Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ?

y a pity. I'm using FreeBSD since version 2.05 and was never disappointed. Best regards Matthias -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette, Berlin (Germany)

NFS-Locking problem with 6.4/7.1-RELEASE

s mentioned, a new, non-productive server is available in the moment, so tests are easily possible. TIA Matthew -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette, Berlin (Germany)

Re: NFS-Locking problem with 6.4/7.1-RELEASE

it showed endless requests from the client to release a lock and equally endless error-replies... At least I would expect that an error like that in kern/130628 would look like what I observed today - but I may fail. Thanks for your reply - Matthew -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette, Berlin (Germany)

Re: removing external usb hdd without unmounting causes reboot?

est of *vinum* (without the "g") years ago when I pulled the plug on one of the disks of a RAID5-plex... Obviously there's no change at all concerning this problem. - -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette, Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F -B

NFS-Locking problems

- Matthew -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette, Berlin (Germany)

Junk Pointer Error

- -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette, Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFE7KW3f1BNcN37Cl8RAl3fAJsEtqiV7ttVyUruuEkWsZ130kyV0QCdHF7N BkxAziq+7G6A/WtnSZkQNjo= =FElW -EN

Re: Junk Pointer Error

o compile krb5 on my laptop - a different machine, which should not have the same memory problems... - -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette, Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFE7LJif1BNcN37Cl8RAim

Re: Junk Pointer Error

error! I think it's *very* unlikely, that two machines have exactly the same HW problems... Matthew - -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette, Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ?

initialisation of a newly created RAID5-Plex as well as for recalculating parity informations on a degraded RAID5-Plex. It's that simple (at least for me on 5-STABLE) but admittedly undocumented. -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0

Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ?

angling vnode'-problem with "vinum-classic": Try to start 'classic' vinum *after* the system has come up. Either manually or perhaps with a script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d. This works for me until now under 5-STABLE (a.k.a. RELENG_5). -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuen

Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ?

Am Sonntag, 7. November 2004 06:30 schrieb secmgr: > On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 04:16, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > > Did you try to simply 'start' the plex? This works for > > initialisation of a newly created RAID5-Plex as well as for > > recalculating parity inform

Re: freebsd 5.3 have any problem with vinum ?

27;t mean that I'm not trying to help to get gvinum to the place and state where it deserves to be... :-) -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: gvinum again?

s. I use (g)vinum primarily as a LVM with concat plexes on ProLiant Servers with SmartRAID-Controllers, so mirroring and/or RAID5 is done in hardware. The extension of filesystems on concat plexes works (simply) as advertised... :-) At least *I* had no problems so far. -- Ciao/BSD - M

Re: gvinum again?

Hi, Am Montag, 15. November 2004 19:41 schrieb Paul Mather: > On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 19:33 +0100, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > > The extension of filesystems on concat plexes works (simply) as > > advertised... :-) At least *I* had no problems so far. > > That's enc

Re: FreeBSD 5.3 and vinum upgrade #2

n offest of "0" (zero) within the slice (da0/da1) or disk (ad0) respectively. *If* that's the case (i.e. Offset of 0 for the vinum partitions), you have a problem indeed but otherwise I would not expect any problems. -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany

Re: FreeBSD 5.3 and vinum upgrade #2

#x27;s little more you can do to > get the "failed" drive recognised as being in the "up" state other > than to reboot. [...] 'gvinum setstate' was MFCed from -current together with 'gvinum checkpatity' and 'gvinum rebuildparity' a week ago

Re: FreeBSD 5.3 and vinum upgrade #2

ar now... > Perhaps I am ignorant, but it seems to me it would have been easier > to make the regular vinum diver handle geom drives in place of making > a new kernel object? Or perhaps theres a technical reason for not > doing so? Exactly that's the case. If you have to use a c

Re: FreeBSD 5.3 and vinum upgrade #2

fix the disks for geom_vinum compability, or do they need > to be rebuilt from the ground up? I don't know any hints any more, sorry. I send a pointer to [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is the creator of geom_vinum, because he follows -current and not -stable AFAIK. -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias

load values

ns the number of processes in the system run queue averaged over various periods of time." So - what's going on here? -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F ___ freebsd-stable@freebs

Re: load values [SOLVED]

Hello, Am Samstag, 5. Februar 2005 21:06 schrieb Dominique Goncalves: > I have had the same problem exactly today. > Re cvsup your src tree and rebuild kernel and world solved this > problem. Yes, indeed. Thanks a lot! -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany

Re: (g)vinum with 5.3

tem has come up and the main partitions are mounted. If all these points don't leed to an solution, perhaps contact Lukas Ertl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) directly, which is the maintainer of gvinum... -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0

Re: (g)vinum with 5.3

now mounted with > /usr) is already known. Well, dont know what gvinum is tying to tell > me here. What?! Did you mount it? Or is it still mentioned in /etc/fstab but not mounted any more... If you *did* mount /dev/ad0s1e as /usr you should start from the beginning reading the vinum(8) man

ABI broken for 5.4-PRERELEASE?

Hi, yesterday (MAR02,2005) I updated to 5.4-PRERELEASE. Since then, 'xsysinfo-1.4a' doesn't run anymore. The error message is: "xsysinfo: undefined symbol: _nfiles" I had the belief, that this does not happen within a major release of FreeBSD... isn't it? --

Re: [SOLVED] ABI broken for 5.4-PRERELEASE?

Hi Scott, Thanks for you reply. Am Freitag, 4. März 2005 06:10 schrieb Scott Long: > Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > > > > The error message is: "xsysinfo: undefined symbol: _nfiles" > > > > I had the belief, that this does not happen within a major release

amd(8) on port 631??

Hi, since the last system update today (5.4-PRERELEASE) the automountdaemon amd(8) grabs port tcp/631 which prevents cupsd(8) from starting which in turn prevents smbd(8)/SAMBA from starting. How come? Have I overlooked something? -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin

Re: amd(8) on port 631?? [SOLVED]

Hi Sean, Am Sonntag, 13. März 2005 05:33 schrieb Sean Winn: > On 13/03/2005, at 10:00 AM, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > > Hi, > > > > since the last system update today (5.4-PRERELEASE) the > > automountdaemon > > amd(8) grabs port tcp/631 which prevents cu

mpt + gvinum on 6.0-BETA

me to test, this machine should become a Windoze printserver in about two or three weeks... It seems to me that the HP DL380 is still the better machine... :-/ - -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette, Berlin (Germany) PG

Re: mpt + gvinum on 6.0-BETA (boot -v)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 15.07.2005 um 15:45 schrieb Matthias Schuendehuette: I tried 6.0-BETA on one of our FUJITSU-SIEMENS RX300 S2 servers and it seems that I have problems with the disk subsystem, even after Scotts major overhaul of the mpt drivers... I'

Re: mpt + gvinum on 6.0-BETA (dmesg)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 15.07.2005 um 15:45 schrieb Matthias Schuendehuette: I tried 6.0-BETA on one of our FUJITSU-SIEMENS RX300 S2 servers and it seems that I have problems with the disk subsystem, even after Scotts major overhaul of the mpt drivers... I'

Re: Quality of FreeBSD

ITSU-SIEMENS RX300 S2)... what was my fault here? Should I post to -current instead? - -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette, Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFC3+wAf1BNcN37Cl8RAkgOA

Re: Quality of FreeBSD

aviour to use proven technology[TM] and let the cheap toys for the Linux-kiddies. It remains true: You get what you pay for! - -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette, Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version

Panic in 6-BETA1 during mount

7;m ready to test/try out. -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

vinum(?) strange behaviour (4.4-PRE)

-PRE Issue, but at least, it happens now. Can anybody confirm this? BTW: I have my /usr/obj on a vinum RAID5-volume and it works perfectly stable! Only this shutdown-restart sequence is in the moment an absolute No-No Ciao/BSD - Matthias -- Matthias Schu

RE: Showstopper in 4.4-RC1 (SCSI)

Hi, On 19-Aug-01 Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > > there's a showstopper in 4.4-RC1 as of Sat, 18th Aug, around 18:00 UTC: > > My machine stopps booting after submitting the SCSI-Reset command to > both > of my 'sym'-Controllers. > Just for information: T

isp-device broken in 4.5-PRERELEASE

these problems, in the german bsd-newsgroup are at least two other persons with exactly the same problems... Please have a look on that issue. If I can do any further testing, I'll do it ASAP. Ciao/BSD - Matthias -- ***

Re: ATA-tags broken on STABLE (long!)

c_flags & ~CALLOUT_PENDING); 129 } 130 splx(s); 131 c_func(c_arg); 132 s = splhigh(); 133 steps = 0; 134 c = ne

Re: ATA Atapi 4.6 Release

all crap. It's obviously the best driver we *have* and obviously the most knowledgeable ATA-Programmer who's working for 'our' FreeBSD and we should appreciate that. -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Berlin (Germany) Powered by FreeBSD

Re: Software raid 1 on root partition?

1 for -STABLE, disk #2+#4 are for -current. I want to boot -stable, so I try to load the RAM-Disk Image from disk #1 - but it's crashed. How do I know what disk to use next? Please answer per Mail too, I'm reading this list via docs.freebsd.org -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schu