On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:09:51PM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> On 2013/01/08 02:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Below is the forward of the patch for which I failed to obtain a private
> > review. Might be, the list generates more responses.
> >
> > Our rtld has a performance bootleneck, typically
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:21:48AM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On 1/7/13 7:08 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:42:01PM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >> On 1/7/13 1:22 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >>> Below is the forward of the patch for which I failed to ob
On 1/8/13 9:56 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 01:09:51PM +0800, David Xu wrote:
On 2013/01/08 02:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Below is the forward of the patch for which I failed to obtain a private
review. Might be, the list generates more responses.
Our rtld has a p
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:02:22AM -0500, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> I think it would be great if it works, I just haven't had time to fully
> understand your more recent patch. If you feel it's safe and maybe do a
> few test programs to see what happens, that would be best.
I revived the test p
