Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Hmm. This sounds like it might be workable. To make sure I understand
> your proposal:
>
> - We add a new prison ID field to the in-kernel description of each
> segment,
> semaphore, message queue, etc. This is initialized to the prison ID
> of the
> process creatin
Koen Martens wrote:
> FWIW, I already implemented this once for 5.x a while back, but
> abandoned the project due to lack of time back then. If no-one else
> is going to pick this up, i might try and dig up that code again,
> and port it to 6.x, since this feature is still quite high
Hi All,
Just a smallish issue with ipfilter and upgrading from 5.4 to 6-STABLE.
The ipfilter implementation in the 6-STABLE kernel errs on the commands
sent by the 5.4 ipf binary. This can be an issue when you are upgrading
remotely without serial console and you have IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK
e
Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 11:12, Koen Martens wrote:
Just a smallish issue with ipfilter and upgrading from 5.4 to 6-STABLE.
The ipfilter implementation in the 6-STABLE kernel errs on the commands
sent by the 5.4 ipf binary. This can be an issue when you are
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
PS. Not sure if this have anything to do with it (the message mentions CPU
time, not the clock), but I'm running a ntp daemon, to synchronize time...
Highly likely it has a Lot to do with it :-) Maybe the master time
server had `date` run manually, or otherwise shi
Nirvana wrote:
>I use the FreeBSD 6.0 Release-P3.
>I don't know which tag should my cvsup use to make my FreeBSD become the
>FreeBSD 6.0 stable?
>
>The RELENG_6 or RELENG_6_0?
>
>what is the different with the RELENG_6 and RELENG_6_0?
>
>
From
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/han
Hi All,
Yesterday night, i was going to send the message below. However,
just before pressing send, i found a solution to the problem:
disable checksum checks (ifconfig bge0 -rxcsum -txcsum). Though this
is a solution, it has me puzzled. Is this a bug^H^H^Hfeature of
6-STABLE, as it works with 5.4
Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
> Could you please run 'tcpdump -nvi bge0' while you are generating
> dns traffic (having bge0 checksum offloading on)?
>
> 'netstat -sp udp' output might be helpful too.
Sure thing, although it happens with other kinds of traffic too (in
the dump, there's some NTP for exampl
Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 11:16:31PM +0100, Koen Martens wrote:
>>Sure thing, although it happens with other kinds of traffic too (in
>>the dump, there's some NTP for example). Here's the netstat output
>>before:
>
>
> Btw, until r
David Wilhelm wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 12:09:13PM +0300, Oleg Bulyzhin wrote:
>
>>Could you please test attached patch?
>
>
>>This patch enables 'full' rxcsum offloading so ipfilter's bug should not be
>>triggered.
>
>
> FYI, the patch works for me; the checksum errors still show in tc
10 matches
Mail list logo
