Adrian Penisoara wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just to be sure: please post the dmesg part refering to ATA probes.
> Also please post the result of "sysctl hw.atamodes'; if it has a "dma" in
> the list then try a "sysctl -w hw.atamodes=pio,---,---,---" under root and
> check if the error appear again.
>
Ray Qiu wrote:
>
> Kal,
>
> I think the "make install" will do the make first and
> then install if the make hasn't been done.
> Please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Ray
> --- Kal Torak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ray Qiu wrote:
>
Philippe CASIDY wrote:
>
> On 28 Dec, Brent wrote:
>
> >
> >"ps: proc size mismatch (30624 total, 1048 chunks)"
> >
> > the machine seems to operate fine...other than the fact i cant do "ps" or
> > "top"this kind of makes things hard..
> > i was thinking of 2 ways to solve this..
> >
>
> 2. The Netscape Communicator 4.76 package (from CD 1 of
> the 4.2 set) will not install, complaining about the lack
> of a.out X libraries. The "previous" installation of
> Netscape would not start, leaving a log message of not
> being able to find ld.so.6 (iirc).
>
> /etc/make.conf has XFREE
Maarten van Schie wrote:
>
> You guys talk about a 'duel boot'. But as far as I go a duel is an
> opposition. It should be 'dual' caused by the composition.
That might be a nice situation, but as soon as there is more than one
O/S on a system they are both fighting for control, take as a prime
Donn Miller wrote:
>
> "Michael C . Wu" wrote:
>
> > "Fully functional" for a desktop implies a working sound card too.
> > This is one of of those things that does not really matter very much.
> > A good server admin will recompile and customize his kernel.
> > And a desktop user probably does
Maarten van Schie wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Kal Torak wrote:
>
> > Maarten van Schie wrote:
> > >
> > > You guys talk about a 'duel boot'. But as far as I go a duel is an
> > > opposition. It should be 'dual' caused by the c
Hiyas,
I am just wondering if gif and faith pseudo devices are needed for
anything? (Besides IPv6 stuff)
And what they are for...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Rasputin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 05:34:12AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> > At 10:07 AM 1/15/2001 +, Rasputin wrote:
> > >Incidentally, would anyone know an easy way of finding out
> > >what code has changed in the ata drivers since Christmas -
> > >other than mailing Soren of course
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Do you have the same crypting algorithm on both ends ?
> > (FreeBSD recently went to MD5 as a standard - Solaris most
> > likely is still using DES)
>
> Yes, the Solaris NIS Server is using DES. However, as we don't have
> Luc Morin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have recently started experiencing network problems on my -stable box.
>
> The last cvsup dates a few weeks back, and everything was working fine up until a
>few days ago.
>
> Strangest thing is that everything works just fine under Win98, and that when I
>re
Pete French wrote:
>
> > I had this problem too a while back, I fixed it for myself at the time
> > by removing the flags 0x1 from the atkbd0 entry in the kernel config file,
> > this can also be done via boot -c and similar, I then managed to fix it
>
> Sadly even boot -c doesnt work - that jus
David Wagner wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, João Fernandes wrote:
>
> > I have a realtek 8139 and a cable modem. I use DHCP to connect to the network
> > and my /etc/dhclient.conf has nothing on it.
> >
> > My problems are:
> > The speed of my connections are way slower in FreeBSD than ar
Hiyas,
I am hoping someone will be able to to tell me what im doing
wrong with this forwarding rules... And dont anyone complain
that this should go to a different list or there will be trouble :P
Anyway here is what I am trying to do...
I have a FreeBSD box as my gateway / firewall so it has an
> > Yeah using the redirect_port option in natd works, but I dont understand
> > why it doesnt work with ipfw... I thought natd might be stopping, but even
> > having the fwd rule before the divert to natd rule doesnt change anything..
> > Dose ipfw fwd even work to remote machines?
>
> Yes, it w
> > > I'm running 4.3 Beta on a shiny new Dell 1400. The NIC
> > > comes up as the fxp0 device. It is an embedded Intel
> > > pro 100/+
> > >
> > > The light on the switch says it is in Duplex mode.
> > > However, ipconfig -a says SIMPLEX. I've tried a
> > > different switch, but no change.
> >
>
Peter Radcliffe wrote:
>
> Kal Torak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said:
> > Hmmm... I would like OpenGL support...
>
> You want xlockmore to go really really fast ?
Some people like to play 3D games you know... IE Quake...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
Mike Harding wrote:
>
> Uh - april fools. Slashdot is owned by VA Linux or another Linux
> related company.
Yeah I know it was april fools, but like I said, the points made in
it are actualy very true... And like you say they couldnt change even
if they wanted to since they are now owned by VA
> Ok. The site is up, along with a main page that I was able to spend
> about 1 minute in creating. If we have any web developers who wish to
> enhance the site, feel free to mail me to help get the page started. If
> not, then I will get to it eventually, but I warn that it will not be in
> the n
João Fernandes wrote:
>
> Is there any available distribution of FBSD in diskettes? I was wondering how could
>I install it in a portable PC without
> CDrom :-/
Considering how many disks that would take, I think it would probably
be cheaper to buy a CD-Rom! :P
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E
Tony Landells wrote:
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> Maybe I'm just lucky, but I haven't had any problem. My 4.3 CDs
> arrived without any "intervention" on my part. Maybe a bit more
> slowly than I might have liked, but I don't need them at the moment
> so I don't really care.
>
> But then, they do say tha
Thanks for the replies, but let me make it clear what I
am saying..
There is a problem with NAT and ICQ that causes you to
go offline/online constantly, you probably wont notice
this your self if you have a high speed connection, but
trust me its happining!!! (check from another icq client
runnin
Allen Landsidel wrote:
>
> I read your problem.. now let me state that you are mistaken.
>
> ICQ does not operate this way.
>
> Let me elaborate:
>
> The first thing ICQ does is create a connection to the server. This is
> an outgoing connection to TCP port 5190 on login.icq.com.
>
> After
Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
>
> Forwarding a different range of ports doesnt seem to work without
> problems either... When I use LICQ on the gateway/nat machine
> and forward for example ports 3 - 30009 to the internal inter-
> face/ip-address of the gatewy/nat machine, file transfers seem to
Andreas Ntaflos wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 09:21:05PM -0500, Allen Landsidel wrote:
>
>>To be able to open a TCP connection to port 5190 on login.icq.com
>
> Does this work for file transfers too? /me doesn't think so. File transfers
> require direct connection, that's what the range of li
25 matches
Mail list logo
