On 02/14/11 19:21, Ted Faber wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:52:43PM -0800, Chris H wrote:
I noticed a potential issue in the output of your attached Xorg.conf.
Can you tell me what looked fishy? I'm happy to poke it it.
Bottom line (for me anyway) has been that if I disable hald(8), I ha
On a Dell PowerEdge 1950, BIOS from 2007, a freshly installed WD 3 TB
SATA 6GB harddrive doesn't get recognized as 3 TB disk, it is reported
as 2TB disk only.
The box is running FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE (see below the dmesg excerpt). The
drive is configured as ZFS pool on top of a GPT partition.
On 06/29/11 15:57, Joshua Boyd wrote:
2011/6/29 O. Hartmann mailto:ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de>>
Questions:
a) Is this an issue of FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE or is it a firmware/BIOS
issue which can be solved?
Hi Oliver,
Neither, unfortunately. The 1068E based cards do not support
Hello.
I realised something weird in FreeBSD 10.-CURRENT/amd64 (CLANG
compiled), build as from today (buildworld).
Working the whole day coding some pyhton scripts and committing the code
to my subversion server (most recent subversion from the ports
collection, the server is a FreeBSD 9.0-RC1/amd
Am 11/03/11 23:48, schrieb Jeremy Chadwick:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 11:17:08PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Hello.
>> I realised something weird in FreeBSD 10.-CURRENT/amd64 (CLANG
>> compiled), build as from today (buildworld).
>>
>> Working the whole d
> Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn't an
> issue. And yes, there are cases where SCHED_ULE shows much better
> performance then SCHED_4BSD. [...]
Do we have any proof at hand for such cases where SCHED_ULE performs
much better than SCHED_4BSD? Whenever the subject c
On 12/12/11 18:06, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 04:18:35PM +, Bruce Cran wrote:
>> On 12/12/2011 15:51, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>> This comes up every 9 months or so, and must be approaching FAQ
>>> status. In a HPC environment, I recommend 4BSD. Depending on the
>>> workload, ULE
On 12/12/11 16:13, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>
> On 12/12/2011 13:47, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>>> Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn't an
>>> issue. And yes, there are cases where SCHED_ULE shows much better
>>> performance then SCH
On 12/12/11 16:51, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:47:57PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>
>>> Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn't an
>>> issue. And yes, there are cases where SCHED_ULE shows much better
>>> perfor
On 12/14/11 18:54, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:06 AM, George Mitchell
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Secret Masters of FreeBSD: Can we have a decision on whether to
>> change back to SCHED_4BSD while SCHED_ULE gets properly fixed?
>>
>
> Please do not do this. This thread has shown that UL
Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
It may be worth to discuss the sad performance of FBSD in some parts of
the benchmark. A difference of a factor 10 or 100 is simply far beyond
disapointing, it is more than inaccepta
Am 12/15/11 14:51, schrieb Daniel Kalchev:
>
> On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Stefan Esser wrote:
>
>> Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel:
>>> No, the same hardware was used for each OS.
>>>
>>> In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was used.
>>
>> Just curious: W
Am 12/15/11 14:58, schrieb Daniel Kalchev:
>
> On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> […]
>> That said: thrown out, data ignored, done.
>>
>> Now what? Where are we? We're right back where we were a day or two
>> ago; meaning no closer to solving the dilemma reported by users a
Am 12/15/11 15:20, schrieb Steven Hartland:
> With all the discussion I thought I'd give a buildworld
> benchmark a go here on a spare 24 core machine. ULE
> tested fine but with 4BSD it wont even boot panicing
> with the following:-
> http://screensnapr.com/v/hwysGV.png
>
> This is on a clean 8.2
On 12/16/11 07:44, Joe Holden wrote:
> Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
>> wrote:
>>> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
>>>
>>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news
On 12/18/11 03:37, Bruce Cran wrote:
> On 13/12/2011 09:00, Andrey Chernov wrote:
>> I observe ULE interactivity slowness even on single core machine
>> (Pentium 4) in very visible places, like 'ps ax' output stucks in the
>> middle by ~1 second. When I switch back to SHED_4BSD, all slowness is
>>
On 12/19/11 09:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Samuel.
> You wrote 15 декабря 2011 г., 16:32:47:
>
>> Other benchmarks in the Phoronix suite and their representations are
>> similarly flawed, _ALL_ of these results should be ignored and no time
>> should be wasted by any FreeBSD committer furt
On 12/19/11 13:21, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On 19 dec 2011, at 12:50, "Samuel J. Greear" wrote:
>
>> 2011/12/19 Lev Serebryakov :
>>> Hello, Samuel.
>>> You wrote 15 декабря 2011 г., 16:32:47:
>>>
Other benchmarks in the Phoronix suite and their representations are
similarly flawed, _AL
On a freshly updated box the installation of x11/sessreg fails with the
shown message below.
On all boxes I run with FBSD 9 or 10 (all amd64, CLANG build) the build
and installation works fine.
Since I update the box from 8.2-STABLE to 9.0-PRE last night, cleaning
up all ports and having them rebu
On 12/20/11 11:13, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On a freshly updated box the installation of x11/sessreg fails with the
> shown message below.
> On all boxes I run with FBSD 9 or 10 (all amd64, CLANG build) the build
> and installation works fine.
>
> Since I update the box from 8.2
On 12/20/11 11:49, Michiel Boland wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 11:13, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On a freshly updated box the installation of x11/sessreg fails with the
>> shown message below.
>> On all boxes I run with FBSD 9 or 10 (all amd64, CLANG build) the build
>>
On 12/20/11 21:20, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> Interestingly, while people seem to be (arguably rightly) focused on
> criticising Phoronix's benchmarking, nobody has offered an alternative
> benchmark; and while (again, arguably rightly) it is important to
> benchmark real world performance, equally,
On 12/20/11 22:45, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
> http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
>
> PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on FreeBSD, DragonFly, Linux
> and Solaris. Steps to reproduce these benchmarks provided.
>
> Sam
>
> On Tue, Dec 20
On 12/21/11 00:29, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:54:23PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On 12/20/11 22:45, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
>>> http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
>>>
>>> PostgreSQL
On 12/21/11 19:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while the discussion continued here, some work started at some other place.
> Now... in case someone here is willing to help instead of talking, feel free
> to go to http://wiki.freebsd.org/BenchmarkAdvice and have a look what can be
> imp
On 12/23/11 16:24, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:00:05AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Thursday, December 22, 2011 6:58:46 pm Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:44:14AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>>> On 12/21/11 19:41, Alexa
On one of my FreeBSD 9.0 boxes running FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 (CLANG
built), equipted with a nVidia GT760Ti graphics board, loading the
nvidia module via /boot/loader.conf results in a page fault with random
error messages before rebooting.
Booting the box without the nvidia.ko module loaded in
th clang. Perhaps it's a clang
> issue?
>
> Ciao,
> Christian.
>
> On Tuesday 03 January 2012 11:15:20 O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On one of my FreeBSD 9.0 boxes running FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 (CLANG
>> built), equipted with a nVidia GT760Ti graphics board, loading the
&g
On FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 (recent build today, r232207), issuing
"netstat on console or in terminal doesn't give the usual netstat as
expected, instead I receive
netstat: no namelist
What's wrong?
Regards,
Oliver
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 02/27/12 16:29, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 03:53:48PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 (recent build today, r232207), issuing
>> "netstat on console or in terminal doesn't give the usual netstat as
>> expe
On 02/27/12 16:29, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 03:53:48PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE/amd64 (recent build today, r232207), issuing
>> "netstat on console or in terminal doesn't give the usual netstat as
>> expe
On 03/03/12 07:44, H wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> [...] Sure,
>> our strength is servers, and that is not going to change.
I agree and disagree. Based upon the struggle with desktop usage and
focus on development, FreeBSD is de facto more server oriented. But in
comparison to several other non-
Back to the topic of the initial posting:
Where can I find documentation for the "idiot" about flowtable? I can
switch this to "ON" in the kernel config on FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE as well
as in FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT. But I can not find any hint what it is
supposed to do, what benefit it could provide or
on 03/03/2012 13:44 O. Hartmann said the following:
> Back to the topic of the initial posting:
>
> Where can I find documentation for the "idiot" about flowtable? I can
> switch this to "ON" in the kernel config on FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE as well as
> in FreeB
On 05/28/12 09:33, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 09:17+0200, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
>
>> sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -o root -g wheel -m 444 ru_RU.KOI8-R.cat
>> /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/share/nls/ru_RU.KOI8-R/libc.cat
>> sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -o root -g wheel -m 444 sk
On 06/01/12 21:46, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 08:32:08PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 1 June 2012 16:20, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Dear All ,
There is a thread
"Why Are You Using FreeBSD ?"
I think another thread with the specified subject '"
On 06/02/12 14:47, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 02.06.12 15:32, Erich wrote:
>> I know that the ports tree is a moving target. But it stops moving
>> during the release period. This could be used to give a fall back
>> solution.
>>
>> Or do I see this really too simple?
>
> The ports tree is a
On 06/03/12 15:29, Erich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03 June 2012 PM 5:14:10 Adam Strohl wrote:
>> On 6/3/2012 11:14, Erich wrote:
>>> What I really do not understand in this whole discussion is very simple. Is
>>> it just a few people who run into problems like this or is this simply
>>> ignored by the
On 06/03/12 15:12, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Adam Strohl
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/3/2012 17:51, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>>
>>> Always I am stressing that to manage FreeBSD, a fair amount of expertise
>>> is required which I think this level may be reduced by im
On 06/04/12 17:24, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 3 June 2012 21:55, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On 06/03/12 15:29, Erich wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 03 June 2012 PM 5:14:10 Adam Strohl wrote:
>>>> On 6/3/2012 11:14, Erich wrote:
>>>>> What I r
On 06/09/12 06:45, Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 6/9/2012 3:34, Steve Franks wrote:
>> Every time libjpeg or
>> perl or python bumps the rev, I have to explain to my boss that I
>> won't be using my computer for 48 hours.
Lucky man! We are "off" from some desktop services (like LibreOffice and
Firefox)
On 06/09/12 15:43, Adam Strohl wrote:
> On 6/9/2012 14:50, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Lucky man! We are "off" from some desktop services (like LibreOffice and
>> Firefox) for more than a week now!
>
> Why did you update to begin with? Bug/security fix
On 06/10/12 12:37, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 10 June 2012 11:12, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
>> Am Sat, 09 Jun 2012 21:09:09 +0700
>> schrieb Adam Strohl :
>>
>>> I get the feeling people are updating their ports tree and then
>>> recompiling/reinstalling everything "just because" and then are
>>> compla
On 06/10/12 17:43, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
> On 06/10/12 09:54, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
>> Am Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:37:09 +0100
>> schrieb Chris Rees:
>>
>>> Er... people always test their commits. Sometimes edge cases will
>>> creep in, such as the libreoffice failure which was due to diffe
On 06/10/12 19:20, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 10 June 2012 18:10, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On 06/10/12 17:43, John Merryweather Cooper wrote:
>>> On 06/10/12 09:54, Martin Sugioarto wrote:
>>>> Am Sun, 10 Jun 2012 11:37:09 +0100
>>>> schrieb Chris Rees:
>>
Since I performed a make buildworld and installed everything and after
an update of the ports tree (with which lighttpd was updated from
lighttpd-1.4.26 to lighttpd-1.4.26_1 I receive this error when trying to
start lighttpd:
2010-05-27 09:34:56: (network.c.529) SSL:
error::lib(0):fun
Problem: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE/amd64 crashes with radeon and radeonhd in
different, weird ways.
I figured out when changing a box from a single-core hardware platform
with FBSD 8.1-STABLE/amd64 UP kernel to a SMP kernel with a dul core CPU
that a former 'stble' arragemnet of a AMD HD4830 and radeon
On 09/19/10 08:20, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2010-Sep-15 22:29:46 +0200, Eivind E wrote:
That has crossed my mind aswell, the only thing which makes me doubt
it is that after updating X number of months ago (probably about a
year and a half), it started to work with no problems whatsoever.
Now, af
On 10/26/10 04:14, Denise H. G. wrote:
On 2010/10/26 at 06:37, Chip Camden wrote:
After a csup, building the GENERIC kernel on amd64 fails with:
Exactly the same here, but with a custom kernel on 8-STABLE amd64.
make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES | MKDEP_CPP="cc -E"
CC="cc" xa
On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1
Well,
it would be nice to have those improvements in FreeBSD, but I doubt this
will make it in due tim
On 11/18/10 19:28, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
that Linux's
On 11/18/10 19:55, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
pattern
and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP an
I also needed to comment out "options MAC" preventing the kernel build
to stop premature (although I included options KDTRACE_HOOKS in the
kernel config file).
Dimitry Andric wrote:
Hi,
When I build -STABLE as of today, with only option SMP commented out in
GENERIC, I get the following error:
Too late for me, after a corrupted installworld dur to some unawareness
my box is broken that way that I can't load zfs.ko anymore and so I
can't mount ZFS pools. Trying to recompile everything ends up in a trap
6, which indicates to me a broken compiler :-(
That's fun ...
Robert Watson wrote
Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/Kostik (Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:04:32 +0300) *
| cd into /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1,
| and do
| make install DEBUG_FLAGS=-g
That simple thing didn't work for me:
make install DEBUG_FLAGS=-g
install -o root -g wheel -m 555 cc1 /usr/libexec
ins
O. Hartmann wrote:
Alex Goncharov wrote:
,--- You/Kostik (Wed, 27 Aug 2008 19:04:32 +0300) *
| cd into /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1,
| and do
| make install DEBUG_FLAGS=-g
That simple thing didn't work for me:
make install DEBUG_FLAGS=-g
install -o root -g wheel -m 555
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Dan Allen wrote:
Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing builds. I
tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no avail.
My 7.0 box upgraded fine this morning:
FreeBSD ids.eagle.ca 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Aug
29 11:38:12 EDT 2008 [
Kris Kennaway wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Dan Allen wrote:
Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing builds.
I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no avail.
My 7.0 box upgraded fine this morning:
FreeBSD ids.eagle.ca 7.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 7.1
Kris Kennaway wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Dan Allen wrote:
Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing
builds. I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no avail.
My 7.0 box upgraded fine this morning:
FreeBSD
O. Hartmann wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Dan Allen wrote:
Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing
builds. I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no avail.
My 7.0 box upgraded fine this
Kris Kennaway wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Dan Allen wrote:
Well I got bit by this and am dead in the water. Nothing
builds. I tried the DEBUG_FLAGS=-g trick but to no
Just upgraded my ports and installed the new xf86-video-nv driver. Well,
loggin out works now without crashing the Xorg server, but most fonts
now show up as balck bars - unreadable and ugly :-(
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Just upgraded my ports and installed the new xf86-video-nv driver.
Well, loggin out works now without crashing the Xorg server, but most
fonts now show up as balck bars - unreadable and ugly :-(
Same for me, just some transparent pictures render
Florian Smeets wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
Just upgraded my ports and installed the new xf86-video-nv driver. Well,
loggin out works now without crashing the Xorg server, but most fonts
now show up as balck bars - unreadable and ugly :-(
flz@ has committed an updated version (2.4.2) an hour ago
Andriy Gapon wrote:
Question to those having this problem - what kind of nVidia hardware do
you have?
Is that something that is based on G80 GPU or later (GeForce 8XXX or later)?
I see that there is already version 2.1.12 of nv driver (in xorg
repository) that is supposed to fix CPUToScreenColorE
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## Volodymyr Kostyrko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just upgraded my ports and installed the new xf86-video-nv driver. Well,
loggin out works now without crashing the Xorg server, but most fonts
now show up as balck bars - unreadable and ugly :-(
Same for me, just some t
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## O. Hartmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Seems you've got an issue between X and firefox3; at least there's
a note in the firefox3 release notes which desribes similar effects:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411831
Oh, but by the way, it'
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
## O. Hartmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
My box at home has an older NV6800GT and I do not have this special
issue, but instead I do have another well known issue of box-freezing.
This also happens with 'nv'.
Whoa. Guess I'm lucky, as my nvidia
I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the
Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O
shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the opposite.
oh
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
Thomas Backman wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the
Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O shows
in contrast to all claims that have been to be im
Bruce Cran wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:43:15 -0800
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I haven't looked at the Phoronix Test Suite[1], which is what's being
used for testing "threaded I/O". I don't understand what "threaded
I/O" means in this context; I'm assuming it means making a separate
LWP for eac
On 01/06/10 22:25, Oliver Pinter wrote:
hi list!
$subject
the ruby port was updated, but the oniguruma patch is available only
for older ruby, end its patch hunked.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
I realise a strange behaviour of several FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 boxes.
All boxes have the most recent STABLE. One box is a UP system, two
others SMP boxes, one with a Q6600 4-core, another XEON with 2x 4-cores
(Dell Poweredge III).
Symptome: All boxes have ZFS and UFS2 filesystems. Since two
On 01/12/10 15:31, Guido Falsi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:30:56PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:54:48 +0100
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de said:
ohartman> Since friday after the last FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 update,
thunderbird3
ohartman> crashes immmediately or af
On 01/18/10 21:34, � wrote:
O. Hartmann wrote:
I realise a strange behaviour of several FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 boxes.
All boxes have the most recent STABLE. One box is a UP system, two
others SMP boxes, one with a Q6600 4-core, another XEON with 2x 4-cores
(Dell Poweredge III).
Symptome: All
On 01/19/10 10:09, krad wrote:
2010/1/18 Morgan Wesstr�m
O. Hartmann wrote:
I realise a strange behaviour of several FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 boxes.
All boxes have the most recent STABLE. One box is a UP system, two
others SMP boxes, one with a Q6600 4-core, another XEON with 2x 4-cores
(Dell
Well,
At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with which
I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots at all (ASUS
P6T6-WS Revolution) and due to the fact I'm using Windows 7 sometimes
for recreational gaming, I'd like to have a moderate expensive audio
board wi
On 01/25/10 04:19, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
At this very moment I utilise a M-Audio 5.1 PCI-audio board with
which I'm really satisfied. My next box doesn't have PCI slots
at all ... I look for the Soundblaster X-Fi range of PCIe cards,
Hello.
I set up a NFSv4 server located on a FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 box (most recent
world). It seems I successfully set up the NFSv4 service and this
results in a successful mount of a file system by another FreeBSD 8.0
box. But their is a weirdnes I do not understand.
Mounting the filessystem via
Today, I upgraded Firefox 3.5.7 (built yesterday) to Firefox 3.6. After
deleting ~/.mozilla (after I did a buckup, of course), I tried a fresh
start of 'firefox3'. After firefox showed up, I realized that no
option-field (File, Extras etc) can be used, they are dead and after a
few seconds I cl
On 02/08/10 15:08, Rick Macklem wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:
Mounting the filessystem via
mount_newnfs host:/path /path
Oh, and you should set:
sysctl vfs.newnfs.locallocks_enable=0
in the server, since I haven't fixed the local locking yet. (This implies
that
On 02/08/10 15:01, Rick Macklem wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:
Mounting the filessystem via
mount_newnfs host:/path /path
works fine, but not
mount -t nfs4 host:/path /path.
The mount command can be either:
mount -t nfs -o nfsv4 host:/path /path
or
mount -t newnfs -o
On 02/08/10 16:20, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:32:25 +
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
Today, I upgraded Firefox 3.5.7 (built yesterday) to Firefox 3.6. After
deleting ~/.mozilla (after I did a buckup, of course), I tried a fresh
start of 'firefox3'. After
On 02/08/10 22:37, Rick Macklem wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:
So I guess the above one is the more 'transparent' one with respect
to the future, when NFSv4 gets mature and its way as matured into the
kernel?
Yea, I'd only use "mount -t newnfs&quo
umped)"
you need to load the sem module (kldload sem).
To load sem on every boot put the following into your
/boot/loader.conf:
sem_load="YES"
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 9:04 PM, O. Hartmann
mailto:ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de>> wrote:
On 02/08/10 16:20, Gary Jennejohn wrot
On 02/09/10 13:54, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:41:34 +
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
[snip maybe too much]
On 02/08/10 21:42, Eitan Adler wrote:
you need to load the sem module (kldload sem).
SysV smaphore (or sem?) are built into my kernel by default. The
error/syst
On 02/10/10 00:24, Oliver Pinter wrote:
Hi all!
After updated the xorg* and dri* and dependency, the system going to
deadlock at second start of xserver. I think it is not an uniqe issue,
as others wrote them at freebsd-x11:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2010-February/009370.htm
On 02/10/10 03:41, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Christof Schulze wrote:
The situation is heavily unsatisfying, since one need an expensive
AMD/ATi Radeon card to gain non-3D poor functionality, where a cheaper
one should be do the same - but the cheaper ones don't work. Even if
one
On 02/09/10 12:54, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:41:34 +
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
[snip maybe too much]
On 02/08/10 21:42, Eitan Adler wrote:
you need to load the sem module (kldload sem).
SysV smaphore (or sem?) are built into my kernel by de
On 02/18/10 16:31, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 02/09/10 12:54, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:41:34 +
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
[snip maybe too much]
On 02/08/10 21:42, Eitan Adler wrote:
you need to load the sem module (kldload sem).
SysV smaphore (or sem?) are bui
Since the last update and make world on Friday, 12th March I get a crash
on one of my FreeBSD SMP boxes (it is always the same core message),
saying something about
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
[...]
current process: 12 (swi2: cambio)
I'm sorry not providing more informations
On 03/15/10 18:30, Matthew Fleming wrote:
Since the last update and make world on Friday, 12th March I get a
crash
on one of my FreeBSD SMP boxes (it is always the same core message),
saying something about
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode [...] current process:
12
(swi2: cambi
On 03/16/10 00:04, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 03/15/10 18:30, Matthew Fleming wrote:
Since the last update and make world on Friday, 12th March I get a
crash
on one of my FreeBSD SMP boxes (it is always the same core message),
saying something about
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Since the introduction of Thunderbird 3.0 and Firefox 3.6 I see
spontanous crashes/coredumps of both thunderbird and firefox. Interingly
Firefox 3.5.X works well on he same platform.
The platform is a FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 (r205536: Tue Mar 23 22:19:04
CET 2010), SMP box with 8GB of RAM, Qu
On 03/24/10 15:06, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:32:40 +
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
Since the introduction of Thunderbird 3.0 and Firefox 3.6 I see
spontanous crashes/coredumps of both thunderbird and firefox. Interingly
Firefox 3.5.X works well on he same platform.
Th
ed (please set CC to my email since I do
not subscribe the questions-list).
Thanks in advance,
O. Hartmann
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
TEKEN_XTERM
but I think this is for console only.
Should I file a PR?
Thanks for your patience,
O. Hartmann
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hello,
I experience also a strange lagg when using SCHED_ULE and FreeBSD 7.0 on
AMD64 platforms with and without UP. I tried to track on FreeBSD 7 from
the very early days, so I noticed some performance impacts last year
when something chenged in the scheduling. I'm not very familiar with the
I did the update of my sources as well and compiled a new world.
Then I started build_world (with SCHED_ULE) as usual - and recognized
the same stuck bahaviour under high load as usual :-( For me there is no
release of pain ...
Oliver
Unga wrote:
--- Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Am 07/30/12 20:04, schrieb Beat Siegenthaler:
> Hello,
>
> Until today, when I was asked what WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes should do.. i
> was obviously wrong:
> I think whole openssl should be replaced, but :
>
> [mym:~] # which openssl
> /usr/bin/openssl
> [mym:~] # openssl version
> OpenSSL 0.9.8x 10
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
