Re: Firewall config non-intuitiveness

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Warner, if the proposed change were to be made, you could get the same : effect by doing, : : firewall_enable="YES" : firewall_script="/dev/null" : : Which I think more accurately describes the behavio

Re: Firewall config non-intuitiveness

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : If I enable the clutch in my car, my car moves (assuming it's in gear). : If I disable it, the power is no longer going to the drive wheels. That's not quite right, but it is a good analogy. If you disable yo

Re: Another Linksys WDT11 problem

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:52:06PM -0600, Eric Liedtke wrote: : > Ok, from my last mail I got the card working fine. So it was time to : > tranfer it to a 3rd machine, my home router, as it's final resting place

Re: RELENG_4_? Branch Terminology

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Christopher Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : 4.4-RELEASEp1 would be the 1st commit to RELENG_4_4 (aka the security : branch) after RELENG_4_4_0_RELEASE (4.4-RELEASE). "commit" here is subjective. Sometimes it can be multiple events that comprise

Re: speeding up usb

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : that usb umass hard drive is sloow. anything i can do? 200kB/s is the normal speed that you should expect on writes. There are faster CF cards available (usually listed as 4x or 8x on the box), but CF is sl

Re: PC-Card

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I just upgraded it to -STABLE and both problems have gone away. Cards work : fine both with ISA routing and PCI routing. Excellent, good work Warner! You are welcome. Hope that I don't break you again with 5.0.

Re: bizarre hanging at root mount

In message: <200203141601.LAA69821> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Hi Warner, I have an even stranger problem now. Lpd and syslogd : refuse to start from rc. I can start Lpd manually, but syslogd : won't. I wonder if this has anything to do with those kernel tuning : params. I went a

Re: pcmcia insert/remove/insert on boot?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tim Kellers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I see that same message on the Dell latitude I'm using --with both the Dell : TrueMobile and the Orinoco Wavelan cards (both gold and silver). Apparently : is cause no trouble (that I've seen). If it didn't

Re: make: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 08:28:08PM -0800, Peter Hessler wrote: : > I am trying to update my 4.5-stable system, and I keep getting the : > error "make: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected" : : The error text you'

Re: make: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected

In message: Peter Hessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : It looks like the make executable is bunk. I am using bsd make, not : gmake. Now I need to generate make w/o make. (yay!) Been there, done that, hated it. Your best bet is to grab o

Re: dell inspiron 8000 freebsd -stable

In message: <004901c1d53f$552ca650$1fa531d8@saturated> "paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: :DVD-ROM drive on inspiron 8000 doesn't work in freebsd -stable. I : searched the mailing lists and found a work around to do an : autoboot_delay="60" which after doing my dvdrom drive worked

Re: dump over SSH: please MFC

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Johann Frisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : 5 months ago, a change was made to "Allow users to specify a : command to use as remote command instead of using rcmd directly", : see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/net/rcmd.c : : The comm

Re: pccard working on smp in -stable?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : The desktop machine is SMP with an ISA pccard controller added. I've : looked into the archives and found a suggestion that pccard has not been : tested with SMP. Is this correct? What would be involved with g

Re: 3Com AirConnect Driver Merge

In message: <3CC2573A@caliber> Alex McHale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : 5.0-CURRENT recently had a merge from NetBSD in the wi driver, for support for : Symbol based cards (such as the 3Com AirConnect). I am curious if this merge : will ever happen in 4.5. If anyone can tell me YA

Re: NFS timing out over wi0 interface using UDP?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : If anyone knows of any reason why it may be failing, or wants any : debugging data, please let me know, otherwise I'll just file a PR. I've done some pretty heavy stuff over NFS over wi0 (including a buildworl

Re: "Unknown user: smmsp"

In message: Juha Saarinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: : : > I don't know if its fixed, but another problem is when you try to use : > mergemaster it used to fail because that user couldn't be found, most : > likely due to mtree, I

Re: ipl problem in wi_hostapp.c ?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Paul Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Mon, 20 May 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Paul Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : Just curious, what is then the r

Re: Netgear MA301 Wireless PCI woes

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Well, I found out what the problem is. The face plate is far enough away : from where it should be that the card wasn't physically plugged in. : Seems my kernel and the generic kernels both work... That would also cause

Re: wi0 and mtu setting

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I definetely agree and obviously since mikrotikos supports this then linux : should do since mikrotikos is built on linux. Why shouldnt FreeBSD support : setting mtu of wireless interfaces higher than 1500 Pat

Re: wi0 and mtu setting [bad idea]

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Yes, actually this is why I asked first about MTU settings in wi. I use : PPPoE and it has 8bytes overhead. It could be nice to set MTU to 1508 so : 1500 byte ethernet frames can be encapsualted in PPPoE withou

Re: wi0 and mtu setting [bad idea]

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I think something is called broken when it doesnt work as you expect it to : work or it doesnt comply with standards. : Also I think something is called an 'extra feature' if it is not in the : standard which d

Re: wi0 and mtu setting [bad idea]

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Evren Yurtesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Sorry about that but everybody seemed to disagree to having this option of : 1500+ MTU settings in wi driver. : : If you will support this, then its just fine for me. I dont complain! =) : Sorry! Well, this c

Re: changes in FreeBSD-STABLE src/sys/i386/i386/nexus.c 1.26.2.9

cTimeTag Unit 3 Channel 3:Got Tag 472221 84751:086171223:20002 Correlated Timescale In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Oliver Eikemeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : After rebuilding my kernel with FreeBSD-STABLE booting fails with: : : panic: still using grody create_intr interface :

Re: Kernel core dump in recent 4.8-STABLE

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : : > The only interesting commit I see in that range is Tor's process : > leader sharing work. Cc'ing him. : : That commit broke kernel modules depending on the layout of struct : proc. Since recompiling the kernel module is

sshd 'zombie' processes

each scp or ssh I do to a 4.8-stable machine I have gives me two 'zombie' processes: root 282 0.0 0.4 5236 2184 ?? I 7:41AM 0:00.05 sshd: imp [priv] (sshd) imp 284 0.0 0.4 5252 2260 ?? I 7:41AM 0:00.01 sshd: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (sshd) I had been running 4.8-RC when I

Stallion EC8/32-AT

Anybody successfully using the Stallion EC8/32-AT on -stable? I just tried using the one I got on ebay and found that it hands on port close and passes no characters at all. Do any of the stallion cards work? Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list h

Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dave Horsfall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Well, imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead... It appears that re changed the way they are tagging releases again. The last time we had 4.x-BETA was 4.2. A review of the cvs log for the n

Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable?

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Thursday 22 April 2004 16:16, Dave Horsfall wrote: : > On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Ceri Davies wrote: : > > > Are there any, umm, release notes for 4.10-BETA, so I can see what I'm : > > > in for? : > > : > > T

Re: NTPD and SecureLevel

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Magda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : On Jun 16, 2004, at 03:47, Pavel M. Rebrov wrote: : : > I've installed and configured ntpd daemon and was wondering if it : > going to work with SecureLevel higher than 1. SecureLevel 2 forbids : > changing

Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > I'm interested about directories that are changed by system/system : > programs - I belive most confusing is /var in theory there shouldn't : > be anything important there (well except logs), but I already noti

<    1   2   3   4   5   6