On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:16:03AM -0600, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Damjan Marion wrote:
> > I see 3 options to fix this:
> >
> > 1. Ask clang folks to patch llvm to use old mnemonics ("mov r0, r0, rrx"
> > instead of "rrx r0,r0")
> > 2. Maintain same patch for freebsd only
>
On Jun 25, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Damjan Marion wrote:
>> I see 3 options to fix this:
>>
>> 1. Ask clang folks to patch llvm to use old mnemonics ("mov r0, r0, rrx"
>> instead of "rrx r0,r0")
>> 2. Maintain same patch for freebsd only
>> 3. patch binuti
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Damjan Marion wrote:
> I see 3 options to fix this:
>
> 1. Ask clang folks to patch llvm to use old mnemonics ("mov r0, r0, rrx"
> instead of "rrx r0,r0")
> 2. Maintain same patch for freebsd only
> 3. patch binutils to support this new mnemonics
4. Finally upgrade to a m
On Jun 25, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Damjan Marion wrote:
>> I see 3 options to fix this:
>>
>> 1. Ask clang folks to patch llvm to use old mnemonics ("mov r0, r0, rrx"
>> instead of "rrx r0,r0")
>> 2. Maintain same patch for freebsd only
>> 3. patch binuti
On Jun 22, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> I'd be inclined to include a small patch to FreeBSD's binutils to implement
> this. You might be able to snag it from a newer version of binutils if you
> can track down the author of that code and ask if you can include it in a
> GPLv2 versio
On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:30 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Ryan Stone wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> I'd be inclined to include a small patch to FreeBSD's binutils to implement
>>> this. You might be able to snag it from a newer ve
On Jun 22, 2011, at 10:42 AM, Ryan Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
>> I'd be inclined to include a small patch to FreeBSD's binutils to implement
>> this. You might be able to snag it from a newer version of binutils if you
>> can track down the author of t
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> I'd be inclined to include a small patch to FreeBSD's binutils to implement
> this. You might be able to snag it from a newer version of binutils if you
> can track down the author of that code and ask if you can include it in a
> GPLv2 ve
I'd be inclined to include a small patch to FreeBSD's binutils to implement
this. You might be able to snag it from a newer version of binutils if you can
track down the author of that code and ask if you can include it in a GPLv2
version of binutils.
Warner
On Jun 22, 2011, at 7:09 AM, Damja
Hi,
On my ongoing effort to support clang cross-compiling of world for ARM
architecture I hit one weird issue:
Problem is that old ARM Architecture Reference Manual (ARMv5) specifies
mnemonics "mov r0, r0, rrx"
while new ARM ARM defines same instruction as "rrx r0,r0".
Both have same opcode
10 matches
Mail list logo
