On Oct 10, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 10:47 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Sunday, October 09, 2011 5:06:26 pm Larry Rosenman wrote:
>>> Any ideas on which side or what might be broke here?
>>>
>>> ler/MAIL-ARCHIVE/2008/12/INBOX
>>> Corrupted MAC on input.
>>> Disconn
The Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) contains an address format
identifiers as part of the frame format. This is so it could be used
as generalized solution to discover different types of addresses on a
broadcast network. For IP, the address format in the frame ought to
be (as I recall)
On Aug 2, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 11:39:20AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
...
I've been looking at nanobsd for a couple of applications and
working to
reduce the footprint of the images without hacking special rules.
With
...
If we're ever to consider bui
Perhaps there's no /etc/exports file? While exporting shared zfs file
systems doesn't require this, it looks like /etc/rc.d/mountd requires
the file to be present.
On May 19, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
2009/5/18 Михаил Кипа
I have two servers with Identical FreeBSD7.2 sy
FYI, I just did an upgrade of my RELENG_7 machine with the new ZFS
merged in, and it seems to have gone mostly trouble-free. I noticed
one weirdness that could be confusion on my part - I'm no longer
seeing snapshots when I do 'zfs list'. There's a UI change in the zfs
command, and to see
On May 21, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Louis Mamakos
wrote:
FYI, I just did an upgrade of my RELENG_7 machine with the new ZFS
merged
in, and it seems to have gone mostly trouble-free. I noticed one
weirdness
that could be confusion on my part
I built a system recently with 5 drives and ZFS. I'm not booting off
a ZFS root, though it does mount a ZFS file system once the system has
booted from a UFS file system. Rather than dedicate drives, I simply
partitioned each of the drives into a 1G partition, and another
spanning the rem
ZFS pool because a 1TB replacement you bought actually has a lower
sector count than your previous 1TB drive (since the replacement
device has to be either of exact same size or bigger than the old
device)?
- Dan Naumov
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Louis Mamakos
wrote:
I built a system re
from 6.x to 7.x successfully, though.
Louis Mamakos
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Matthew X. Economou wrote:
not very important but wouldn't it be better to set the checksum
to 0 instead of some arbitrary (?) and confusing value then ?
No, as not setting the checksum is a (minor) optimization. Setting that
field to any arbitrary constant means at least one completely
unnece
hat's necessary.
I use ipfw with my Vonage service, but there's nothing special that I do
for NAT. I don't do ipf..
Louis Mamakos
Vladimir Botka wrote:
Hello,
if your "Vonage linksys RT31P2" talks H323 try /usr/ports/net/gatekeeper
in proxy mode.
Cheers,
Vladi
11 matches
Mail list logo
