GCC + FreeBSD 11.0 Stable - stat.h does not have vm_ooffset_t definition

2017-04-26 Thread Patrick Powell
#if !defined(_GCC_SIZE_T) > #define _GCC_SIZE_T > typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t; > #endif > 253c266 < typedef __int64_t vm_ooffset_t; --- > typedef __vm_ooffset_t vm_ooffset_t; 255c268 < typedef __uint64_t vm_pindex_t; --- > typedef __vm_p

Re: GCC + FreeBSD 11.0 Stable - stat.h does not have vm_ooffset_t definition

2017-04-27 Thread Patrick Powell
On 04/26/17 09:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 04/26/2017 10:14, Patrick Powell wrote: First: a big thank-you to the support/fixit people for all of their work! I was doing some testing using FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE and some of my configure scripts died. However, they were working fine on FreeBSD 11.0

Re: GCC + FreeBSD 11.0 Stable - stat.h does not have vm_ooffset_t definition

2017-04-27 Thread Patrick Powell
On 04/27/17 13:59, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 04/27/2017 12:45, Patrick Powell wrote: On 04/26/17 09:34, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 04/26/2017 10:14, Patrick Powell wrote: First: a big thank-you to the support/fixit people for all of their work! I was doing some testing using FreeBSD 11.0-STABLE and

Re: lang/gcc* package builds vs. release/11.0.1/ and the future release/11.1.0 because of vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t changes and how the lang/gcc* work

2017-06-26 Thread Patrick Powell
rs wrote what original text. If that becomes an issue, it is correctable. Blame me for any errors in the above. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-po...@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-po