On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:21 AM Gleb Popov wrote:
> Indeed, this looks like a culprit! When compiling using first command line
> (the long one) I get following warnings:
>
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/ghc/work/ghc-8.10.1/libraries/ghc-prim/cbits/atomic.c:369:10:
> warning: misaligned atomic operatio
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 1:52 AM Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:56:35 +0400 Gleb Popov wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 7:43 PM Konstantin Belousov
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I do not believe there were any change in the toolchain between p2 and
> p7,
> > > this is more likely indicate
On Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:56:35 +0400 Gleb Popov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 7:43 PM Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
>
> > I do not believe there were any change in the toolchain between p2 and p7,
> > this is more likely indicates some fluctuation in the build. The only
> > change that could be
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 03:56:35PM +0400, Gleb Popov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 7:43 PM Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
>
> > I do not believe there were any change in the toolchain between p2 and p7,
> > this is more likely indicates some fluctuation in the build. The only
> > change that cou
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 4:37 PM Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 15:36:51 +0400 Gleb Popov wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 5:30 PM Konstantin Belousov
> > wrote:
> >> For code generated by gcc or clang, yes.
> >> If the reference to the symbol was generated by ghc, then I do not know.
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 7:43 PM Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
> I do not believe there were any change in the toolchain between p2 and p7,
> this is more likely indicates some fluctuation in the build. The only
> change that could be even remotely declared as possibly related is
> EN-20:10.build r36
