On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:03:26AM -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please
> list those areas with most important first to least important last ?
As mentioned by several others, once you have a single applicaiton
that dema
Google is littered with messages from people who have 6.3 systems
and can no longer upgrade ports. It appears that a recent change
requires the version of make from 6.4.
While it would be ideal if freebsd.org would build a 6.4 make on a
6.3 system and pseudo-officially support it, a reasonable al
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:57:59 +0200, Michael R. Wayne
> wrote:
>
> >Google is littered with messages from people who have 6.3 systems
> >and can no longer upgrade ports. It appears that a recent change
>
One of our servers, running a bunch of jails, has issues when doing
nightly dumps only if snapshots are enabled. This box was running
5.X and has been upgraded over time to 6.3. When running 5.X, we
attempted to use snapshots on dump (-L) which resulted in almost
nightly system hangs during the d
I brought this up on irc, did not get a helpful answer.
After upgrading a machine from 8.4 to 9.3, I went to upgrade
ports/packages. Some need to be built from source as they
use non-standard options but most should be installable directly
with pkg install.
Note that both pkg and pkg-devel exh
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:06:02PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
> > Am 08.09.2015 um 22:55 schrieb Michael B. Eichorn :
> >
> > But you must reinstall everything. You upgraded your ABI going 8->9 so
> > everything needs rebuilt/reinstalled. See next.
>
> Exactly.
> Or unpack the compat8x packa
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:05:05AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>
> The subject describes my goal. I'm aware of the usual caveats - if
> there's more than one jail, no UID overlap, this will really only work in
> one jail if all jails are on the same filesystem, etc.
>
> I found a very, ver
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 06:23:09AM -0400, STeve Andre' wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2009 04:47:35 Michal wrote:
> >
> > "Comparing FreeBSD and OpenBSD, FreeBSD is generally better at disk-related
> > I/O whereas OpenBSD handles net-I/O better. No test has been carried out to
> > prove this though."
>
I see to have an fdisk issue on one of our boxes with a 3ware card. Relevant
lines from dmesg:
twe0: <3ware Storage Controller. Driver version 1.50.01.002> port
0x9c00-0x9c0f mem 0xfc00-0xfc7f irq 20 at device 1.0 on pci2
twe0: 2 ports, Firmware FE8S 1.05.00.068, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:29:08AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 03.08.2006 um 07:50 schrieb Michael R. Wayne:
>
> >But, I am unable to create a third partition. Every time I do
> >that, I get:
> > ERROR: Unable to write data to disk twed0!
>
> Are there an
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:30:24AM -0800, Tejas Kokje wrote:
>
> I am upgrading by freebsd installation. While doing mergemaster, it
> didn't ask me whether it should overwrite my /etc/motd file.
>
> Is manual backing up of /etc/motd the only option or have I missed
> something in mergemaster ?
CVS today. Dual Opteron running
5.3-STABLE #3: Tue Nov 30 01:44:05 EST 2004
Following the instructions in UPDATING, I get the following,
indicating a bad kernel. 2 questions:
1) Is this a known, corrected issue as of today? I ran another
CVSUP and did not see any changed to src.
2) Mor
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 09:36:05PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
>
> What 'other vendor' have you found that makes RELIABLE SATA disks in the
> high capacity (e.g. 200-300gb) arena?
WD now makes a SATA RAID line. HIGHLY recommended by 3ware.
/\/\ \/\/
___
Hmm, this might be my problem as well. I'm running -STABLE from November:
FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #3: Tue Nov 30 01:44:05 EST 2004
but when I build a current kernel, I can't even boot!
At this point I am reluctant to upgrade anything until the
problem is determined - breaking production servers is
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 07:19:49PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
>
> > CVS today. Dual Opteron running
> >5.3-STABLE #3: Tue Nov 30 01:44:05 EST 2004
> >
> > Following the instructions in UPDATING, I get the following,
&
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 09:59:34PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >-5.x was never really for production use, in the same way 3.x never
> >was.
>
> Why do people continue to say this? Many sites have used, are still
> using, and plan to continue to use, 5.x in product
We have a nubmer of similar machines that were initiallly formated
with 6.2 before it was released and have subsequently been upgraded
to 6.2-RELEASE with no issues. So, we upgraded a 6.1 box which has
been running fine as long as the nightly dumps do not use -L to
take snapshots.
Once it was upg
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:24:35AM -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
> > We have a nubmer of similar machines that were initiallly formated
> > with 6.2 before it was released and have subsequently been upgraded
>
Let me know if there is anything else I can provide.
/\/\ \/\/
uname:
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2
conf file:
include GENERIC
ident MsenWeb
options QUOTA # Add quotas
options SMP # Support multiple pr
Nobody has any ideas on this one?
> uname:
>FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p2
>
> conf file:
>include GENERIC
>ident MsenWeb
>options QUOTA # Add quotas
>options SMP # Support multiple processors
>
Been fighting this for a while. We have an older server, running
5.4-RELEASE-p8 i386 and used primarily for email, which hangs every
couple of weeks. The hang seems to be in the disk I/O system; pings
succeed, and I can continue get a login: prompt on the console until
I enter a login at which t
We brought up a new box on a January 9th build of 4.2 stable.
Everything seemed fine until we fired up gated 3.6 public (current
port). gated comes up properly but it won't talk OSPF at all (other
OSPF routers never see any OSPF packets and gated_dump shows no
OSPF activity). The config file is
I started to look through the kernel code for keyboard detection
with plans toward having a sysctl that forces the keyboard at run
time, rather than kernel compile. But I got sidetracked.
Related problems come up so often that I am convinced that such a
fix is required. Me finding time to imple
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:17:31AM +1000, Gregory Bond wrote:
> I've had this happen to
> > me when the KVM doesn't _really_ support the mouse I'm using, e.g. using
> > an IntelliMouse Explorer with any Belkin KVM I've ever tried.
>
> Naturally, it
24 matches
Mail list logo
