Hi.
I recently installed 9.0-release on a brand new PC which has an i3 chip.
During the initial install I happened to use a USB keyboard from Apple.
I installed freebsd/amd64. Everything that I tried worked okay with it.
After testing a variety of things, I put the machine in a small rack I
hav
At 3:21 PM -0400 8/13/10, Robert Healey wrote:
I recently updated the central file server/router systems for a
pair of research clusters from RELENG_8_0 to RELENG_8_1. After
following the proper procedures, the network throughput when
pulling files from both machines via mxge0 is 200KB/s or les
At 1:58 AM + 1/9/09, Pete French wrote:
I have a number of HP 1U servers, all of which were running 7.0
perfectly happily. I have been testing 7.1 in it's various incarnations
for the last couple of months on our test server and it has performed
perfectly.
So the last two days I have been ro
At 2:39 PM -0500 1/9/09, Robert Blayzor wrote:
On Jan 8, 2009, at 8:58 PM, Pete French wrote:
I have a number of HP 1U servers, all of which were running 7.0
perfectly happily. I have been testing 7.1 in it's various incarnations
for the last couple of months on our test server and it has perfor
At 2:55 PM + 1/12/09, Robert Watson wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 2:39 PM -0500 1/9/09, Robert Blayzor wrote:
On Jan 8, 2009, at 8:58 PM, Pete French wrote:
I have a number of HP 1U servers, all of which were running 7.0
perfectly happily. I have been testing 7.1
Some friends of mine are looking at the new "DroboPro", which makes a
lot of disk space available via iSCSI (in addition to firewire 800),
and they were wondering how well iSCSI works with FreeBSD. I haven't
paid attention to iSCSI support. Is there anyone using it heavily
for disk-storage under
At 9:13 PM -0400 7/1/06, Francisco Reyes wrote:
John Hay writes:
I only started to see the lockd problems when upgrading
the server side to FreeBSD 6.x and later. I had various
FreeBSD clients, between 4.x and 7-current and the lockd
problem only showed up when upgrading the server from
5.x to
It happens that I noticed two odd networking problems recently.
One of them is easily reproducible, and I have it tracked down
to one innocuous-looking line in my /etc/pf.conf. The other
is a problem in a chat server that I run, with a few hundred
people on it, and is much more of a hassle to rep
At 9:07 PM -0400 7/27/06, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
But if I restart pf after adding these lines to pf.conf:
# Allow all outgoing tcp and udp connections and keep state
pass out quick proto { tcp, udp } all keep state
then I have the problem where the second 'lpq' from a r
At 9:18 PM -0400 7/27/06, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 9:07 PM -0400 7/27/06, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
But if I restart pf after adding these lines to pf.conf:
# Allow all outgoing tcp and udp connections and keep state
pass out quick proto { tcp, udp } all keep state
then I have
At 9:30 PM +0200 7/28/06, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 28.07.2006 um 03:57 schrieb Garance A Drosihn:
It occurred to me that it might be more informative to
see the transaction from the *freebsd* side of things,
since that's the machine running pf! So, here is a
similar set of two lpq'
At 7:59 PM +0300 8/15/06, Android Andrew [:] wrote:
Yes, nothing changed.
Problem could be in anything: memory, raid controller,
network adapter, power supply, bios and so on. But to
test it all empirically will take too much time. The
most annoying thing in this situation is absence of
any syst
At 8:42 AM -0700 10/11/06, Jason Stone wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Though I admit RELENG_4 is getting dusty, it is not rusty. I believe it
is still used in many places because of its stability and performance.
[...]
Is it envisageable to extend the RELENG_4's and RELEN
At 12:42 AM +0200 10/12/06, Dan Lukes wrote:
As I'm not commiter, I'm allowed to submit PR and speak.
I'm trying both. This letter is "speak" part.
Understood.
But this has been announced for awhile. If the people who actually
depend on 4.x can find the resources to support it, I am
At 4:31 PM +0200 10/13/06, Buki wrote:
Hi,
I searched the archives and web a little but found many different
opinions on stability/usability of using make -j# with buildworld
(and buildkernel).
So I am asking if it is a good idea to use make -j on production
boxes.
It depends on the target.
At 1:02 AM -0400 11/7/04, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I hate to report an email, but after being laughed at by both
Linux and Windows users, I'm kinda concerned at the lack of
response to my originals ... is this truly the desired behaviour?
And, if so ... can someone put some sort of warning/notice ab
At 2:08 PM +0900 11/23/04, Rob wrote:
Hi,
I have tested following with FreeBSD 5.3-Stable.
On several different PCs I have used
make -j$n buildworld
with $n ranging from 1 to 9.
Although people suggest "-j4" as optimal in general
case, I have come to a very different conclusion...
So, I finally
At 7:36 PM +0100 12/6/04, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
El Lunes, 6 de Diciembre de 2004 08:39, Rob escribió:
Hi,
For 5.3 in /usr/share/examples/cvsup, there's:
stable-supfile : for FreeBSD-stable
standard-supfile : for FreeBSD-current
I find this naming rather confusing. Why "stable" refers t
At 1:01 AM -0600 12/7/04, Tim Welch wrote:
I'm getting NID not found/DMA errors on 5-STABLE with a Seagate 200gb
sata drive:
ad2: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA status=51
error=10 LBA=268435455
This appears to be a result of 48-bit addressing. Any time a write is
attempted to the sector above, I get mul
At 9:49 PM +0100 12/9/04, Søren Schmidt wrote:
I'm going to work on it soon thats for sure, however I have lots
on the burner currently so its no rush. However all kinds of
(S)ATA/ATAPI gear is always most welcome here in the lab, the
levels of support I can provide is directly proportional to the
At 4:51 PM + 1/23/05, Robert Watson wrote:
The ps list is a bit boring, but the primary interesting thing is
that it looks like the close was going on in one thread just about
when the sio swi was scheduled to run also:
[...]
This in turn suggests that something has called ttyrel/tty_close
At 7:31 PM -0800 2/21/05, Doug White wrote:
cvsup12 is damaged. If you've checked out against it your
checkout is corrupted and you'll need to blow away your src
dir and checkouts.cvs file to recover. The administrator
has been notified.
Is there some way we could inform/re-direct the people who a
At 3:19 PM -0800 2/27/05, Nate Lawson wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Have you tried sos@ new ATAng mk III patches ? As far as I know
he plans to commit those shortly.
One minor point: Søren is on vacation right now. I *think* he will
be getting back around March 5th (assuming I understand what h
re@ note: This might be important for 5.4-release
At 5:59 PM -0800 2/27/05, Nate Lawson wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
One minor point: Søren is on vacation right now. I *think* he
will be getting back around March 5th
Augh. Not the most convenient circumstances. I'm happy to work
At 8:50 AM +1000 3/9/05, Simon Litchfield wrote:
Hi folks
Anyone have any ideas on the Promise PDC20319 (Fasttrak S150 TX4)?
We intend to run 5.3 release on this machine.
Hmm.
Looking at sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c, it looks like that chipset
is known by 5.3-release. I know Søren has said that he ha
At 3:40 PM -0500 4/7/05, Frank Knobbe wrote:
Greetings,
I just noticed that the /etc/passwd files contains the shell
"/usr/sbin/nologin" by default on many users. Shouldn't that be
"/sbin/nologin" instead?
It was moved from /sbin/nologin to /usr/sbin/nologin, for reasons
that were tied to changing
At 1:08 PM +0200 5/28/07, Andreas Klemm wrote:
Hi,
discovered that the maillog file on my freebsd Desktop
grows and grows (now at 50MB).
According to the newsyslog.conf file it should be trimmed
every night at midnight.
/var/log/maillog640 7 *@T00 JC
Is it a
At 12:03 AM -0400 4/12/06, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:43:32PM +, David E. Cross wrote:
I saw under http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.1R/todo.html that swap
performance under 6.x is slower then 4.X, and this is listed as "not
done".
> I noticed that 6.1 seemed to b
At 11:44 AM -0600 4/12/06, Scott Long wrote:
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 12:03 AM -0400 4/12/06, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I didn't think this was a 6.1 regression compared to 6.0,
but 6.x compared to 4.x. It would be good to try and
quantify any performance differences here - so far it
At 1:06 PM +0200 7/16/05, Øystein Holmen wrote:
I was looking for a place to download 6.0-BETA1-powerpc-bootonly.iso
to test om my PowerMac G4. But I cannot find it on any of
the ftp-sites og mirrors. Where can I download it?
It may have been taken down. There were a few problems with the
iso'
At 8:50 AM -0400 7/21/05, MikeM wrote:
On 7/21/2005 at 8:29 PM Daniel O'Connor wrote:
|
| I think the best way to rectify this is to test RC candidates
| on YOUR hardware.. This finds the bugs you need fixed at a
| time when people are very receptive to fixing them.
|
| It's not realistic for the
At 1:32 PM -0700 8/4/05, Mike Eubanks wrote:
I have finished migrating my system from 5.1-RELEASE to 5.4-STABLE.
The system no longer powers down using either the `shutdown -p now'
or `acpiconf -s 5' commands. Instead it always restarts.
This won't help much, but I have a system running 5.4-ST
At 8:43 PM -0700 8/4/05, Mike Eubanks wrote:
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 19:14 -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
Hmm. The more I think about this, the more I think I tripped
across something similar once. I think it was something like
I turned on 'APM' somewhere, or I added it to
At 12:33 PM + 10/30/00, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> I have found that lpr does not pass the -C parameters to
>lpd unless burst header pages are being printed. Unfortunately
>apsfilter (ab)uses the -C parameters for printer mode control.
>The patch below moves pass through of the -C param
At 3:38 PM -0500 10/30/00, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>In fact, I'm inclined to say both the 'C' and 'P' lines should
>be moved out of that conditional block. The only thing that
>really triggers a header sheet is the 'L' line, and there are
>other
At 7:37 PM +0100 11/13/00, Marko Cuk wrote:
>What is with the bridging code ?? It won't work from 4.0 !!
>I wrote about that problem many times.
Where did you write it to? I do not see any problem-reports
(ie, as generated via send-pr) from you. You may have
described them in previous messages
At 3:29 PM -0700 4/20/01, David Greenman wrote:
>someone wrote:
> > And even in "normal" situations, it's quite hard to actually
> > get all the bit's from ftp.freesoftware.com ...
>
>You are right that the performance has sucked generally
>for awhile, however. Lightning has been bandwidth l
At 9:52 PM -0700 7/12/01, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>And, as I'm sure others have pointed out by now, it's even easier
>to do this with the -a flag. :)
>
>Of course, since pkg_delete also supports globbing now, one assumes
>'pkg_delete *' from *any* directory would also work.
watch out there. you wo
This will probably seem like a dumb thing to report, but I'll mention
it in case someone who knows about yp/NIS would want to comment on it.
My .bashrc file is (pretty much) the same on the many different platforms
that I work on, and as a matter of trouble-shooting on SOME of those
platforms I d
At 12:38 PM -0400 9/15/01, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>Should a parallel build always work ? I was just trying to stress
>a new series of MB we are evaluating and to my suprise, -j4 works,
>but not -j8
Well, in a philosophical sense, yes it "should" always work. Bugs
creep into the process from time-to-
At 11:11 AM -0700 10/18/01, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Schmalzbauer, Harald wrote:
>
> > see www.openafs.org. I read that somebody has successfully ported
> > the server. I haven't tried it yet but I hope it's working. AFS
> > is THE solution for many problems.
>
>/usr/ports/net/
At 10:57 AM -0500 10/18/01, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
> > > Must one supply any other arguments to newfs in order to enable
> > > dirpref? A quick look at man newfs didn't make any mention of
> > > dirpref.
> >
> > No, it's on by default in kernels that include the new code.
>
>Is there a
This is something odd I noticed when I did a buildworld. It may be due
to something I did, but I thought I'd mention it in case other people
start noticing the same thing. My system is working fine, so this is
not a crisis for me. Just an oddity that I thought I'd mention.
[and apologies if th
At 9:31 PM -0700 11/19/01, Chad R. Larson wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 07:49:49PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>> The comments for the commit include "which adds the ability to
>> compile modules -g as well" (among other things). The original
>> commit to
At 11:47 AM +1030 12/23/01, Greg Lehey wrote:
>Somehow I'm nervous this close to a release. I suspect that this is
>one area which gets almost no testing in -CURRENT. Can you summarize
>(again?) what they do?
The change is to what partition-sizes are chosen if a person does
let 'disklabel' auto
At 6:36 PM +0100 2/1/02, Erik Trulsson wrote:
>Consider that the actual code in the various rc* start scripts is
>in most cases of the form:
>
>if foo_enable==yes
> do stuff
>else
> do nothing
The RC scripts are starting up in a "known" environment (loosely
speaking). Enough is known about t
At 6:36 PM +0100 2/1/02, Erik Trulsson wrote:
>Consider that the actual code in the various rc* start scripts is
>in most cases of the form:
>
>if foo_enable==yes
> do stuff
>else
> do nothing
Let me approach this from a different angle. Several people have
tried to argue this by proposing v
Oh. Damn.
Someone *added* freebsd-current to this thread without removing
freebsd-stable. Several people have requested that we stop
discussing this on freebsd-stable, and I *thought* I was only
sending my recent messages to the one mailing list.
I do not particularly care which mailing list t
At 11:38 AM +0300 2/19/02, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote:
>Hi.
>
>My vmware2 use netgraph bridge to access the network. Under 4.4 all
>work fine. But after upgrade to 4.5 I got some trouble. I can't see
>my FBSD box under vmware, but all other boxes in network work fine.
>I can't ping from FBSD box to v
At 11:07 PM -0500 4/30/02, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>Just a quick note for those of you using accept filters with
>a 4.4+ kernel using the syncache: Your accept filters are
>broken, and easily DoSable.
>
>The fix (attached) has now been committed to both 5.0 and 4.5,
>so I recommend doing one of tw
At 3:08 PM +1000 7/1/02, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > # xargs ls -d < /tmp/p
>> xargs: ls: Argument list too long
>
>You mean the warning "Argument list too long" ?
>It's coming from your shell.
Well, that's true, but it's coming from the shell because xargs
built a command that was too long...
At 10:47 AM -0700 9/18/03, roger n. tospott wrote:
/usr/src/usr.sbin/lpr/common_source/lp.local.h currently has
#define DEFMX 1000
Given the size of files nowadays, shouldn't this be a
little larger?
This was recently changed to 0 in current, but not in stable.
(zero meaning "n
At 10:49 PM -0400 9/6/04, Sahil Tandon wrote:
kstewart wrote:
There is a bug in ruby that shows up as a bus error. Follow the
topic on [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are several ways to alter the INDEX[-5]
so that it occurs less frequently.
Occurs less frequently? That's not what I'm looking for. Is the
Note: I'm sending this to just the -current list, since it's pretty
clear that this change won't be ready for -stable anytime this year...
(hopefully Alfred is in -current?)
At 3:02 PM -0800 12/9/99, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> > On Tue, 07-Dec-1999 at
At 9:40 PM -0400 7/16/00, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
>Is it possible to ignore the "reboot in single mode" part?
>
>It is not possible to get this system into single mode, because
>it has to be up, always.
>it can have a maximum downtime of maybe 45 seconds, which is
>too long to go into single mode an
At 6:19 PM -0700 9/16/00, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Peter Radcliffe wrote:
>
> > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably said:
> > > On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Peter Radcliffe wrote:
> > > > Can we _please_ get these two patches into at least -stable
> > > > before or after this rele
56 matches
Mail list logo
