On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Pete French wrote:
Does it specifically have to be a vlan(4), or can you perhaps add another
address to lo(4), or perhaps create a "lo1" in addition to the "lo0"?
It can be anything really - I was looking for a "generic" interface
I can configure with IP addresses. But add
On 11/3/2011 5:24 AM, Olav Gjerde wrote:
I have the exact same problem with a LSI 3081E-R card and FreeBSD 9-Stable,
compiled yesterday.
I am too, and I'm having trouble getting smartmontools built with
debugging symbols to get a meaningful coredump. If I can sort that out
today, I'll post a
On 11/3/2011 4:09 PM, Alex Samorukov wrote:
On 11/03/2011 08:37 PM, James wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Alex Samorukov wrote:
Thank you. I currently got shell, but user-only, what is useless for
me ;-) (All ioctl/cam commands require superuser)
I asked for the root and now waiting fo
I have a Supermicro 5015A-H (Intel Atom 330) server with two Realtek
RTL8111C-GR gigabit NICs on it. As far as I can tell, these support
jumbo frames up to 7422 bytes. When running them at an MTU of 5000 on
FreeBSD 9.0-RC2, after a week or so of update, with fairly light network
activity, the
*Sometimes* when booting 9.0-RC2 on *some* of my machines, I'll get one of
the following two panics during multiuser startup, usually while running
the /usr/local/etc/rc.d scripts. (The instruction pointer is always
exactly one of these two, and they look fairly related.) If after two or
thre
On 11/27/11 8:39 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 04:05:58PM -0500, Mike Andrews wrote:
I have a Supermicro 5015A-H (Intel Atom 330) server with two Realtek
RTL8111C-GR gigabit NICs on it. As far as I can tell, these support
jumbo frames up to 7422 bytes. When running them at
On 11/29/2011 10:50 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2011 5:37:27 pm Mike Andrews wrote:
*Sometimes* when booting 9.0-RC2 on *some* of my machines, I'll get one of
the following two panics during multiuser startup, usually while running
the /usr/local/etc/rc.d scripts.
On 11/28/11 5:48 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:37:27 +0100, Mike Andrews wrote:
*Sometimes* when booting 9.0-RC2 on *some* of my machines, I'll get
one of the following two panics during multiuser startup, usually
while running the /usr/local/etc/rc.d scripts. (The instru
On 12/1/2011 6:03 PM, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 11/28/11 5:48 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:37:27 +0100, Mike Andrews
wrote:
*Sometimes* when booting 9.0-RC2 on *some* of my machines, I'll get
one of the following two panics during multiuser startup, usually
while runnin
On 12/5/11 9:39 PM, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 12/1/2011 6:03 PM, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 11/28/11 5:48 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:37:27 +0100, Mike Andrews
wrote:
*Sometimes* when booting 9.0-RC2 on *some* of my machines, I'll get
one of the following two panics d
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 12/5/11 9:39 PM, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 12/1/2011 6:03 PM, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 11/28/11 5:48 PM, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:37:27 +0100, Mike Andrews
wrote:
*Sometimes* when booting 9.0-RC2 on *some* of my machines, I'l
On 11/28/2011 6:42 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:16PM -0500, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 11/27/11 8:39 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 04:05:58PM -0500, Mike Andrews wrote:
I have a Supermicro 5015A-H (Intel Atom 330) server with two Realtek
RTL8111C-GR
On 12/30/2011 4:46 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:51:25PM -0500, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 11/28/2011 6:42 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:16PM -0500, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 11/27/11 8:39 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 04:05:58PM
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:51:25PM -0500, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 11/28/2011 6:42 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:16PM -0500, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 11/27/11 8:39 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 04:05:58PM
On 2/14/2012 3:05 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
Please don't get rid of fdisk or bsdlabel as they are (and forever will be)
required to do things like:
1. scripted formatting of a thumb drive
2. automated probing of disk information (fdisk -p)
3. Other tasks that are not suitably handled by curses-ba
On 12/7/2010 8:00 AM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Does anyone have a recommendation for one?
I am looking to connect a LTO tape drive to a FreeBSD 7 or 8 box and I've only
ever used Adaptec 19160 and similar cards and LVDS SCSI.
Our supplier has an LSI SAS3081E-R which is not outrageously expensive
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Chris H wrote:
Please take no offense. But as I look inside, the CPU does, in fact
say Motorola. The documentation for it also confirms that most of
(if not all) of the 800 series also used the Motorola RISC.
Cisco's used several CPU architectures in their IOS routers over
stuff.
Definitely practice on a scratch system first. :)
--
Mike Andrews
Server Monkey
Fark, Inc
mandr...@fark.com
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 1/19/2010 12:11 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
It seems that quite a few BIOSes have serious issues booting off disks
using GPT partitioning when no partition present is marked as
"active". See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406&cat=bin
for a prime example.
In 8.0-RELEASE, using gpart,
On 1/19/10 4:09 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
On 1/19/2010 12:11 PM, Dan Naumov wrote:
It seems that quite a few BIOSes have serious issues booting off disks
using GPT partitioning when no partition present is marked as
"active". See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406&cat=bin
for a prime
On 5/5/10 11:19 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Giulio Ferro wrote:
Giulio Ferro wrote:
Thanks, I'll try these settings.
I'll keep you posted.
Nope, it's happened again... Now I've tried to rise vm.kmem_size to 6G...
I'm really astounded at how unstable zfs is, i
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 05/10/10 11:55, Mike Andrews wrote:
On 5/5/10 11:19 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Giulio Ferro
wrote:
Giulio Ferro wrote:
Thanks, I'll try these settings.
I'll keep you posted.
Nope, it's happen
irritating NFS problem I've been
experiencing with diskless systems in every 6.x release and 7.0-RC1,
namely libc.so.6 appears to be truncated or corrupt to the client at
somewhat random times... I think it may be related to mount options,
hence the question.
Mike Andrews * [EMAIL
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Feb 04), Mike Andrews said:
Is there anything like "mount -p" that will print the current NFS
options in use? TCP vs UDP, v2 vs v3, read/write sizes etc. It
doesn't have to be in fstab format; I just need to be able
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Damian Weber wrote:
But here is the problem, pinging the machine from remote gives
A.B.C.X$ ping A.B.C.D
PING A.B.C.D (A.B.C.D): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from A.B.C.D: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.272 ms
64 bytes from A.B.C.D: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 08:48:10AM +0200, Damian Weber wrote:
From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Damian Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RELENG_6_3 ping and DUP packets
On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Damian
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 04:51:50PM +0300, Pertti Kosunen wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
And what the FAQ doesn't cover is here:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/JeremyChadwick/Commonly_reported_issues
* EIST (Intel
On 7/24/12 6:07 AM, Robert Blayzor wrote:
On Jul 23, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Bob Healey wrote:
I know I have this working, however I don't remember what I did. I know I can
pxeboot and install RHEL on a 9K frame network from a FreeBSD tftp server/NAT
gateway. I do know the first thing in my RHEL i
On 7/26/2012 2:45 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
So, I tried to do a routine update to the latest stable/9 yesterday
(r238771), and I found that access to the jail on my server had stopped
working. Everything else seemed to be fine, and reverting to the
previous system (r237456 from 2012-06-22 (Boot
On 9/19/2012 9:54 AM, Zach Leslie wrote:
HI Folks,
I've got two boxes that I recently moved from -stable to 9.1rc1. I did
them one at a time, with about a week between the upgrades. After the
first upgrade, I noticed something strange with networking but didn't
really dig into it much. After
Can anyone take a look at this bug report?
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234042
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-u
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I may have had to use the statically linked /rescue to do some things,
I don't remember. It's not completely trivial, but someone who knows
their way around a FreeBSD system can do it.
We did it by using miniroot on swap partition of the system disk.
T
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 11:21:10AM +1300, Philip Murray wrote:
"me too" on a Supermicro 5015MT+, although I notice my em0 is also sharing
an interrupt with USB (uhci3)... not sure if that's the culprit.
I'm not aware of a 5015MT+ model. Maybe you mean 5015M-MT+ or
5015M
What are the chances I can beg someone to merge the RELENG_7 version of
sys/nfsclient/nfs_diskless.c into RELENG_6 before the release(s)? :)
It would be helpful for one of my clients to be able to force a TCP mount
of the root filesystem on their diskless systems instead of UDP. Unless
I'm m
I'm seeing some regressions in the various management tools for Adaptec
AAC cards on FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 amd64.
I'm trying to use both the 32-bit FreeBSD aaccli binary from the
sysutils/aaccli port, and also the 64-bit FreeBSD arcconf from the
sysutils/arcconf port (v5.20.17414). The card is an A
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Ed Maste wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:19:15AM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 3:54 AM, Mike Andrews wrote:
Command Error:
In my experience, this was caused by the firmware rev of the adaptec
card. Basically, the combination of FreeBSD, amd64, and
Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jan 2, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
I'm not aware of any reason to avoid Adaptec RAID cards specifically on
amd64 now; there were a number of problems in the past but they should
be addressed now.
My main concern is that there is no *reliable* way to monitor the
Ivan Voras wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
* Are the issues on the list still there?
* Are there any new issues?
* Is somebody running ZFS in production (non-trivial loads) with
success? What architecture / RAM / load / applications used?
* How is your memory load? (does it leave enough memory for oth
Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
Today's stable has a problem creating a new file via NFS on ZFS.
On the NFS server, there is no problem.
% cd /ZFS
% mktemp hoge
hoge
% ls -l hoge
-rw--- 1 nyan nyan 0 5 26 19:09 hoge
But it's a problem on the NFS client.
# mount server:/ZFS /ZFS
% cd /ZFS
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Mike Andrews wrote:
Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
Today's stable has a problem creating a new file via NFS on ZFS.
On the NFS server, there is no problem.
% cd /ZFS
% mktemp hoge
hoge
% ls -l hoge
-rw--- 1 nyan nyan 0 5 26 19:09 hoge
But it's a problem
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
I've also ran into it, it's a pretty "killer" feature. :-O
Any chance for us on the fix?
It's kern/135039, fyi.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Aragon Gouveia wrote:
Hi,
Pete French wrote:
I'm not 100% sure, but fairly sure that you'll have a hard time
finding something that combines the low-power standalone type spec with
a 64-bit capable processor. Once you get the higher-end processor,
That was my experien
Somehow I've managed to get ZFS on one of my machines into a state where
it won't reclaim all space after deleting files AND snapshots off of it:
(this is with 7.2-STABLE amd64, compiled June 10)
# ls -la /weird
total 4
drwxr-x--- 2 mysql mysql 2 Jun 19 02:42 .
drwxr-xr-x 29 root wheel
Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
On 2009-06-30, Danny Braniss wrote:
This pr is realy holding me back, I can't upgrade this server, and
telling serveral tens of users to us cp, etc is not an option. The open
works fine if not using O_EXCL.
I guess that r185586 needs to be MFCd to stable/7. Here
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Danny Braniss wrote:
On 2009-06-30, Mike Andrews wrote:
Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
On 2009-06-30, Danny Braniss wrote:
This pr is realy holding me back, I can't upgrade this server, and
telling serveral tens of users to us cp, etc is not an option. The open
works
Václav Haisman wrote:
I am getting "mfi0: Copy out failed" message in logs, usually several times a
day. What does it mean? This is FreeBSD 7.2.
For what it's worth, I've noticed that running MegaCli pops out a few of
those messages, but only if I don't have the 32-bit compatibility libs
inst
I have a strange issue with em0 watchdog timeouts that I think is not the
same as the ones everyone was having during the 6.2 beta cycle...
I have six systems, each with two Intel GigE ports onboard:
Systems A and B: Supermicro PDSMi+
Systems C and D: Supermicro PDSMi (without the plus)
System
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/16/07, Mike Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a strange issue with em0 watchdog timeouts that I think is not the
same as the ones everyone was having during the 6.2 beta cycle...
I have six systems, each with two Intel GigE ports onboard:
Systems A
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 1/16/07, Mike Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a strange issue with em0 watchdog timeouts that I think is not the
same as the ones everyone was having during the 6.2 beta cycle...
I have six systems, each with two Intel GigE ports onboard:
Systems A
SCSI/SAS system I may
have to do some serious evaluation of what's new out there...
--
Mike Andrews * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.bit0.com
It's not news, it's Fark.com. Carpe cavy!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
LEASE. Depending on your
specific application, that could have a performance impact, no?
--
Mike Andrews * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.bit0.com
It's not news, it's Fark.com. Carpe cavy!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org ma
adam radford wrote:
Jon,
This issue should be fixed in the FreeBSD 6.X driver on the 3ware
web-site (9.4.1 codeset). We need to send a kernel patch to update
the in-kernel 6.X driver to the latest version.
I submitted kern/106488 back in December when the first 9650SE
compatible driver was p
here another solution for this case?
We had the same problem with our netboot cluster, and going from
RELENG_5_4 (5.4-RELEASE) up to RELENG_5 (5-STABLE) fixed it.
Mike Andrews * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.bit0.com
It's not news, it's Fark.com. Carpe cavy!
P4C800-E Deluxe board, so I'm running the twa card in a
32-bit slot. The system is otherwise totally idle when this happens, no
interrupt storms, USB and Firewire disabled in the BIOS so we don't have
IRQs shared with Giant-locked drivers...
dmesg, vmstat -i, other stuff avai
with something Maildir-based a
little higher up my priority list...)
Mike Andrews * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.bit0.com
It's not news, it's Fark.com. Carpe cavy!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
me broken nameservers
> will return SERVFAIL (a temporary failure) on T_ (IPv6)
> lookups. If you want to excuse this behavior, use this new
> flag. Suggested by Chris Foote of SE Network Access and
> Mark Roth of the Un
56 matches
Mail list logo
