On May 27, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> On 27.05.2013 14:12, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> On 27 May 2013, at 09:41, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>
>>> Hello;
>>>
>>> Almost a year ago I tried to bring in the support for AMD's barcelona
>>> chipset into our gcc. This actually filled a lot of holes
On May 27, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> On 27.05.2013 14:38, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On May 27, 2013, at 21:12, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>> On 27 May 2013, at 09:41, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Almost a year ago I tried to bring in the support for AMD's barcelona
chipset into our gcc.
On 28.05.2013 12:41, Warner Losh wrote:
On May 27, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
On 27.05.2013 14:38, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On May 27, 2013, at 21:12, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 27 May 2013, at 09:41, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
Almost a year ago I tried to bring in the support for AMD's barcel
On 28 May 2013, at 18:40, Warner Losh wrote:
> That's not going to happen soon. While it works OK for amd64, there's still
> many bugs in its ARM support and even more in its MIPS support. There's 0
> chance it will be gone in 10...
I disagree. There is a significant chance that gcc in base w
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:10:23PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 28 May 2013, at 18:40, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > That's not going to happen soon. While it works OK for amd64, there's still
> > many bugs in its ARM support and even more in its MIPS support. There's 0
> > chance it will be go
On 28 May 2013, at 12:54, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:10:23PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
>> On 28 May 2013, at 18:40, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>>> That's not going to happen soon. While it works OK for amd64, there's still
>>> many bugs in its ARM support and even more in it
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 01:01:00PM -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 28 May 2013, at 12:54, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:10:23PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
> >> On 28 May 2013, at 18:40, Warner Losh wrote:
> >>
> >>> That's not going to happen soon. While it works OK for amd
On May 28, 2013, at 12:10 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 28 May 2013, at 18:40, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>> That's not going to happen soon. While it works OK for amd64, there's still
>> many bugs in its ARM support and even more in its MIPS support. There's 0
>> chance it will be gone in 10...
>
on 28/05/2013 21:10 David Chisnall said the following:
> On 28 May 2013, at 18:40, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>> That's not going to happen soon. While it works OK for amd64, there's still
>> many bugs in its ARM support and even more in its MIPS support. There's 0
>> chance it will be gone in 10...
>
