Re: GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc)

2013-08-23 Thread Thomas Mueller
> As for me I expect something like this: > . 9.x gcc default and clang in base; > . 10.x clang default and gcc in base; > . 11.x gcc withdraw. There is also the concern whether clang in base will reliably build gcc required for some ports, and then there are those CPU architectures for which cl

Re: GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc)

2013-08-23 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:02:18PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 23.08.2013 13:16, David Chisnall ??: > >> I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code >> slush that removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build >> on platforms where clang is the system compiler. We de

Re: GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc)

2013-08-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Aug 23, 2013, at 7:54 AM, David Chisnall wrote: > On 23 Aug 2013, at 14:52, Warner Losh wrote: >> No. That breaks non x86 architecutres. gcc must remain in base for now, or >> there's no bootstrap ability. Nobody has done the lifting to cleanly >> integrate gcc as a port into buildworld, alt

Re: GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc)

2013-08-23 Thread David Chisnall
On 23 Aug 2013, at 14:52, Warner Losh wrote: > No. That breaks non x86 architecutres. gcc must remain in base for now, or > there's no bootstrap ability. Nobody has done the lifting to cleanly > integrate gcc as a port into buildworld, althogh Brooks' work gets us most of > the way there. We'

Re: GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc)

2013-08-23 Thread Warner Losh
On Aug 23, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >>> I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code >>> slush that removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build on >>> platforms where clang is the system compiler. We definitely don't >>> want to be supporting our 6-year-o

Re: GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc)

2013-08-23 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code > > slush that removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build on > > platforms where clang is the system compiler. We definitely don't > > want to be supporting our 6-year-old versions of these for the > > lifetime of the 10.x

GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc)

2013-08-23 Thread Boris Samorodov
23.08.2013 13:16, David Chisnall пишет: > I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code slush that > removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build on platforms where clang is > the system compiler. We definitely don't want to be supporting our > 6-year-old versions of these fo