On 29 Jul 2017, at 17:55, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> The demangler in libcxxrt is indeed rather old, and we should replace it
> with something newer. I'm not sure if the demangler of libc++abi is the
> right one yet, since upstream seems to still be discussing which of
> their three (or thereabou
On 29 Jul 2017, at 18:14, Oleg Lelchuk wrote:
>
> libcxxrt seems to lack some features that are present in libc++abi. If I
> compile this code and link it against libcxxrt:
>
> #include
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
>int&& ref{4};
&g
libcxxrt seems to lack some features that are present in libc++abi. If I
compile this code and link it against libcxxrt:
#include
#include
int main()
{
int&& ref{4};
std::cout <<
boost::typeindex::type_id_with_cvr().pretty_name() <<
std::endl;
}
Then I get
