Re: ipfw drop syn+fin

2001-02-23 Thread simond
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 10:34:57AM +, Alex Hayward wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Tom wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > > > > > # TCP_DROP_SYNFIN adds support for ignoring TCP packets with SYN+FIN. This > > > # prevents nmap et al. from identifying the TC

Problem with top in todays stable

2001-03-06 Thread simond
Despite having my kernel and world in sync (and trying rebuilting top seperately), I always get "top: nlist failed" error message, this is from a cvsup from a couple of hours ago, I haven't tried cvsuping again yet mainly as I have to work on this machine too. Anyone know if this has been fixed?

Re: Problem with top in todays stable

2001-03-06 Thread simond
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 08:18:39AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: > >Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 16:12:15 + > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Despite having my kernel and world in sync (and trying rebuilting top > >seperately), I always get "top: nlist failed" error message, this is from > >a cvsup fr

Re: Problem with top in todays stable

2001-03-06 Thread simond
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:20:55AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > At 04:12 PM 3/6/01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Despite having my kernel and world in sync (and trying rebuilting top > >seperately), I always get "top: nlist failed" error message, this is from > >a cvsup from a couple of hou

Re: Problem with top in todays stable

2001-03-07 Thread simond
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 07:26:09PM +0100, Olgerik Albers wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 04:35:17PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >d On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:20:55AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > > > > At 04:12 PM 3/6/01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >Despite having my k

Re: Irda support

2000-08-03 Thread simond
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 02:25:46PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > In list.freebsd-stable Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Or give them a real business card.. > > > > Still, hotsync'ing via IR is neat :) > > If I'm not mistaken, the IR feature of the Palm (at least > the Palm III)

Problems with installing 4.1-RELEASE

2000-09-02 Thread simond
Hiya, is there any reason why "flags 0x1" got added to the atkbd0 line somewhere between 4.0 and 4.1? I'm asking as when I was trying to install 4.1-RELEASE it wasn't recognising the keyboard, installing with 4.0-RELEASE worked, after which I tried cvsuping to 4.1-STABLE which still didn't work.