I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the .508
BIOS file).
Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have the same problem. When i
downloaded
the BIOS from the Supermicro website on May 23 the included AMI.BAT only
updated the BIOS
and not the Intel ME BIO
this.
Sebastian Stach
Am 05.06.2012 um 20:39 schrieb Johan Hendriks:
> Thanks for the pointer.
> But my ami.bat file from the just downloaded .508 (2.0) firmware is the same
> as the one i used.
>
> this is my ami.bat
> @echo off
>
> REN AFUDOSU.SMC AFUDOSU.EXE
>
> A
they know about problems with the nics and the BIOS
version 2.0
but that the new update should fix it.
Which BIOS version do you have?
Sebastian Stach
Am 05.06.2012 um 22:16 schrieb Miroslav Lachman:
> There is a differenc between X9SCM-F and X9SCA-F. The SCM version has 82579V
> and 82574L
The default was that IPMI is shared with the Intel NIC but i configured it to
use the dedicated interface.
Sebastian Stach
Am 05.06.2012 um 23:21 schrieb Miroslav Lachman:
> The board had BIOS 1.1a with build date 2011-09-28 so I updated it to version
> 2.0 with build date 2012-05-08.
Thanks for doing the test.
My conditions are different in that i have a gigabit network.
The only difference in the iperf options is that i'm using
-d (dualmode).
On the weekend i will have time to do a test with the NICs
set to 100MBit.
Sebastian Stach
Am 06.06.2012 um 12:18 schrieb Mir
mode for remote
> management. Can you try your test with shared mode?
>
> Miroslav Lachman
I did a test on my system again. My second NIC is working without problems
but the first one is still hanging after a while even when configured in shared
mode.
I will contact the sup
When using pkg_version with the -o argument to print the origin
instead of the package name it doesn't work correct.
# pkg_version -o
(output stripped)
x11/xorg=
x11/xorg=
x11/xorg=
(output stripped)
The output sh
