Andre
I'll try to do it today or next monday when I get back from vacation . They
are all hp branded nic's . I ordered them with in the last few years to use in
place of bce nic's on the main boards of hp servers .
---
On Nov 14, 2012, at 5:31 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Hello
>
> I cur
niversity
> ___
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
---
Mark saad | mark.s...@longcount.org
any updates in e-mail, but the
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html
>
> url has been updated. Its a litle out of date now (last update about 2
> weeks ago), but it does include information on the release of 9.1 and what
> is holding it up (specifically gettin
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:18:44AM -0500, Mark Saad wrote:
> the ISO are on the master server
The release is official when, and only when, a signed email from the
release engineering team says that it is.
In a past release cycle there was indeed a last-minute fix that had
to be made after
Try running diskinfo -t /dev/...
If it says your device is really slow it's probably dying. I'd suspect it's
having trouble seeking.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, sen
dumps
somewhere and include a URL to them in a followup to the PR.
Thanks.
Mark Linimon, on behalf of bugmeister
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 06:02:33PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> > Seeing 9.1-RELEASE instead 9.1-PRERELASE
> > or 9.1-RC4 is also a bad suprise for me...
>
> I assume it does not look like release is the lack
> of packages.
What you are seeing is behind-the-scenes preparation.
The release is offi
In an ideal world, the bits that will almost certainly become FreeBSD 9.1
would not appear on the masters, or any of the mirrors, until the same
instant that the release announcement is set to freebsd-annou...@freebsd.org.
In practice this doesn't happen. If there is some clever way for that to
h
On Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:30:48 -0800
Greg Bonett wrote:
> That's a good idea - but the zpool is made of geli devices. Illumos can't
> attached FreeBSD geli devices can it?
Export the raw geli devices over iSCSI and assemble the zpool on Illumos that
way :)
_
stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742
e new features of IPv6 socket
api like packet info so that the application doesn't need to remember
if it is talking to a IPv4 or IPv6 destination.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:22:26 -0600, Alex Povolotsky
wrote:
On 12/22/12 13:25, Mark Felder wrote:
Try running diskinfo -t /dev/...
If it says your device is really slow it's probably dying. I'd suspect
it's having trouble seeking.
It was a break-in. Some dumb php scri
ailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>
--
mark saad | nones...@longcount.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:15:02AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> Not unless you consider adding new functions in a reserved namespace
> (str*) to be ABI breakage.
Well, what often happens is that when we add new functions, ports break.
I think deciding whether this is or is not "ABI breakage" is se
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:53:03AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> I'm not sure why I'm being jumped on in this weeks old report of a
> now-fixed problem.
I'm sorry, I'm that far behind in email. I did not realize the problem
had already been solved.
More often than not the problem is simply "throw
e.
Cheers,
Mark Blackman
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:52:42PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> You can do this, it will work for most of the ports but some ports do
> not honor CFLAGS.
Ports that don't honor CFLAGS are broken ports. Having said that,
the last time I ran a script that looked for them (and other things
like CX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/20/2013 11:36, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a bunch of FreeBSDs that hangs (and I really want to do
> something to fight this). May be it's the zfs or may be it's the pf
> (I also have a bunch of really stable ones, so it's hard to
nfiguration:
SettingCurrentLimit
Thread count 11
Default queue limit25610240
Dispatch policy direct n/a
Threads bound to CPUs disabled n/a
Am I missing somethi
t; On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Mark Saad wrote:
>>
>> All
>> I am looking for some guidance on how to turn netisr back on, on a
>> 9.1-RELEASE and 9.1-STABLE box. It looks it stopped working as it did in
>> prior versions of FreeBSD .
>> I tested this on 9.
direct n/a
> Threads bound to CPUs enabled n/a
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
>>
>> You're right. I was looking at different net.isr oids, not the _direct
>> ones. My bad.
>>
&
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Mark Saad wrote:
>>
>> Freddie
>>So should I be adjusting the numbers of threads or is this
>> determined somewhere ?
>>
> I think it's supposed to be automatic,
---
On Mar 11, 2013, at 9:20 PM, "Michael Ross" wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400
>> Patrick McEvoy wrote:
>>> Hello John,
>>> This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time / inclination, would
>>> you like to d
o that system
>
> This is a hosted service, so I do not have access to this - though I believe
> this is a ZFS fs.
> Here's more info about the product: http://help.ovh.co.uk/Nas
>
>
>>
>> You may also be asked to upgrade to 9.1-ST
> Eugene Grosbein
>
While not the same you can always do this
mdconfig -a -t vnode -f yourfreebsd-version.iso
mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /cdrom
Then use pax, cpio , cp, rsync etc to copy the data off the image .
Also if memory serves me right libarchive may be able
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Mark Saad wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2013, at 7:00 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Release ISO images located at
>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/
>> were generated with mkisofs u
FUSE is pretty bad outside of FreeBSD 10 where it's rewritten and part of
the kernel. If your environment would be OK with making the leap to
FreeBSD 10 I'd recommend it.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:51:18 -0500, Torfinn Ingolfsen
wrote:
Ate there any bugreports or known problems?
Kernel panics. Lots of them. :)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubs
, the machine has been stable for all this time. However, one thing
> to note from a couple of days ago:
>
This is probably unrelated? As an aside, it'd be nice if mfi(4) dumped
info about the dcmd/io cmd at least once if it times out. At the moment,
it only does that if MFI_DEBUG is e
Is this your bug?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171121
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:49:21 -0500, Hiroki Sato wrote:
So, my questions are:
1. What do you think about current granularity of the relnotes items?
Too detailed, good, or too rough? Currently, judgment of what is
included or not is based on user-visible, new functionality, or
perfo
; Ben
>
> __
Two points. I like the details of the release notes . More detail here is
always welcomed. As a professional FreeBSD SA it helps to have detailed notes.
Second, goes to item 3 noted above: a summary of pr' filed on the previous
release and thei
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:11:43 -0500, Rainer Duffner
wrote:
Hi,
I use ftp-proxy, together with the patch that starts multiple instances:
I recommend avoiding ftp-proxy and setting up static rules that you know
will work. On our systems in pure-ftpd.conf we set
PassivePortRange
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:14:08 -0500, emmanuel cozic
wrote:
Hi
What is the login end the password for live cd FreeBSD 9.1, please ?
There is no password. You should be able to use user "root" with a blank
password.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.or
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Dave Hayes wrote:
> Greetings all. I'm on FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r251391M. I'm noticing two of my
> SATA disks are at half speed. Is this normal or is there some configuration
> I'm forgetting?
In my experience it's fairly common to have a mix of 6Gb/s and 3Gb/s po
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 04:18:37 -0500, Chris H wrote:
How do I best sort this all out. I _really_ miss the perl_after_upgrade
script, that
used to accompany this process.
I've had zero problems with upgrades to Perl, etc after I stopped
compiling my packages in the host OS and started buildi
Is there a reason you're avoiding poudriere/pkg ? It's simple to setup and
extremely reliable. Your headaches go away because all of your package
upgrades get built in a jail and you don't have a half-broken system while
waiting for portmaster to run.
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm
wrote:
Will that patch make it into 9.2? If I am not mistaken, that patch isn't
in stable yet.
I would also like to see this patch hit 9.x sooner than later. It's so
painful when someone forgets to fix the alias numbering on servers with
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, at 14:09, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> Ok, thanks. But shouldn't the documentation be changed
> to reflect that?
>
Whoa, I need to test this now, as we are used to being able to turn this
on/off by editing /etc/pam.d/system and sshd
___
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, at 14:19, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
>
> More than that. In my opinion it should be updated by replacing nss_ldap
> and pam_ldap with nss-pam-ldapd which splits the job of both into a
> shared daemon talking to the LDAP server and small stubs linked into the
> NSS / PAM using proces
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013, at 14:51, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be easier just to edit /etc/nsswitch.conf
> anyway?
>
Yes, but bad things happen if you're upgrading a server and there are
library changes but you've left it in the pam.d/* files. I guess I
wasn't very specific.
_
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 6:12, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
>
> What is the current, non deprecated way, to configure IP addresses in
> rc.conf? Let's say for a dual stack, multi IP box I need to set:
>
> 10.0.0.66/28 and 10.0.0.67-78 as aliases and
> fdda:5cc1:23:4::1/48 and fdda:5cc1:23:4::2-f as al
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013, at 7:21, Łukasz Wąsikowski wrote:
>
> I'm using ipv4_addrs_em0 now (and ipv6_addrs_em0 with Kimmo Paasiala's
> patch), but Hiroki Sato wrote:
>
> hr># IPv4 address range spec. Now deprecated.
> hr>ipv4_addr_em0="10.2.1.1-10"
>
> So I'm a little confused now :)
As
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:19:31 -0500, Kevin Oberman
<[1]rkober...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It didn't. 10.2.1.1-10 syntax did.
I'm not totally clear on this yet -- the entire concept of being able
to do *ranges* is deprecated? Or is it deprecated because it's missing
the CIDR?
Thanks
References
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, at 6:09, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does this work on stable/9 or only on current ? If not, are there
> any plans to MFC ? I ask because I don't see the
> ifconfig_IF_aliases syntax in /etc/defaults/rc.conf on a newly
> built stable/9 box.
>
It's there in /e
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013, at 4:36, Hiroki Sato wrote:
>
> The recommended way is ifconfig_IF_aliasN or ifconfig_IF_aliases.
> ipv4_addr_IF will not be removed in the near future, but please use
> ifconfig_IF_alias{N,es} for newly-configured systems. Backward
> compatibility for not breaking the e
Thanks for that info, Hiroki. I'm running CURRENT on my main server and
do see this now. Could you also make a note to add it to
/etc/default/rc.conf as well?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
ust move to a newer version
of FreeBSD, but I'm willing to backport changes if anyone can point me
to something that might help.
Thanks,
-Mark
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stab
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:18:52PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:07:55PM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm trying to investigate and solve some postgres latency spikes that
> > I'm seeing as a result of some
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 04:15:35PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 3:18:52 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:07:55PM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > > During such an fsync, DTrace shows me that syncer sleeps of 50-200ms are
>
ncer itself,
i.e as a pair.
To be honest, it's simpler to just install a pfsense installation for the whole
package though.
- Mark
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
People don't seem upset about not having a webserver, IMAP/POP daemon,
or LDAP server in base, so I don't understand what the big deal is about
removing BIND. If the concern is over the rare case when you absolutely
need a DNS recursor and there are none you can reach I suppose we should
just impor
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, at 7:45, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>
> There are plenty of situations in which a remote recursive resolver is
> untrustworthy. (Some would say any situation.) It doesn't have to be
> BIND, but people do legitimately want the normal DNS diagnostic
> utilities, which sadly have
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, at 7:47, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
> We could in theory remove the BIND's authoritative name server
> executable... if that is attracting the SAs.
>
It's the same executable, that's the problem :-)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, at 8:44, Ronald Klop wrote:
>
> Interesting. What are your statistics of 'most' based on?
>
Yes, this shouldn't be left to conjecture. A large community poll should
be the first step IMHO.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing li
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, at 8:32, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> This is very much an situation like replacing gcc with clang/llvm.
> However, in the case of BIND we have no licensing problems, stability
> problems, performance problems etc --- just concerns that BIND generates
> many SAs -- which m
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, at 8:42, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>
> and every contrib part which is removed, detracts from this.
>
And every contrib part that is added to base is another piece of
software that rots for the life of a major release and ends up getting
replaced by frustrated endusers with
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, at 9:10, Ronald Klop wrote:
>
> DragonflyBSD also removed BIND from base some time ago.
> http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2010/05/06/5853.html
>
I was not aware of this; that's worth referencing. I'm not sure where
NetBSD stands but a quick search implies that they st
is actually very small.
Yes, this was a internal self consistancy check failing.
We are human and despite code reviews, unit and system tests, static
analysis checkers etc. some errors do make it through.
Mark
> > Daniel
> > ___
> >
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, at 6:15, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
> On 31.07.13 09:38, Shane Ambler wrote:
> >
> > For something that needs to be constantly updated in between system
> > updates then ports is the place to install it from.
>
> You don't have to update BIND constantly, especially if you are n
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013, at 7:37, Erwin Lansing wrote:
>
> 3rd party, and especially those that are still being distributed as
> experimental, will not be part of the base BIND code. It will only
> contain a direct import from the vendor sources.
>
I agree, experimental patches have no place in ba
I can't comment on the perl changes directly, but I can assure you that
if you use port-mgmt/pkg (pkgng) and build your ports into packages via
ports-mgmt/poudriere you will have zero upgrade problems -- a simple
"pkg upgrade" will handle the scenario properly. I really haven't tried
following UPD
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013, at 11:07, Chris H wrote:
> While that all sounds "dreamy". I don't think setting something
> like that up on a *half* up(graded|dated) server, should even be
> considered. Much less even possible. :(
>
Oh, it's more than possible.
1) Install poudriere, minimal configuration
on this issue ? Has anyone tested it or see it happen on
the release candidate ?
---
Mark saad | mark.s...@longcount.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 4:35, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> I tried to revert mentioned patch, i.e. applied this
>
> --- sendmail/conf.c.orig2013-08-08 12:28:40.0 +0400
> +++ sendmail/conf.c 2013-08-08 12:31:17.0 +0400
> @@ -4294,12 +4294,7 @@
> #else /* (SOLARIS > 1 &&
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:53, George Kontostanos wrote:
>
> Anybody?
>
Can you provide your jail configuration? I think 9.2 introduces the new
/etc/jail.conf functionality and perhaps it somehow it broke the way you
were doing it previously? If so, the old method is supposed to be work
as well...
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013, at 6:59, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
>
> I'm just guessing, but I doubt a jail would be able to create new ZFS
> filesystems outside its own structure, if at all able. A jail would
> however be allowed to (un)mount already existing filesystems within
> its own structure, i.e. Po
I've also toyed with dirhash on a few servers and received favorable
results. I've no idea where the defaults currently come from, but I'm
guessing probably around 1999 ;-)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi
ailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Mark saad | mark.s...@longcount.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Kirk
Will this be merged into 9.2-RC? Before the Release ?
---
Mark saad | mark.s...@longcount.org
On Aug 31, 2013, at 1:38 PM, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> Author: mckusick
> Date: Sat Aug 31 17:38:49 2013
> New Revision: 255104
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/255
Hello,
Jewbilation is one of the fastest growing directories and marketplaces
for party planning, weddings, and more targeting the Jewish community,
and includes a growing directory of everything from helping to find
vendors for parties/events/entertainment to gifts for holidays and other
eve
Rick
Would this affect 9.2-RCn ?
---
Mark saad | mark.s...@longcount.org
On Sep 11, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Lars Eggert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm seeing extremely high CPU usage withssh-st the new nfsd:
>>
>> PID USERNAME PRI NICE
che issues I had haven't reappeared either.
>
> I need to bang on it some more, but for now it seems great.
>
> Lars
has this issue been brought to re@ for inclusion in 9.2 ?
---
Mark saad | mark.s...@longcount.org
___
freebsd-stabl
en queue overflow: 193 already in queue awaiting acceptance
Use "netstat -nAa" to match the reported pcb (protocol control
block) to the IP address and port. Then use that to work out which
daemon is not keeping up.
Mark
> Thanks!
> _
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 10:00, Chris H wrote:
> Greetings,
> I was performing a ports search, and noticed that all the links
> providing more information about each port goes to the FreeBSD
> 404 page. For example, autotrace-0.31.1_23;
> The link to it is:
> http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuil
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013, at 19:51, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> Hi,
> It seems that the ZFS messages no longer match entries in devd.conf, eg..
> notify 10 {
> match "system" "ZFS";
> match "type""vdev";
> action "logger -p kern.err 'ZFS: vdev failure, zpool=$p
bble up and be treated as ERESTART,
resulting in a loop.
This can be confirmed with something like
dtrace -n 'syscall:::entry /pid == $target/{@[probefunc] = count();} tick-3s
{exit(0);}' -p
If the output consists solely of __sysctl, this bug is likely the
culprit.
-Mark
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 02:05:32PM +1000, Nick Frampton wrote:
> On 12/03/15 00:38, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> It sounds like this issue might be the one fixed in r272566: if the
> >>> > >KERN_PROC_ALL sysctl is read with an insufficiently large buffer, an
> >>> > >sbuf error return value could bubb
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Nick Frampton wrote:
> On 12/03/15 00:38, John Baldwin wrote:
It sounds like this issue might be the one fixed in r272566: if the
> >KERN_PROC_ALL sysctl is read with an insufficiently large buffer, an
> >sbuf error return value could bubble up
u're seeing.
> This is releng9 from today after a fresh buildworld/kernel
I'm not quite sure what you mean by releng9. Is it 9.0? 9.3? Does your
kernel configuration file contain "options KDTRACE_HOOKS"?
Thanks,
-Mark
___
freebsd-s
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015, at 05:43, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 01:31:14PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> > Hi there colleagues,
> >
> > I have stable/10 on a rather big machine (2*8*2 e5 Xeon, 64G RAM, SAS+SSD
> > ZFS
> > raid10+ZIL+L2ARC) acting as a PostgreSQL server.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015, at 09:10, Daniel Genis wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> we're currently running 10.1-RELEASE, but are encountering the l2arc
> memory leak which got resolved in 10.1-STABLE r274172, maybe we need
> r275609 also (as discussed here:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:34:17AM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote:
> Of course, with no network connection, it's not a very useful machine,
There are PCI slots on mine :-)
ok, joking aside, this is indeed not useful. But it's useful to note
that a couple of months ago, I was running my v245 hard, and it
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015, at 07:57, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
> Xin, Ian:
> Confirmed MFC of ntp 4.2.8p3 and related kernel fix.
> Thanks for your work!
>
> re@:
> Thanks for approving MFC at this timing, before creating releng/10.2.
>
> John:
> Congraturations! We have latest stable version of ntp w
ll now I want to make it work. :)
Any ideas here ?
mark saad | nones...@longcount.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
s!
> -NGie
NGie
I'll try the queues option but; why was does that kill my ehci hub ? Note
ehci0: mem 0xdd923000-0xdd9233ff irq 16
at device 26.0 on pci0
panic: Couldn't find an APIC vector for IRQ 16
--
mark saad | nones...@longcount.org
__
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:19:20AM +0200, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
> Why is zfs on i386 so hard?
zfs is a resource hog. i386 is not able to handle the demand as well
as amd64.
I have never, ever, heard of anyone who has a deep understanding of
zfs on FreeBSD recommend anything other than amd64.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:43:43AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM.
The only correct answer to "how much RAM do you need to run ZFS" is
"always more" AFAICT.
mcl
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.or
records from the
DNS reply (like the ADDITIONAL SECTION).
Mark
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
records from the
DNS reply (like the ADDITIONAL SECTION).
Mark
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ihood that xterm will block on exit.
Currently I have to reboot the machine periodicly once I have
accumulated
enough zombies to be annoying. Its not really a long term solution
though.
There is no need to reboot, just kill -9 the hanging xterm processes
and the init w
le, for needing console access after a power failure
> reboot. What am I unaware of?
>
My favorite example is when an NFS issue delays boot indefinitely and
you can't even SSH in to whack it with a hammer.
--
Mark Felder
ports-secteam member
f...@freebsd.org
_
end up
crashing on loading a vboxdrv kernel module during startup.
Mark
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence
> of a comma
If we are now going to evaluate all proposed changes to FreeBSD on the
same rigid principles as the US legal system, I'm done.
mcl
> > Good to see that there are pkg builds for powerpc64 these
> > days: FreeBSD:12:powerpc64 and FreeBSD:11:powerpc64 are
> > listed in the Tier-2 support package sets list as well.
uh ... those were probably the last ones I did. AFAIK no package
building has been done at isc for years.
mcl
___
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 04:39:41PM +, Mark Linimon wrote:
> uh ... those were probably the last ones I did.
never mind, this is a new machine under test.
I missed seeing the listing even when I looked at pkg.FreeBSD.org ...
earlier today.
Same, FreeBSD update doesn't seem to be working:
$ sudo freebsd-update upgrade -r 12.0-BETA2
Mark
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 13:24, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 07:59:32AM +0000, Mark Dixon wrote:
> > Same, FreeBSD update doesn't seem to be working:
> >
> > $ sudo freebsd-update upgrade -r 12.0-BETA2
>
> IIRC freebsd-update only works for RCs, not
ked for years, but recent
changes to the uefi loader caused it to start caring about this and break
into the loader instead of booting. The line I had to add was:
search --fs-uuid --set=root
The only way I could find out how to fix this was via the -current list
archives (and t
301 - 400 of 1357 matches
Mail list logo
