Re: More kernel performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-22 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Hi all, > > As a followup to my previous post about the performance of FreeBSD 10.0 > kernels compiled with different compilers (clang and gcc), I did another > series of tests, now on a more modern machine (Core i5-based). I also

Re: More kernel performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-22 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-09-22 09:35, O. Hartmann wrote: Am 09/21/12 23:39, schrieb Dimitry Andric: ... At least one can say FreeBSD does not suffer from performance drain using the cutting edge clang 3.2 compared with a gcc 4.2.1 compiler, the echo from the past. Well, the main idea of these tests is to prov

Re: More kernel performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-22 Thread O. Hartmann
Hello Dimitry. Am 09/22/12 13:43, schrieb Dimitry Andric: > On 2012-09-22 09:35, O. Hartmann wrote: >> Am 09/21/12 23:39, schrieb Dimitry Andric: > ... >> At least one can say FreeBSD does not suffer from performance drain >> using the cutting edge clang 3.2 compared with a gcc 4.2.1 compiler, th

Re: More kernel performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-22 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-09-22 14:52, O. Hartmann wrote: ... When we used FreeBSD for scientific work, that was around 1998 - 2002, there were some attempts made to use Intel's icc compiler suite on FreeBSD in the 32Bit Linuxulator. That time I used that compiler only for compiling my modelling software, but ther

Re: More kernel performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-22 Thread O. Hartmann
Am 09/22/12 15:52, schrieb Dimitry Andric: > On 2012-09-22 14:52, O. Hartmann wrote: > ... >> When we used FreeBSD for scientific work, that was around 1998 - 2002, >> there were some attempts made to use Intel's icc compiler suite on >> FreeBSD in the 32Bit Linuxulator. That time I used that compi

Re: More kernel performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

2012-09-22 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:20:14PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As a followup to my previous post about the performance of FreeBSD 10.0 > > kernels compiled with different compilers (clang and gcc), I did an

Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program

2012-09-22 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hello, > I've been a bit busy working on porting over ATF from NetBSD, and > one of the pieces that's currently not available in FreeBSD that's > available in NetBSD is the ability to understand and compile multiple > programs. In order

Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program

2012-09-22 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message > > , Garrett Cooper writes: > >>Without the change: >> >>$ python calc_runtime.py bw.*_without.log | ministat -w 72 >>[...] >>$ python calc_runtime.py bw.*.log | ministat -w 72 > > Try: >python calc_runtime.py bw.*_with