I'm trying to setup a kerberized NFS system made of a server and a
client (both freebsd 9 amd64 stable)
I've tried to follow this howto:
http://code.google.com/p/macnfsv4/wiki/FreeBSD8KerberizedNFSSetup
But couldn't get much out of it.
First question : is this howto still valid or something mor
I forgot to mentioned that I compiled both servers with
option KGSSAPI and device crypto, and I enabled gssd
on both.
Is there anyone who was able to configure this setup?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
Thank you to all of you for your replies. I'll try next week
and let you know.
My mail server was down for a few hours, but everything should
be ok now...
Giulio.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
Thanks everybody again for your help with setting up a working
kerberized nfsv4 system.
I was able to user-mount a nfsv4 share with krb5 security, and I was
trying to do the same as root.
Unfortunately the patch I found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/rpcsec_gss.patch
fails to apply c
On 02/19/2012 02:55 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
I just updated the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/rpcsec_gss-9.patch
If you already downloaded it, please do so again, because
it had two arguments reversed in order and would not have
worked.
I think this one is correct, although I don
Months ago I reported a system freezing whenever bridge was used
with pf. This still happens now in 8.1 prerelease: after several minutes
to hours
that the bridge is active the system becomes unresponsive.
# uname -a
FreeBSD firewall1 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #0: Thu May 27
18:03:
On 28.05.2010 07:46, Giulio Ferro wrote:
I've also tried to disable all filtering:
net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip=0
net.link.bridge.pfil_member=0
net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge=0
net.link.bridge.pfil_local_phys=0
net.link.bridge.ipfw=0
net.link.bridge.ipfw_arp=0
But to no avail. It always fr
On 28.05.2010 07:46, Giulio Ferro wrote:
Would it be a good idea to try netgraph bridge?
Or the underlying implementation is the same as in if_bridge?
Months ago I reported a system freezing whenever bridge was used
with pf. This still happens now in 8.1 prerelease: after several
minutes to
Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 28 May 2010 07:46:07 Giulio Ferro wrote:
Months ago I reported a system freezing whenever bridge was used
with pf. This still happens now in 8.1 prerelease: after several minutes
to hours
that the bridge is active the system becomes unresponsive.
as I told
I have a 8.0 stable (last build around April 2010) which I use as a nfs
server : amd64, 8GB RAM, ~7TB storage.
I had a lot of grief with the (sadly) well know "kmem map too small"
bug, which really compromised the quality of the service that server
was deputed to.
There wasn't (and there still
I've got lost in all the posts concerning the nefarious kmem_size too
small bug, and I'm going finally to upgrade my system (it's currently
8.0 stable 1st May).
What is now (freebsd 8.1 last stable) the state of the art of the tuning
I should do on my system (amd64, of course)?
To put it as plai
I'm trying to setup a nfs server which uses the kerberized rpc
header, so to overcome the problem with 16 groups:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-stable@freebsd.org/msg109809.html
FreeBSD 8 amd64 stable last (yesterday)
Following the man page for nfsv4 I have compiled the kernel with
-
I've seen people discuss about this and it happened to me as well.
Freebsd 8.1 stable 25th september amd64
This server has one single boot disk with ufs + 1 array (hardware, 3ware)
which hold 2,7TB data. I've formatted the latter with ZFS.
Things seemed to work ok until I upgraded the system. On
On 10/22/2010 03:54 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 03:03:53PM +0200, Giulio Ferro wrote:
[...snip; focusing specifically on this piece...]
If I launch du -s under /zfs (host machine, not jail) I get a total space
of about 750GB, but df -h always turns up with 2,7TB space
Thanks for your kind reply, I'm forwarding it there...
Original Message
Subject:Re: NFS Client error
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:59:29 +0100
From: vol...@vwsoft.com
To: Giulio Ferro
CC: freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org, freebsd-...@freebsd.org
On 03/08/
On 09.03.2010 10:14, Daniel Braniss wrote:
Thanks for your kind reply, I'm forwarding it there...
Original Message
Subject:Re: NFS Client error
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:59:29 +0100
From: vol...@vwsoft.com
To: Giulio Ferro
CC: freebsd-hack...@freebs
I confirm this problem for another server:
stable 8 amd64 + vlan + carp
Whenever I join a bridge with a vlan interface:
ifconfig bridge0 addm vlan35
The system soon or later freezes.
This time it has happened after 3 days of normal behavior.
No logs, no dump.
On 03.03.2010 12:30, Giulio
Outset:
1 NFS server (with lockd)
2 NFS client (with lockd)
The clients serve several jails with apache, whose data (www) resides on
the server
From time to time everything seem to freeze. Then, after one minute or
so, the system
works again as nothing had happened.
In these occasions I get
Here's the setup:
server : NFS server machine (fb 8 stable amd64 )
client : NFS client machine (as above)
server and client are both sharing the same permission database through
ldap:
Both have in /etc/nsswitch.conf
...
group: files ldap
...
passwd: files ldap
This issue isn't related to ldap
On 16.04.2010 02:30, Rick Macklem wrote:
login as "giulio", but when I try to access that same dir on the
client machine
I get:
$ cd /path/to/root/dir/etc
(ok)
$ cd subdir2
subdir2/: Permission denied.
What happens is that I can access "subdir2" on the server machine when I
Yes, it should wor
On 16.04.2010 10:29, Sean wrote:
Yes, I have more than 16 groups, 22 actually...
Then there's nothing "wrong" per se, you're just hitting the fact that NFS v2
and v3 only support 16 groups on the wire. That's just the way the protocol is defined.
Ops, I didn't know that...
Is th
NFS server amd64 Freebsd 8.0 recent (2 days ago)
This server has been running for several months without problems.
Beginning last week, however, I'm experiencing panics (about 1 per day)
with the error in the subject
Current settings:
vm.kmem_size_scale: 3
vm.kmem_size_max: 329853485875
vm.kme
On 03.05.2010 13:01, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 12:41:50PM +0200, Giulio Ferro wrote:
NFS server amd64 Freebsd 8.0 recent (2 days ago)
This server has been running for several months without problems.
Beginning last week, however, I'm experiencing panics (about
Giulio Ferro wrote:
Thanks, I'll try these settings.
I'll keep you posted.
Nope, it's happened again... Now I've tried to rise vm.kmem_size to 6G...
I'm really astounded at how unstable zfs is, it's causing me a lot of
problem.
Why isn't it stated i
On 05.05.2010 09:52, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Nope, it's happened again... Now I've tried to rise vm.kmem_size to 6G...
Did you set both vm.kmem_size and vfs.zfs.arc_max, setting the latter to
something *less* than vm.kmem_size?
Yes.
After your suggestion, I set
vfs.zfs.arc_max: 375809638
On 05.05.2010 11:11, Simun Mikecin wrote:
- Original Message
I'm really astounded at how unstable zfs is, it's
causing me a lot
of problem.
Why isn't it
stated in the handbook that zfs isn't up to production yet?
Why people responsible for
Scenario : freebsd 9 stable (yesterday) amd64 on HP server with 4 nic (igb)
1 nic is connected standalone to the management switch, the 3 other nics
are connected to a switch configured for aggregation.
If I configure the first nic (igb0) there is no problem, I can operate
as I normally do and s
No answer, so it seems that link aggregation doesn't really work in freebsd,
this may help others with the same problem...
I reverted back to one link for management and one for service, and ssh
works as it should...
On 08/21/2012 11:18 PM, Giulio Ferro wrote:
Scenario : freebsd 9 s
| grep 22
On 25 Aug 2012, at 13:18, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I'll get back to you regarding link aggregation when I'm done with groceries.
We use it here in production and it works flawlessly.
On 25 Aug 2012, at 09:54, Giulio Ferro wrote:
No answer, so it seems that link aggregati
ust in case, did you enable any firewall ? (PF, ipfw)
As I already said, no. Nothing is working/active on this server, just sshd.
Thank you.
On 27 August 2012 21:22, Giulio Ferro wrote:
Hi, thanks for the answer
Here is what you asked for:
# ifconfig igb0
igb0: flags=8843 metric 0
No idea anybody why this bug happens? Patches?
On 08/29/2012 10:22 PM, Giulio Ferro wrote:
On 08/28/2012 11:12 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hi Giulio,
Just to clear things up:
igb0: 192.168.9.60/24
lagg0: 192.168.12.21/24
Yes.
Actually I notice now that the lagg0 address is different from
d to get it
working again is ifconfig down and up on one of the physical
interfaces. This is on 8.1
On 3 September 2012 19:25, Giulio Ferro wrote:
No idea anybody why this bug happens? Patches?
On 08/29/2012 10:22 PM, Giulio Ferro wrote:
On 08/28/2012 11:12 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote
On 09/11/2012 11:34 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Sep 11, 2012 2:12 PM, "Giulio Ferro" mailto:au...@zirakzigil.org>> wrote:
>
> Well, there definitely seems to be a problem with igb and lagg.
>
> igb alone works as it should, but doesn't seem to work pro
On 09/12/2012 10:51 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
Thanks for checking. I've used lagg(4) with igb, just not on 9.x.
You're right, it seems to be pointing to the igb(4) driver in 9.x
compared t
34 matches
Mail list logo
