I have a machine where several of my installed applications are getting
way behind. It is not a mission critical server, but I need it to be
stable (I have all fairly old well supported hardware, nothing special).
Since updating and rebuilding all the ports is pretty much mandatory for
the up
I have seen messages like this on every FreeBSD machine that I have ever
built. Can anybody indicate to me what this means?
pid 60038 (conftest), uid 0: exited on signal 12 (core dumped)
This issue is ALWAYS with "conftest".
Tom Veldhouse
___
fre
Chuck Swiger wrote:
While building software which uses GNU autoconf, ./configure tries to
build and run a bunch of tiny test programs to see whether various
system calls are available and how they work, figure out sizes of
variable types, look for compilers for languages not being used by
your
available?
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 07C7 BF05 4176 F50B A083 4542 0118 1315 761F D300
Spammers please contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:29:08AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
I just read in the release notes that 5.3-RELEASE has the new ULE
scheduler available, but that 4BSD is the default scheduler. I thought
I read messages in freebsd-current indicating that the option to
Can this be true? Are they really looking to kill the FreeBSD demon?
This borders on sacrilege.
http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/09/1955251&from=rss
Tom Veldhouse
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
r/share/info/dir
===> include
creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh
touch: not found
*** Error code 127
Stop in /usr/src/include.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
ekg#
--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 08:09:43AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Right away ... first thing!
--
Installing everything
--
cd /usr/src
And then I suddenly see a new thread about FreeBSD 6.2 status appear ...
after I sent the email. Sorry for the noise.
I have been following the release candidates for some time. Suddenly,
progress seems to have halted, but checking this list from time to time
have revealed no discussion
I have been following the release candidates for some time. Suddenly,
progress seems to have halted, but checking this list from time to time
have revealed no discussion that I have noticed.
According to this site, it was expected more than one month ago?
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.2R
What is the best approach to keep dhclient from overwriting
/etc/resolv.conf every time it gets a new lease on an IP address? This
has been a frustrating search as Google has turned up next to nothing on
the issue other than a hack into a script file which should be
overwritten when world is r
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
On 05/06/2006 14:24, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
What is the best approach to keep dhclient from overwriting
/etc/resolv.conf every time it gets a new lease on an IP address? This
has been a frustrating search as Google has turned up next to nothing on
the issue
Can anybody indicate to me what is causing the attached email and how to
fix it? I upgraded to the 5.4-STABLE as of yesterday and I am now
getting the attached email several time a day. Is this simply a script
error?
Thanks,
Tom Veldhouse
--- Begin Message ---
X: not found
--- End Message ---
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
I'm not using 5.4 but I would look in the save-entropy script for a
line that starts with 'X '. Also, looking at the source, have a look
at /etc/rc.conf and/or /etc/defaults/rc.conf as they are read at the
beginning of that script.
Actually, I can reproduce such message by
I run a very small home office network and domain off of my DSL.
Currently, I have a FreeBSD 5.4p8 firewall (pf) running. I am really
not having any issues, but sometimes the machines gets a bit stodgy for
no solid reason [load shouldn't be that high]. I have considered the
jump to 6.0, but
Chris wrote:
Ok thanks I already use it for ports, but just plain -O2 -pipe for the
world and kernel.
Hmm ... I find this thread surprising, as this is the first I have heard
of FreeBSD working correctly with -O2. So, is this the options
suggested for make.conf on x86?
CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe
I am also seeing BTX failures, but only from manual commands. The lsdev
command will cause BTX to fail (and halt) when it scans my CDROM/DVD. I am
using 4.1.1-RELEASE. I have a ABIT KA7-100 board (which uses the VIA686A
chipset for IDE access).
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Me
I just upgraded via sources from a 4.2-BETA to todays 4.2-STABLE. Now I
can not get port forwarding to work through my SSH clients anymore. I can
not find an option in /etc/ssh/sshd_config that turns this option on or
off. What am I missing? Why has this option so quietly changed?
Tom Veldhou
I generally don't compile the kernel with any optimizations except
"-O -pipe". I never have a problem - and I don't have any performance
differences that have been noticable.
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Powell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECT
I hate that when that happens. It has happened with a lot of ports lately
(i.e. unixODBC). I usually figure the port was upgraded but the patches
weren't removed - so I remove them. It usually works :(
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Nader Turki" <[EMAIL PR
Curiosity is one answer. Another allows somebody to offer multiple
solutions to a problem - each with their own benefits (presumably).
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Gerhard Sittig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 1
I have stumbled onto a problem with the bridging code (options BRIDGE) with
IPFIREWALL. Please review my beautiful ASCII art below.
Internet
|
--
| Host A |
--
|
| 24.2.0.1
/ \
No, sorry.
Host A 24.2.0.1
Host B 24.2.0.2
Host C 24.2.0.3
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "David Wolfskill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: Bridge and IPFW woes ..
This is as of about 1 hour ago cvsup (about 9AM CST 02-05-2001):
cc -O -pipe -march=i686 -mcpu=i686 -Wall -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wne
sted-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winl
ine
-Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I
I use ncftp3:
% mkdir freebsd && cd freebsd
% ncftp3 releng4.freebsd.org
ncftp> cd /pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/4.2-20010213-STABLE
ncftp> bin
ncftp> get *.TXT *.inf
ncftp> get -R bin catpages compat1x compat20 compat21 compat22 compat3x
crypto dict
ncftp> get -R doc floppies games info manpages p
There is nothing in LINT about this. What is it that you are referring too?
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Alexandr A. Listopad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#x27; uses.
>
> Also, the NAT in ipfilter is kernel based so it's quite fast.
>
> - Mike H.
>
>From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:46:43 -0600
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>charset="iso-8859-1&
I just realized that I have received all these emails and I was beginning to
post again bah! What is going on that is causing these all to be
resent to the list?
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thomas T. Veldhou
Seems to be a problem with FreeBSD and APM on VIA chipsets. Are you using
this combination?
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "David Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 4:10 PM
Subject: microcputime?
> Booted this eve
It appears that the last RC just became available yesterday. Is the 4.3
RELEASE still planned for today? If so, when? I would really like to get a
build done and there seems to be a need for the "RELEASE" title on the
upgrade. Plans to follow the RELEASE branch for bugfixes I guess.
Thanks in
Did you set the receive window high on the client machine? If so, you might
try doing it on the NAT machine as will.
Create /etc/sysctl.conf with the following in it:
# begin /etc/sysctl.conf
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=64240
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=32120
# end /etc/sysctl.conf
This is probably a ra
: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: Should IPFilter be pulled from FreeBSD as well
> On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 09:15:50 -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>
> > It is being pulled
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 07:51:33AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> > It works as expected using the GENERIC kernel.
>
> Because when there is no firewall in the kernel and firewall_enable is
> not set to "YES", there is no firewall loaded. This behavior would no
What would the expected functionality be for this?
ipfw_enable=no
ipfw_firewall_enable=yes
And what would the expected funcationality be for this?
ipfw_enable=yes
ipfw_firewall_enable=no
I would expect the former to not load the ipfw module, so what does the
firewall enable option do?
I would
I have also seen that problem when I built world with too much optimization.
I now stick with -O -pipe -march=i686 -mcpu=i686.
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "mikea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mario Pranjic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wedn
FYI -- Most CDRW drives use Phillips internals.
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Wilko Bulte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thierry Herbelot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mike Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13
There seems to be no traffic at all on stable, current, security or java.
Highly unlikely event. Majordomo does not answer requests either. What is
going on?
Tom Veldhouse
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
The only problem I see with this is that anybody following this particular
RELEASE has to follow CURRENT, which is almost a contradiction of terms.
Tom Veldhouse
>
> Therefore, the release engineering team will only create the 5-STABLE
> branch in the CVS repository after they have found a relati
A branch or a tag? I don't believe it was branched.
Tom Veldhouse
- Original Message -
From: "Oliver Fromme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: 5.0-STABLE ???
> Thomas T. Veldhouse <[EMAIL
t will not be branched from current for at least 3 to 6 months.
Tom Veldhouse
- Original Message -
From: "Oliver Fromme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: 5.0-STABLE ???
> Thomas T. Veldhouse <[EMAIL
I believe you need this in your kernel at a bare minimum. I don't know if
atapicam is supported in FreeBSD 4.x. It certainly is in 5.x.
# ATA and ATAPI devices
deviceatapicam
# SCSI peripherals
device scbus # SCSI bus (required)
device da # Direc
When do the ports get "unfrozen" now that FreeBSD 5.3 has been tagged as
RELEASE [via /usr/src/UPDATING]? There are several ports that I would
like to see upgraded [like dspam] to the more recent levels and I have
been told that they are waiting out the freeze.
--
Thomas T. Vel
> If you run a FreeBSD box with local time in the system clock (which of
> course you have to to make doze have the correct time), it does the
> same thing.
>
> Boot both after a timechange, you get 2 hours difference, 1 from each.
>
> On my dualboot boxes I turn off automatic time changes in doz
et to IRQ 5
and 10. They do not conflict with any other hardware that I am aware of.
Like I said - it is working great now.
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Daniel C. Sobral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Thomas T. Veldhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[
>
> Just beware that it may spontaneously reboot your machine.
>
Why would it do that? Did it do that for you?
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
I have a Hewlett Packard CD-Writer Plus 9100 internal ATAPI burner. I
also have the VIA 82C686 chipset (ATA66). I get the following error when
I try to blank a CD(RW), 8x/4x media.
# burncd -f /dev/acd1c -s 4 blank
blanking CD, please wait..
burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCBLANK): Input/output error
The c
46 matches
Mail list logo
