hipset
that are not being given to the guest, b) there is no real gain with this
hardware doing this,
you can get performance using the normal virtual device connection.
Bottom line, its possible this could be made to work, but I've not done it,
and its not
something I'm able to support.
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer <
h.schmalzba...@omnilan.de> wrote:
> schrieb Jack Vogel am 07.09.2012 18:53 (localtime):
> > OH, now things are clearer, this is a client part, and it is supported
> > by the em driver,
> > I don't know why l
gt; ifconfig_lagg0_alias0="inet 192..."
> >>
> >> I've had problems in the past with cloned interfaces not working right
> >> if you do everything in one ifconfig line. Never spent much time
> >> debugging it, though, as the split
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash
> wrote:
> >> Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x.
> >>
> >>
broken design??
There is nothing you can do about this because the issue is in the host,
not the guest,
well getting the host code fixed is the solution :)
Hope this helps,
Jack
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 11:49:45AM +0200, Harald Schmalzba
Something in your environment, have lots of users with this driver in very
demanding
environments and I have not been seeing reports of this sort.
Jack
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> I've got an Intel server motherboard with 4x igb (and 1x em) on i
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> To Jack Vogel's comment, this problem only seems to occur on systems
> that are exceedingly lightly loaded (in this case, not yet in
> production and I'm the only one using it).
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at
Try putting the driver from 9.1 back onto 8.3 and see if you still
see a problem. That will indicate if its in the driver or the stack/OS.
If you have any question about doing this send me email.
Is NFS using UDP or TCP?
Regards,
Jack
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote
Hi,
In this mailinglist I'm reading a lot about problems (re)compiling the system.
At this moment I'm running:
"FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE (ORAC) #0 r244047: Sun Dec 9 15:33:19 CET 2012"
without problems.
Is it save to recompile the system with all patches
link:
http://communities.intel.com/community/wired/blog/2013/02/07/intel-82574l-gigabit-ethernet-controller-statement
Any questions or concerns may be sent to me.
Cheers,
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
roblem at
times with those that is corrected in recent shared code, this is why you
should try the
latest code.
Cheers,
Jack
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:00 AM, dennis berger wrote:
> Hi list,
> since we activated 10gbe on ixgbe cards + jumbo frames(9k) on 9.0 and now
> on 9.1 we recog
r you will be ready to send the whole chain to the stack.
Its good that you are using ONEBUF since packet split has hardware issues
on 82599.
Are you developing a new driver, or simply having issues using mine?
Regards,
Jack
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Kaushal Bhandankar wrote:
> In 82
ixgb is the old PCI-X based adapter, ixgbe is for all pci express hardware.
The latter is almost certainly what you want :)
Jack
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> hi,
> I have a hard time figuring this out, the kernel says:
> ...
> ix0: port
> 0x
I will look into this.
Jack
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> Hello Jack, list,
>
> I've been dealing with a nagging problem for a day now and decided to ask a
> quick question here.
>
> Basically I am building a brand new FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE ro
will check it out and have my validation
engineer do some tests and
we'll get to the bottom of this.
Jack
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> Thanks for the patch Oleg.
> I'll give it a try but I would also like to hear back from Jack.
>
> Oleg,
Thanks for the investigation, I guess what I'm wondering the most right now
is if the patch from
Oleg is a good change in general, so any others that can test and give me
results would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Jack
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> Hi Jack,
&g
sysctl dev.ix.0 etc...
Jack
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am trying to tweak some of the sysctl tunables for the ix (ixgbe) driver
> in FreeBSD 9.2 since I am experiencing less than ideal performance and it
> seems like I
Make sure you are in slots with enough lanes/bandwidth, the driver should
complain when loaded
if you aren't though. Make sure you aren't getting interrupts throttled,
and that you have sufficient
mbuf resources so you aren't waiting on those, that can make a BIG
difference.
Jack
Set the storm threshold to 0, that way you disable the check and don't have
to wonder
if its a problem :)
Given everything you've told me I'd suspect the switch... easy enough to
test, remove it
from the equation, run two systems back-to-back and see how that effects
the numbers.
Have you tried it on HEAD, and have you tried it on the same system with
some
recent flavor of Linux?
Jack
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Paul Mather <
freebsd-li...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Alban Hertroys wrote:
>
> > On 3 August 2015 at
Should give someone a clue, something in the usb code that 10.2 didn't get
perhaps...
Thanks,
Jack
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Paul Mather <
freebsd-li...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Paul Mather
> wrote:
>
> > On Aug 3, 2015, at 1
You missed the all-important details: OS version, driver version.
And another question I can think of, do these interfaces watchdog if they
are not configured with lagg?
Cheers,
Jack
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Frank de Bot (lists)
wrote:
> On a server I have 2 interfaces configured
Yes, I upgraded 2 systems and both experience the same behavior
Dell R610 and Dell 7010 here. Afraid to upgrade any others
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 8:25 PM Terry Kennedy wrote:
>
> I have a system I updated from r352025 (which worked fine) to r352200.
> Any attempt to boot r352200 results in th
I bought a new a PC and now eager waiting for the new release to arrive!!!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I have a version of code ready to MFC, the big difference with CURRENT
is that TSO is #ifdef'd off until Andre is able to get that back.
I wanted a chance for any concerns to be aired before I did it, issues
that anyone has had with the driver in CURRENT?
Regards,
On 6/6/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a version of code ready to MFC, the big difference with CURRENT
is that TSO is #ifdef'd off until Andre is able to get that back.
I wanted a chance for any concerns to be aired before I did it, issues
that anyone has had with th
that if getting it into 7.0 would be
desireable.
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
on?
What you will be able to do shortly is download the new driver from
Intel, version 6.6.6 (LOL, really :), it has the nice feature of being
compilable for either 7 or 6. I just don't think its hit the website
quite yet, any day now. I have been real busy, but I will begin
the work to do an MFC
On 9/20/07, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > > Failing that.. Any idea how hard it would be to add the ID for this
> > > controller to the driver in 6.2? (ie does it need magic not present
> > >
On 9/23/07, Daniel O'Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Then on the side menu pick network connectivity, then server adapter,
> > and select an adapter, it shouldnt matter which. Once at that page
> > there is a pulldown
locks that are already in my Oplin driver (ixgbe)
but this will take a bit longer.
This driver has the support for TSO in it but its not on
by default, as soon as Andre is able to get that MFC'd
it can be enabled via a compile option.
Jack
___
free
On 10/8/07, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:28 PM 10/5/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
> >I am preparing to update the em driver to the equivalent of my
> >6.6.6 driver. Just doing some last minute sanity checking, I
> >hope to the checkin before end of day.
&g
On 10/8/07, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:36 PM 10/8/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> >So the missed packets are only showing up on em2?
> Hi,
>
> Yes, but thats where all the packets come in.
>
> >Uh, and that is a management-capable 8
On 10/8/07, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:36 PM 10/8/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> >Search thru the archives of this mailing list, look for 82573. There is
> >a DOS patcher that I have sent out a couple times. Its harmless to
> >run it, if the adapter
On 10/9/07, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:37 AM 10/9/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > > Thanks,
> > > I did find this reference
> > > http://www.higherorder.com.au/2007/6/25/intel_82573_patch
> > >
> > > Is there a way fro
he question: what is
the numeric way of designating RELEASE vs STABLE??
I could also just do this as EM_MSI_SUPPORT and then define
that in the Makefiles, but this seemed like the simplest way.
If someone can tell me how to do it I will check that change in
tod
On 10/11/07, David Yeske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/11/07, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have had a couple questions about using the driver that I just put
> > into STABLE on 6.2 RELEASE.
> >
> > Right now it won't compile, this i
email.
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
o do with MSI/X.
This is pretty odd, I've never run into anything like it so far. Anyone else
with ideas or suggestions?
Regards,
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
el em driver, and build the other and use that
with the 10/1 kernel.
Let me know what you'd prefer.
Jack
On 10/12/07, Alson van der Meulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-13 01:30]:
> > Hmmm, so am I correct in understanding t
OK, I will look into this as soon as I can.
Jack
On 10/19/07, Philip Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 20/10/2007, at 1:06 AM, Goran Lowkrantz wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > After the update of em to 6.6.6 last, I experience watchdog timeouts
> > on a s
e problems started for em users when the driver was updated
> from 6.2.9 to 6.6.6.
When I have an easy-to-repro problem I can generally fix it in short
order. The problem is this is not something that I've repro'd. I am
aware of the reports, and I'm always interested in helpful d
big jumbo
driver with all in there, or one that will only work with a subset
of adapters. This one would probably be the most work, because
its a new approach.
Cheers,
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
On 10/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:45:17 -0700,
> Jack Vogel wrote:
> >
> > I have an important decision to make and I thought rather than just make
> > it and spring it on you I'd present the issues and see wh
n 7.0.
Right now my suspicion is that the FAST irq handling is
again causing a problem. I am experimenting with variations
to the code today to be sure whats going on, and hopefully
fixing it.
Cheers,
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
Any ideas??
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
r end users.
Yes, this is a good point, and when I'm done I will make sure that
only the appropriate ID's will work on a particular driver so this
kind of thing does not happen.
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
importantly, I have personally not seen this problem on 7, but
I could set up #ifdef's in that driver to be the same way.
What does everyone think?
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stab
STABLE, October Snapshot, is related to it.
Regards,
Jack
On 10/31/07, Vladimir Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Long wrote:
> > Jack Vogel wrote:
> >> I have found that the FAST interrupt handling is implicated
> >> in the watchdog resets that
I should also note that this only applies to PCI-E NICs, 82571 and later.
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
loader.conf to enable msi on boot.
I am going to add a display that will tell you when an adapter uses MSI or MSI/X
next time I check in code.
Not only does this solve my watchdog problems, I also find on the UDP_STREAM
test of netperf that I get better performance when using MSI.
Let me know how it w
what you
find.
I hope to get this all resolved and into the tree for 6.3.
Jack
if_em.h
Description: Binary data
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &q
Eh, what I see is if_em.h and if_em.c, does the version
that came thru not have both??
Jack
On 11/1/07, Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You just replace the two files in your STABLE tree. Its big
> > enough that this seemed easier than a patch.
>
> Did you m
Although I see it at least one person claims the message
came thru with only the header file, so I am going
to send if_em.c thru again.
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To
It seems that some mailer is stripping source attachments,
so I'm sending this in an archive.
NOTE: the attachment is a bz2, rename to extract it.
Jack
test-em
Description: Binary data
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
So at this point I'm unclear, with my reposting of if_em.c last
night has everyone seen both parts or do I have to try something
else?
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stab
7;
> > > device = '82540EP Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Mobile)'
> >
> > I just cvsup'ed to the new em 6.7.2 version without FAST interrupt and
> > lags in sound and USB mouse has gone. Thank you.
>
> However, if I define EM_FAST_IRQ, then lag
using STABLE.
Cheers,
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Is there a list somewhere of what are considered 'components' that
> could be enabled or disabled??
Opps, NM, was being lazy, after looking for 2 mins I found it :)
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
On Nov 8, 2007 7:29 AM, Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> > And, is the ACPI subsystem likely to be the source of the problem?
>
> I've had several systems in which I've needed to disable the ACPI
On Nov 15, 2007 7:17 AM, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 13 October 2007 11:59:40 am Alson van der Meulen wrote:
> > * Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-13 05:19]:
> > > A suggestion, take the relevant files from my em driver and put
> &
happen?
Cheers,
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
vmstat -i
Disconnect the cable from it when you boot, also pciconf -l
to see what type adapter it is.
This is storming before you assign it an address?
On Nov 15, 2007 11:18 AM, Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, freebsd-stable.
>
> Upgrading my netwrok from 100Mbit to 1Gbit.
>
On Nov 15, 2007 11:52 AM, Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Jack.
> You wrote 15 ?? 2007 ?., 22:46:59:
>
> (after loading drivers for my X100P Zaptel voice card, but it doesn't
> change anything).
>
> > vmstat -i
> interrupt
On Nov 15, 2007 12:45 PM, Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Jack.
> You wrote 15 ?? 2007 ?., 23:03:46:
>
>
> > sysctl hw.intr_storm_threshold
>If I set this onw to 1, em0 generate 1001-1002 irq per second
> (accroding to vmstat
On Nov 15, 2007 12:54 PM, Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, Jack.
> You wrote 15 ?? 2007 ?., 23:52:36:
>
> > Have you tried this NIC on anything previously, an older release?
> No... And I don't have spare computer for such test :(
OK, then we
On Nov 15, 2007 1:11 PM, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 12:54 PM, Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello, Jack.
> > You wrote 15 ?? 2007 ?., 23:52:36:
> >
> > > Have you tried this NIC on anything previously, an
t.inet.tcp.tso=0 OR (strange thing)
> delete ipfw divert rule
>
> If necessary I will collect and send more info.
TSO is silly at 100Mb, turn it off :)
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Nov 30, 2007 1:03 AM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jack Vogel wrote:
> > On Nov 29, 2007 11:21 PM, Vitezslav Novy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> my configuration is
> >>
> >> kernel GENERIC
inute. (Just after
> it starts the second CPU).
Did you happen to check if during that time the floppy disk is being accessed?
If it is just reconfig the kernel with that device out and the hang
won't happen.
That is the only hang that I'
ot a verbose one can be
> uploaded if needed.
>
> The only changes to the BIOS were to run AHCI instead of emulation for all
> the SATA drives.
>
> Thank you,
> Jonathan Stewart
the dmesg is unhelpful, is this a new adapter? please show me a pciconf -l
Happy Holidays,
Ja
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ken,
After CVSuping newvers.sh still tells me I am using the prerelease
Jack
- - Original Message -
From: "Ken Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "freebsd-stable"
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 8:18 PM
Subject: Fre
rrata notes and roll new ISOs for 6.4.
About FreeBSD 6.4. If you consider to make new 6.4 iso's, perhaps it would
be better to think about an 6.5 release
Jack Raats
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
ew
documentation parts.
Indeed, that's a lot of work for an errata patch.
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Greg,
I have another report of this problem, and I have a patch for you to try
out, will
be sending it out a bit later today.
Jack
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 5:50 AM, Greg Byshenk wrote:
> I have one machine that is seeing watchdog timeouts on em0, running
> 7-STABLE
> amd64 as of 2
Better yet, just let them autoneg and you won't have these problems :)
Jack
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Never only set one end manually, always set both the machine and the
> switch.
>
> Regards
> Steve
>
> - Original Messag
.
I hope this helps resolve any of these issues customers are still seeing.
Cheers everyone,
Jack Vogel
Intel Lan Access Division
free...@intel.com
ESB2_problems.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
check.
Jack
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:39 AM, David Peall wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a new box here a Intel DP45GS and a Quad core Intel with 4GB ram
> that I would like to install FreeBSD on.
> I've tried booting with 7.0, 7.1, 7.2 and 8-BETA2 amd64 and all get stuck
> on:
>
> >
> > Do you have the latest BIOS installed?
> >
> > When you say it's stuck does pressing scrolllock and paging back work?
>
> No stuck dead no scroll lock, no num lock and no caps lock. Also can't
> ctrl+alt+del have to hold power
.
What about system tuning?
Some ideas, let me know how it goes.
Jack
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Rudy wrote:
> Rudy wrote:
>
>> Rudy wrote:
>>
>>> I am having watchdog timeout issues
>>>
>>
> Oh, here is some more info from 'pciconf -lcv&
If you are not then go into the BIOS and disable that stuff.
Have you run netstat or some other resource monitor to see if you run out of
anything that might coincide with the watchdogs...
Jack
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Rudy (bulk) wrote:
>
> I have a quad card in a PCIe 8x port,
Watchdog resets the adapter. Messing with these values is of dubious value
anyway.
Jack
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Rudy wrote:
>
> I noticed something interesting.
>
> I set the rc_int_delay to 0:
> sysctl dev.em.5.rx_int_delay=0
>
> Chcking via sysctl d
most always means something in your environment, a cron job run
amok, a piece of hardware that resets, I dunno, but the last thing I would
suspect given this description is the driver.
You need a good sysadmin for this debugging I would venture, not a driver
developer.
Jack
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at
ues in the future.
Jack
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Daniel Bond wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> I'll comment your mail inline:
>
>
> On Oct 5, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> This posting just muddies the issue, first you talk about having a problem
>> that
omewhat dissatisfied with the watchdog design and
think
its kinda flawed, I could try and make you an experimental with debug and
some
changes that you can try if you'd like.
Jack
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Rudy wrote:
> Finally, while doing some comparisons, I realized that the mothe
If you look at the ftp.freebsd.org than you can see that the 10.3-RELEASE
can be downloaded.
The strange thing is that there is no announcement yet.
Also the newvers.sh still has PRERELEASE in stead of STABLE.
Can anyone explain why this hasn¹t happened yet???
Thanks!
Jack
Op 01-04-16 00
Adding FreeBSD stable to see if they can provide some insight on this since
it affects everything from 11 and beyond
>
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Bertram Scharpf > wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 25. Nov 2016, 20:06:55 -0800, Jack L. wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016
ined reference to
`__sys_fdatasync'
c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
*** [clang-tblgen.full] Error code 1
Systeem: FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE At revision 310725.
Can anyone give me a clue?
Thanks
Jack
___
> On 28 Dec 2016, at 23:47, Jack Raats wrote:
>>
>> At this moment Iâll get the following error while compiling buildworld
>>
>>
>>
>> --- clang-tblgen.full ---
>>
>> c++ -O2 -pipe -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/lib/clang/libllvm
>> -I/
Problem SOLVED. I copied libpthread.a from a jail on that server to the right
directory and could compile the source.
It seemed that the library was somehow damaged.
Grtz.,
Jack
Op 29-12-16 16:06 heeft Dimitry Andric geschreven:
On 28 Dec 2016, at 23:47, Jack Raats wrote:
>
&
I have a few still sitting in a corner with FreeBSD 7 or 8 on them. Someday i
might put them back on with FreeBSD but not anytime soon
Sent from far away...
> On Mar 25, 2017, at 11:02 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone [still] use Opteron 6100-series / "Magny-Cours" processors with
>
I went from 9 to 11 without issue with the make work/kernel method and
rebuilt all the ports.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
> Zoran Kolic wrote on 2017/06/20 17:12:
>>>
>>> Generally (and previously) the advice is to go via the next major version
>>>
I use crontab @daily (/sbin/gmirror status | grep -q COMPLETE) || mail
-s "gmirror failure" email addy
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Vincent Hoffman-Kazlauskas
wrote:
>
>
> On 08/05/2018 08:28, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> out of curiosity, does any kind of GMirror-failure notificatio
ithout ACPI is that IBM does not
have the legacy MP table stuff set up, they require the ACPI tables to do
MP (this is intentional not an oversight).
A useful exercise would be to do a pciconf when you are up and see what
pci devices are unknown.
Good
On 8/20/06, Nikolas Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/1/06, Jack Vogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I occasionally run into issues that newer PCI device IDs are
> not yet supported, these in particular are on a new box
> I am working on. Can someone see that these cha
s is great news, thanks. Our test group just ran into an odd problem
which I think is traced back to this, so being in 6.2 will be helpful :)
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubsc
s what. :)
You get to use the em driver, not the fxp.
The 6.1 RELEASE may not yet have support, but since they merged my
6.0.5 and 6.1.4 drivers with the STABLE tip of tree if you get that latest
driver it should work.
If not let me know,
Jack
Intel LAD
_
s point.
Try this: the default is only to have 256 descriptors, try going for the MAX
which is 4K.
Cheers,
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
CPU)
Is it possible that it happens since I upgraded the memory from 1GB to 2
GB?
watchdogs mean that the transmit ring is not being cleaned, so the
question is what is your machine doing at 100% cpu, if its that busy
the network watchdogs may just be a side effect and not the real
pro
be helpful to know if this is a driver problem or something
in the stack.
Cheers,
Jack
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
201 - 300 of 436 matches
Mail list logo
