Node conflicts in SVN

2012-11-19 Thread Frank Seltzer
I run a nightly ports tree update and I have been getting the following errors the last couple of days. I haven't seen this asked before so is this just me or is anyone else seeing this? Have I fat-fingered something? Updating '/usr/ports': Skipped '/usr/ports/astro' -- Node remains in confl

Re: Node conflicts in SVN

2012-11-19 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Frank Seltzer wrote: I run a nightly ports tree update and I have been getting the following errors the last couple of days. I haven't seen this asked before so is this just me or is anyone else seeing this? H

Re: Node conflicts in SVN

2012-11-19 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Frank Seltzer wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Frank Seltzer wrote: I run a nightly ports tree update and I have been getting the following errors the last

Re: Node conflicts in SVN

2012-11-19 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Eitan Adler wrote: It's now up to 24. Updating '/usr/ports': Skipped '/usr/ports/mail' -- Node remains in conflict Skipped '/usr/ports/net' -- Node remains in conflict Skipped '/usr/ports/multimedia' -- Node remains in conflict Skipped '/usr/ports/dns' -- Node remains in

Re: Node conflicts in SVN

2012-11-21 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: Can you run `svn status`? What does it show ? -- wbr, tiger 'svn status > stat' creates a 5.5 meg file mostly consisting of lines like: D Mk/bsd.apache.mk D Mk/bsd.autotools.mk D Mk/bsd.cmake.mk D Mk/bsd.commands.mk D

expr error in 9-STABLE

2013-09-12 Thread Frank Seltzer
Posting because I haven't seen this yet. I have been getting this error on 2 boxes for the last 2 days. Both boxes: root@Shop:/usr/src # svn info /usr/src/ Path: . Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src URL: svn://kryten.nina.org/src/stable/9 Relative URL: ^/stable/9 Repository Root: svn://kryten.nin

Re: expr error in 9-STABLE

2013-09-14 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 01:33:05 -0400 (EDT) Frank Seltzer wrote: Posting because I haven't seen this yet. I have been getting this error on 2 boxes for the last 2 days. This has been answered before: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail

Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Frank Seltzer
I didn't get any hits from a mailing list search and there is no mail or sendmail list so I am sending it here because stable is what I'm running. Because of a recent alert I updated both of my FreeBSD computers (both running 10.1-STABLE and built from /etc/src) to r284296 and am having a prob

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015, Gregory Shapiro wrote: The new OpenSSL eliminated small DHParam support. That leaves two possibilities: 1. The remote side you are talking to is using a small value. The best thing to do would be to eliminate the DH ciphers from your settings. See the docs for the Cip

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Frank Seltzer
I updated source and rebuilt world and kernel with no change in sendmail's behavior. This is the revision I have now: root@Ace:/etc/mail/certs # svnlite info /usr/src/ Path: /usr/src Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src URL: svn://ace/src/stable/10 Relative URL: ^/stable/10 Repository Root: svn://a

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-14 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015, Gregory Shapiro wrote: After the update I got your email and followed your instructions, except for moving dh.param because it didn't exist, and sendmail is happy now. Happy to hear sendmail is happy. I checked and there is still no mention of this in /usr/src/UPDATING s

Re: Sendmail problem after upgrade to r284296

2015-06-15 Thread Frank Seltzer
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015, Gregory Shapiro wrote: I created it per your instructions. See above about it not existing previously. Oh, sorry for the confusion. Seems an emergency patch is in order to change the default. Would you be willing to test this patch (apply, build, install, remove dh.pa