the list the upgrade path (from 9.x, 10.x and current) as well, >>> just to make sure they all still work... If there are problems wit