12/11/2001 18:23:52, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Now I have some huge filesystems on RAID partitions. To recreate
>> all their directories involves some hassle, but I would think
>> about doing it. But since these are no real but virtual disks,
>> spread over a set of disks in a hard
27/12/2001 22:48:36, Josh Tolbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a working X 4.1.0/DRI setup for my voodoo3/3000 at home
>(documentation of how I managed to get it working is at
>http://halcyon.scoundrelz.net/~hemi/dri.txt). I found a PC at work and
>decided I'd try to replicate my X
01/02/2002 21:32:51, Rahul Siddharthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Also, I was getting the above error with or without the -g flag, if I
>didn't specify optimisation. Is the kernel meant to be built always with
>-O or above?
Yes... someone mentioned on this list a while back that it's very diff
05/02/2002 05:06:39, Chris BeHanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I should think that it should be a SMOP to add some macros to vim
>to do this, given that vim is already sh-syntax aware, and rc.conf
>and rc.firewall are merely shell scripts.
My experience is that vim's shell syntax checking is
05/02/2002 15:12:50, z thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>Trying to run make installworld yesterday, with source cvsupped 2/5/2002
>at around 18:00 MST, I kept getting the following error:
>
>ln -fs ../la_LN.ISO8859-1/LC_COLLATE
>/usr/share/locale/pt_PT.ISO8859-1/LC_COLLATE
>ln -fs ..
10/06/2002 23:28:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (D J Hawkey Jr) wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> At 2002-06-10T05:30:39Z, "Yeasah Pell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I make similar recommendations with respect to Belkin and KVMs, but I
feel
>>> I shou
ring it or accomodating it seems like.
As it's running Solaris 8, it could be a 64-bit machine.
--
Matthew Whelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
cation of problem more precisely.
Other posts suggest these calls won't ever return ENOMEM based on total system
usage, as the kernel doesn't even track it. Even if they went for something in
the style of Brent's description of vswap, su
