;
>ugen1.2: at usbus1
>umass0: on
>usbus1
>umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x4001
>umass0:2:0:-1: Attached to scbus2
>da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0
>da0: < USB FLASH DRIVE PMAP> Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device
>da0: 40.000MB/s transfers
&
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:56:24 -0800 Kevin Oberman
wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> =A0 =A0 On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:34:36 +0700 Erich Dollansky
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I got a new thumb drive which was FAT formatted. I use this script t
her than get stuck with a logo on the screen
that never
goes away. Unfortunately, it includes no software to burn a CD or DVD, so I
cannot
make a new bootable disk for the time being. I will check email much later
today or
this evening.
Thanks in advance for any helpful ideas!
On Sat, 18 May 2019 08:02:20 -0500 Scott Bennett wrote:
> I have been running 11.2-STABLE for a while at r345498. Last weekend it
> crashed,
>so I took the opportunity to install the most recent build I had lying around,
>r347182.
>I created a new boot environment an
Matt Garber wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 9:00 AM Scott Bennett wrote:
>
> >
> > Many, many thanks to the person who responded with the solution to
> > get past the
> > loader crash!! My system is now getting work done again, and the rest of
> > th
nd fixed yet, though, so I have temporarily returned to
setting vm.kmem_size_max, which does seem to be honored.
Anyway, thanks for bailing me out yesterday. The system is now
somewhat usable while I satisfy my curiousity and should be fully usable
upon reversion, which will probably
complaining on
this list and possibly -questions within the first few days after the
release date.
Thanks in advance for any help with this problem!
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
Eugene,
Thank you very much for the fast reply!
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 09.11.2019 19:45, Scott Bennett ?:
> > The rest of this message was posted a little while ago to the
> > freebsd-questions list by mistake. It was intended for freebsd-stable,
> > so I a
you told it to do. If you want the data set destroyed in the background,
you will need to include the "-d" option in the command. (See the zfs(1)
man page at defer_destroy under "Native Properties".)
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 30.11.2019 0:57, Scott Bennett wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 23:18:37 +0700 Eugene Grosbein
> > wrote:
> >
> >> 28.11.2019 20:34, Steven Hartland wrote:
> >>
> >>> It may well depend on the extent of the d
ory management bugs first caused
big problems starting when 11.2 happened, so I may have missed some of the
transition due to infrequent system updates. I only remember that it won't say
it's 11.4-STABLE until the release happens and I've updated /usr/src and built
and
installed a new system.
the buildworld
failure.
If anyone else can see what's wrong and clue me in, I'd be grateful.
I'm subscribed to the digest for this list, so please Cc: me directly, so
I'll get replies right away.
Thanks in advance!
Kevin Oberman wrote:
Thanks much for replying!
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>
> > I'm running into a problem in updating my 10-STABLE system from
> > source.
> > A "make buildworld" quits immediately. I tried a fresh
"Matthew D. Fuller" wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:13:02PM -0700 I heard the voice of
> Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus:
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
> >
> > > "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1", line 11
I wrote:
>"Matthew D. Fuller" wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 10:13:02PM -0700 I heard the voice of
>> Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus:
>> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> >
>> > >
d ZFS is that the two remaining entries in a formerly huge directory are
likely to be in different directory blocks that could be at effectively random
locations scattered around the space of a partition for one filesystem in UFS
or over a
r priority tasks are available to run for
all CPU threads. The 4BSD scheduler handles this situation properly.
Now I'm running 10.3-STABLE on a QX9650, and I haven't tested ULE
on it to see whether it's still as flawed. If and when I get a machine
with a multi-cored, hyperthreaded
eviously. Try adding
BUILDKERNELS=PUMPKIN GENERIC
to your /etc/src.conf and removing the KERNCONF line from /etc/make.conf
before you run it again. KERNCONF goes on the "make buildkernel" command,
not into /etc/make.conf, but should not be necessary at all if /etc/src.conf
contains the l
It's more likely a race condition elsewhere.
>
Those who try to create deadlocks should not complain when they succeed.
Sigh.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: b
t;
> > On 2017-Mar-15, at 6:15 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 18:18:56 -0700 Mark Millard
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 2017-Mar-14, at 4:44 PM, Bernd Walter wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03
se you need it unchanged again.
Can zdb(8) see it without causing a panic, i.e., without importing the
pool? You might be able to track down more information if zdb can get you in.
Another thing you could try with an ad
ion table. Some USB Drives does not have valid
> partition table, they appear as /dev/da0 and can be mounted with
> mount_msdosfs /dev/da0 /mnt, but they are not recognised by
> automounter.. how can I make it work with such devices?
>
Try newfs_msdos(8).
rather than on a slice. Otherwise, create the partition table, create
a slice, and proceed.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* be
don't even
know what DIRDEPS_BUILD is.
Anyway, I'm stuck. Can someone please tell me what is going wrong and
how to fix it? I'd really like to be able to update my system, not only to
keep it reasonably current, but also to be able to customize a kernel. Thanks
in advance for any
Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:42:58 + lists wrote:
>On 22/01/2018 09:17, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> Anyway, I'm stuck. Can someone please tell me what is going wrong and
>> how to fix it? I'd really like to be
Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?
I wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:42:58 + lists wrote:
>>On 22/01/2018 09:17, Scott Bennett wrote:
>>> Anyway, I'm stuck. Can someone please tell me what is going wrong and
>>> how to fix it
Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 24 Jan 2018, at 09:51, Scott Bennett wrote:
> >
> > Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?
> >
> > I wrote:
> >>On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:42:58 + lists wrote:
> >>> On 22/01/2018 09:17, Scott
tech-lists wrote:
> On 24/01/2018 08:51, Scott Bennett wrote:
> > hellas# mv /etc/make.conf{,.save}
> > hellas# mv /etc/src.conf{,.save}
> > hellas# cd /usr/src
> > hellas# make cleandir
> > "/usr/src/share/mk/local.sys.mk", line 51: Mal
Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 12:39 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 24 Jan 2018, at 09:51, Scott Bennett wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: why does buildworld fail on stable/11 ?
> > >
> > > I wrote:
> &
Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 00:25 -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
> > Ian Lepore wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 12:39 +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 24 Jan 2018, at 09:51, Scott Bennett wrot
Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:52 +, Holger Kipp wrote:
> > Dear Scott,
> >
> > Am 26.01.2018 um 09:07 schrieb Scott Bennett
> > >:
> >
> > cd /usr/src; PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin MAKE_CMD=make
> > /usr/obj/
keep it available as an option.
At the same time, the poorly supported, obsolete, and incompatible-with-
other-system-components stuff should rightly be eliminated from the source
tree. The few known bugs with the native GEOM commands can and should be
fixed.
Scot
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 07.04.2021 12:49, Scott Bennett via freebsd-stable wrote:
>
> > At least w.r.t. gvinum's raid5, I can attest that the kernel panics
> > are real. Before settling on ZFS raidz2 for my largest storage pool, I
> > experimented with gst
w to FreeBSD to know about it?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org *
*
uction
alternatives. FreeBSD used to do better and it should be doing better now.
It is worth noting that a few years ago, FreeBSD project staff realized
that an elderly Pentium II(?) machine running FreeBSD 2.something and still
doing some simple, but necessary, task for the project had an u
Don Wilde wrote:
>
> On 7/11/20 11:28 PM, Scott Bennett via freebsd-stable wrote:
> > I have read this entire thread to date with growing dismay, and I
> > thank Donald Wilde for reporting his ongoing troubles, although they
> > spoil my hopes that the kernel'
36 matches
Mail list logo
