Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th

2012-09-14 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 05:18:08PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > A third class of failure appears to be that clang emits > i387 fpu instructions for at least sinf and cosf instead > of calls to the library routines. AFAIK, the library > routines are faster and more accurate. > Yep. Clang has p

Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th

2012-09-14 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:23:19PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:10:24AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > ok 1 - cexp zero > > Abort trap (core dumped) > > *** [tests] Error code 134 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/tools/regression/lib/msun. > > Prompted by this post, I did a bit

Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th

2012-09-14 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:10:24AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:32:12AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 19:08 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > In regards to my initial post in this thread, I was just trying > > > to assess whether any benchmarks have been