Re: geli problems after installkernel & installworld

"Christopher J. Ruwe" wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:30:56 +0100 > Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:00:19PM +0100, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote: > > > I use a mostly geli encrypted hd on my Thinkpad R500, > > > with /compat, /usr, /tmp and /var all on the encrypted geli

Re: Setting coredumpsize on a running process?

Ivan Voras wrote: > On 18 October 2011 16:43, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 04:32:11PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> I have PHP executing as fastcgi via the mod_fcgid module in Apache. I > >> suspect there is a bug in PHP or one of its extensions which causes it > >> to cras

Re: sysutils/pftop on 9.x+

Greg Rivers wrote: > sysutils/pftop was marked broken on 9.x and above last March[1]. Are > there any plans to fix it soon? It's a really handy utility. > > [1] > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/pftop/Makefile?rev=1.17 Please have a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/q

Re: FreeBSD root on a geli-encrypted ZFS pool

"xenophon\\+freebsd" wrote: > I have posted revised instructions for installing FreeBSD to an > encrypted ZFS pool on my blog: > > https://web.irtnog.org/~xenophon/blog/revised-freebsd-root-zfs-geli > > The entire procedure is documented in a way suitable for scripting. I > would be very inter

Re: FreeBSD root on a geli-encrypted ZFS pool

"xenophon\\+freebsd" wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Fabian Keil [mailto:freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 11:49 AM > > It's not clear to me why you enable geli integrity verification. > > >

Re: FreeBSD root on a geli-encrypted ZFS pool

"Matthew X. Economou" wrote: > Fabian Keil writes: > > Anyway, it's a test without file system so the ZFS overhead isn't > > measured. I wasn't entirely clear about it, but my assumption was > > that the ZFS overhead might be big enough to mak

Re: kern/157863: [geli] kbdmux prevents geli passwords from being entered properly on boot

Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote: > Just to let everyone know that this is still an issue. > > I am trying to install FreeBSD 9.0 amd64 on a Lenovo X121e and I > can't get it to accept the geli passphrase during boot. I've confirmed > using kern.geom.eli.visible_passphrase=1 that the passphrase is >

Re: geli decrypt only one partition

joerg_surmann wrote: > i have two partitions: ada0p3.eli and ada1p3.eli > on bootprocess i must type a passphrase for ada0p3 and have ada0p3.eli. > next i type the passphrase for ada1p3 and i become: wrong key > when the bootprocess is finish and i login and type geli attach -k > /path to keyf

Re: geli decrypt only one partition

joerg_surmann wrote: > Sorry, i no had enough time for this geli problem. > I work with a testsystem. > When start booting in verbose mode the system found the keypaths. > > Preloaded ada0p4:geli_keyfile0 "/root/keys/ada0p4.key" at 0xc14bf540. > Preloaded ada1p4:geli_keyfile1 "/root/keys/ada1p4.

Re: GELI encrypted ZFS zpool

Steve Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an older storage box that I've upgraded to -stable. It currently > uses 7 SCSI disks mashed together with gstripe. > > I've recently replaced this box with a new one running a ZFS setup. I'm > now wanting to turn the old one into a storage device

Re: constant zfs data corruption

JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 20 October 2008 11:22:08 you wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 08:37:40AM -0200, JoaoBR wrote: > > > On Friday 17 October 2008 15:39:59 Chuck Swiger wrote: > > > > On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:30 AM, JoaoBR wrote: > > > > > constantly I find data corruption

Re: constant zfs data corruption

Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 03:07:30PM -0200, JoaoBR wrote: > > On Monday 20 October 2008 11:22:08 you wrote: > > > Also, do you not think it's a little odd that the only data > > > corruption occurring for you are related to RRDtool? > > > > this yes I t

Re: non-root user can not create zfs filesystem?

Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes,that's is what I want to say. > > In other word is the command "zfs allow" and "zfs unallow" > > I think it is not "Support chflags(2)" which is described in at the > > bottom of http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS > > Sorry, my unclear use of english! I did

Re: ATA_CAM + ZFS gives short 1-2 seconds system freeze on disk load

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:33:29PM +0100, Guido Falsi wrote: > > I'm seeing this problem on my machine at work. It's an HP DC 7800, > > mounts an ich9 chipset(not ahci capable). I'm attaching the dmesg. > > > > I noticed this in the past, but it got evident(and very ann

Re: possible zfs bug? lost all pools

JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > man page thar zfs can not be a dump device, not sure if I understand it > as meant but I can dump to zfs very well and fast as long as > recordsize=128 I assume you tried dump(8), while the sentence in the man page is about using a ZFS volume as dumpon(8) targe

Re: geom using 100% cpu with failed da5. How to calm it down without cam passdev?

Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > I've a failed disk at a remote server, which shouldn't be a problem > actually. Welcome to geom ... > Just for info, here's the last shout: > kernel: (da5:mps0:0:5:0): SYNCHRONIZE CACHE(10). CDB: 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 0 length 0 SMID 256 command timeout cm 0x

Re: how to destroy zfs parent filesystem without destroying children - corrupted file causing kernel panick

Greg Bonett wrote: > Many months ago, I believe some *very bad hardware* caused corruption of a > file on one of my zfs file systems. I've isolated the corrupted file and > can reliably induce a kernel panic with "touch bad.file", "rm bad.file", or > "ls -l" in the bad.file's directory (ls in ba

Re: how to destroy zfs parent filesystem without destroying children - corrupted file causing kernel panick

Greg Bonett wrote: > > My next plan would be reporting the problem with sufficient > > information so the bug can be fixed. > > > > Destroying the dataset or the whole pool seems like papering over the > > real issue to me and you could still do it if the PR gets ignored for > > too long or a dev

Re: patch which implements ZFS LZ4 compression

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 02:52:57PM -0800, Xin Li wrote: > > On 02/08/13 14:29, Dan Langille wrote: > > > Here is a patch against FreeBSD 9.1 STABLE which implements ZFS LZ4 > > > compression. > > > > > > https://plus.google.com/106386350930626759085/posts/PLbkNfndPiM > >

Re: patch which implements ZFS LZ4 compression

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 03:19:18PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote: > > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > > If you want a PR for it, I'll file one, but all it's going to contain is > > > the contents of this Email. > > > > My imp

Re: New FreeBSD snapshots available: stable/10 (20150625 r284813)

Glen Barber wrote: > [-stable@ in CC since these are the first 10.2-PRERELEASE builds > available since the code slush went into effect, which marks the start > of the release cycle.] > > New FreeBSD development branch installation ISOs and virtual machine > disk images have been uploaded to the

Re: New FreeBSD snapshots available: stable/10 (20150625 r284813)

Chris Ross wrote: > Yeah, this is the same panic you, I, and others have been seeing on > sparc64's with bge's, or at least v240's (and one other IIRC) for many > many months. Thanks for grabbing a core! Does it make a difference if you boot with hw.bge.allow_asf=0? According to the man page

Re: New FreeBSD snapshots available: stable/10 (20150625 r284813)

Kurt Lidl wrote: > > [-stable@ in CC since these are the first 10.2-PRERELEASE builds > > available since the code slush went into effect, which marks the start > > of the release cycle.] > > > > New FreeBSD development branch installation ISOs and virtual machine > > disk images have been upload

Re: 10.2-RELEASE-p2 lost ability to bootstrap pkg with signature_type="pubkey"

Marko Cupać wrote: > I just found out that 10.2-RELEASE-p2 lost ability to bootstrap pkg > with signature_type="pubkey". > > Quick search returns: > https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues/1309 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202622 > > I guess it is not hard to switch repo to

Re: crash in acd_geom_detach() whilst reading vcd

Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was trying to play a VCD (using mplayer) on my 6-STABLE system and > it runs for a while and then crashes. This is reproducable with the > same traceback. > > kgdb reports: > acd0: FAILURE - device detached > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kerne

Re: Panic in radeon_get_vblank_counter()

Robert Noland wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 23:33 -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Robert Noland wrote: > > If I start rebooting before it is printed, the system locks up. Of > > course, this is only after rebooting several times. > > > > Here is a successful start and

Re: ZFS MFC heads up

Pertti Kosunen wrote: > Kip Macy wrote: > > I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both > > world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will > > continue to work without upgrade. > > Mounting local file systems:. > internal error: out of memory > internal

Re: Periodic jobs triggering panics in 10.1 and 10.2

Michelle Sullivan wrote: > ZFS has it's place, it is very good at some things, it brings features > that people need. > ZFS does not work (is not stable) on i386 without recompiling the > kernel, but it is presented as an installation option. > ZFS is compiled in by default in i386 kernels withou

Re: WLANDEV of vaps

Matthias Meyser wrote: > ist there a way to get the correspondig wlandev of an existing wlan? > > e.g. > > I have one urtwn0 an one run0 an one configured wlan0. > > How do i know where wlan0 belongs to? Try: sysctl net.wlan.0.%parent Fabian pgp5linSIydgJ.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital s

Poor ZFS ARC metadata hit/miss stats after recent ZFS updates

After rebasing some of my systems from r305866 to r307312 (plus local patches) I noticed that most of the ARC accesses are counted as misses now. Example: [fk@elektrobier2 ~]$ uptime 2:03PM up 1 day, 18:36, 7 users, load averages: 0.29, 0.36, 0.30 [fk@elektrobier2 ~]$ zfs-stats -E

Re: Swapping from a zvol results in a deadman panic

"Matthew X. Economou" wrote: > My FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p16 server crashes in the middle of a Poudriere > bulk run (see below). This crash happens even if I lower > vfs.zfs.arc_max or tweak vm.v_free_min/target/reserved/severe. I'm > looking for configuration advice in case I missed something ob

Re: moutnroot failing on zpools in Azure after upgrade from 10 to 11 due to lack of waiting for da0

Pete French wrote: > I have a number of machines in Azure, all booting from ZFS and, until > the weekend, running 10.3 perfectly happily. > > I started upgrading these to 11. The first went fine, the second would > not boot. Looking at the boot diagnistics it is having problems finding > the roo

Re: zpool imported twice with different names (was Re: Fwd: ZFS)

Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > On 05/15/2017 08:09 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > While trying to rename a zpool from zroot to vega, > > I ended up in this strange situation: > > nik@vega:~ % zfs list -t all > > NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT > > vega

Re: a strange and terrible saga of the cursed iSCSI ZFS SAN

"Eugene M. Zheganin" wrote: > On 05.08.2017 22:08, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > > > > pool: userdata > > state: ONLINE > > status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data > > corruption. Applications may be affected. > > action: Restore the file in question if po

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > > > There was a "request" for Tor related problem reports a while ago, > > I couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here. > > I'm very

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > > After manually triggering a test panic through debug.kdb.enter I > > could enter ddb and everything seemed to be working. > > > > However today I got another hang and couldn&#x

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > > I am using ssh 2, but the only reaction I get is a new line. > > > > |FreeBSD/i386 (tor.fabiankeil.de) (ttyd0) > > | > > |login: ~B > > | > > It sounds like

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the last episode (Jul 02), Robert Watson said: > > On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > > >The ssh man page offers: > > > > > >|~B Send a BREAK to the remote system (only useful for SSH > > >|

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It sounds like your serial console server may not know how to map > > SSH break signals into remote serial break signals. Try > > ALT_BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER. Here's the desc

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It sounds like your serial console server may not know how to map > > > SSH break signals into remote ser

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > > I just got: > > > > Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal: > > Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 1st 0xc3795000 kqueue (kqueue) @ > > /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_even

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > > > > I just got: > > > > > > Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal: > > > Jun 28 23:01:19 t

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To you have pf running? If so can you turn it off for a bit a see if > you still crash. On my box I was getting all sorts of witness kbd > backtraces on pf and since turning pf off (maybe a week ago), haven't > crashed yet. Going to let it keep running

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > To you have pf running? If so can you turn it off for a bit a see if > > you still crash. On my box I was getting all sorts of witness kbd > > backtraces on pf and si

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Peter Thoenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > To you have pf running? If so can you turn it off for a bit a see > > > if you still crash. On my box I

Re: 16M RAM enough for FreeBSD 6.1?

Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an old laptop, a Compaq Armada 1580DMT, with 16M RAM, 2GB hd, > floppy and CD-rom. It doesn't have built in networking, neither wired > nor wireless. It does have PC card slots. It has had FreeBSD 4.9-release > installed a long time, and was re

Re: 16M RAM enough for FreeBSD 6.1?

Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:13:12 +0200 > Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For information: I'm still trying to find a sodimm card for this > machine, as everything would be easier if it had more memory. > W

Re: Is there any good reason for get*by*_r()?

Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > get*by*_r() are deprecated on most platforms and there use > is highly non-portable, lots of different API's. > > Why are we adding compatability for deprecated functions? I was wondering the same thing, especially because it causes a l

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling) [Probably not a FreeBSD problem]

Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > > > There was a "request" for Tor related problem reports a while ago, I > > couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here. > > I'm very

Re: Can't build threaded perl 5.8 on 6.2-RELEASE and 7-CURRENT

LI Xin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems that threaded perl is broken on 6.2-RELEASE and 7-CURRENT. I > have tried some option combinations with no luck, if WITH_THREADED=yes > is specified then the build would fail with a coredump. > Any hints? I ran into the same miniperl core dumps a few

Re: Can't build threaded perl 5.8 on 6.2-RELEASE and 7-CURRENT

LI Xin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fabian Keil wrote: > > LI Xin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> It seems that threaded perl is broken on 6.2-RELEASE and 7-CURRENT. I > >> have tried some option combinations with no luck, if WITH_THREADED=ye

Re: 6.2-RELEASE panic when blanking CD-RW media

"Petr Holub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've encountered a deterministic kernel panic when > blanking one specific CD-RW media using cdrecord. > The kernel panic details follow and dmesg is at the end of this > email. Though I understand there's something wrong with the media, > I think it shou

Re: release cycle

Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 29/05/07, Mark Linimon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 09:17:57PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > > > Agreed. 6.3-RELEASE would nominally be due around July but the lack > > > of any schedule on http://www.freebsd.org/releng/ suggests that

Re: device atapicam - causes huge slowdown

Adam Retter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FreeBSD funkalicious.home.dom 6.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE #8: > Thu Feb 23 23:24:57 GMT 2006 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/funkalicious i386 > > I have a fairly straight-forward kernel config (see below) I think, yet > if I enable "de

Re: wpa_supplicant with NDIS-wrapped wireless card and WPA-PSK reboots 6.1-pre

Carlos Amengual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My system is a 6.1-PRERELEASE as of yesterday afternoon, but the same > happened with a RELENG_6 as of a month ago. > > I set up a D-Link AirPlus DWL-520+ wireless PCI adapter in an old > server, and NDISwrapped it (got an AIRPLUS_SYS.ko). > > When

Re: 6.0-REL problems with ISA ed0, FFS corruption and ancient hardware

"Matt Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I recently upgraded a 4.11-REL machine to 6.0-REL and have run into > some snags. While the installation from CD went fine, after > configuring and enabling my ed0 NIC, bad things start to happen. > > FWIW, this machine is an ancient (hardware circa 1

Re: Prism wi support in 6.x - or alternative card

Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I Hvae an IBM Thinkpad X30 with a miniPCI wireless card: > > wi0: mem 0xf800-0xf8000fff irq 11 at device > 2.0 on pci1 wi0: using RF:PRISM2.5 MAC:ISL3874A(Mini-PCI) > wi0: Intersil Firmware: Primary (1.1.0), Station (1.4.9) > wi0: Ethernet address:

Re: truss problems

Jonas Wolz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > while trying to get the gnash CVS version to work I noticed that on > my system (FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE) truss obviously has problems tracing > firefox: truss prints somewhat "random" error messages and traces > only some of the system calls firefox makes (open

Re: How can I install a driver?

Yousef Raffah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm having an issue as I'm a newbie in installing/configuring the > marvell driver for FreeBSD. > > A quick search in the mailing lists shows: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2601224+2604070 > +/usr/local/www/db/text/2006/freebsd-questions/

Re: devfs.conf and pass0

JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > seems on recent releng_6 (RC1) the permissions set to pass0 > within /etc/devfs.conf are not applied anymore and need to be set > manual in order getting acd0 available to users Works for me on FreeBSD 6.1-RC #1: Sun Apr 9 20:07:42 CEST 2006. Did you by any

Re: devfs.conf and pass0

JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 13 April 2006 09:28, Fabian Keil wrote: > > JoaoBR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > seems on recent releng_6 (RC1) the permissions set to pass0 > > > within /etc/devfs.conf are not applied anymore and need

Configuring FreeBSD 4.9 on a new system (was: FreeBSD Newbie...)

"John Dworske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Help me...yeah...OK...so here it goes...I am brand new to >FreeBSD...installed OS onto a box from >a set of floppies I got off the net... > >Last login: Wed May 3 14:37:21 2006 from 10.10.20.20 >Copyright (c) 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988,

Loading geom_eli in loader.conf disables psm0

To encrypt my home slice with geli I followed "17.16.2 Disk Encryption with geli": As I prefer to have my home directory available after boot, I additionally added: geli_devices="ad0s1" geli_ad0s1_flags="-k

Re: GELI issues ? (Re: Increase in panics under 6.1)

Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 23 May 2006 22:01:16 -0400 > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So what is the traceback? > > > > See the developers handbook for more information. > > doh! yes, i'll get onto this as soon as I can. > > Interestingly enough , i

Re: kmem leak in tmpmfs?

"Arno J. Klaassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I get a very easy to reproduce panic on 6.1-STABLE : > > /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate panics with > > panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 335544320 total > allocated > This box has nothing particular, apart from maybe a

Re: kmem leak in tmpmfs?

Iasen Kostov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 16:54 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:01:30PM +0200, Arno J. Klaassen wrote: > > > I get a very easy to reproduce panic on 6.1-STABLE : > > > > > > /etc/periodic/weekly/310.locate panics with > > > > > >

Re: GELI issues ? (Re: Increase in panics under 6.1)

Stanislaw Halik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > >> Interestingly enough , i had some nasty issues todays on same > >> laptop. I had 2 x 6 GB GELI vnodes, running mtree -K md5digest to > >> compare contents. Disk IO was

FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

There was a "request" for Tor related problem reports a while ago, I couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here. Last week I installed: FreeBSD tor.fabiankeil.de 6.1-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p2 #0: Fri Jun 23 20:06:57 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BI

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > > > There was a "request" for Tor related problem reports a while ago, > > I couldn't find the message again, but I believe it was posted here. > > I'm very

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Are there any warnings on the console from WITNESS or other > debugging options? I just got: Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: lock order reversal: Jun 28 23:01:19 tor kernel: 1st 0xc3795000 kqueue (kqueue) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:1053 Jun 28 23:0

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > > > Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> - Are there any warnings on the console from WITNESS or other > >> debugging options? > > > >

Re: FreeBSD 6.1 Tor issues (Once More, with Feeling)

Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Fabian Keil wrote: > > > I wish I could. The machine died before I read your message. > > > > I was logged in on the serial console running tail > > -f /var/log/messages. Last messages were

Fw: 5.4-STABLE panic: kernel trap 12 with interrupts diabled

Hi list, forwarding to freebsd-stable (probably the right place anyway), since I got no further responses on freebsd-questions. Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/5/2005 19:43, Fabian Keil wrote: > >the day before yesterday I experienced my first > >panic on

ndisgen intended to be the only way to generate ndis?

Hi all, as you probably have noticed, the amount of mails about problems with compiling ndis has increased in the last four weeks. The "old" way to compile ndis was to go to /usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis/, use ndiscvt to create a header file containing the windows driver and to make;make install.

Re: ndisgen intended to be the only way to generate ndis?

"Daniel O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:49, Fabian Keil wrote: > > AFAIK, nobody has announced that the "old" way is death, > > therefore I would like to know if the breakage is intentional > > and if it is, if the

Missing wep_wlan at 5.4 (was: Atheros (ath0) no RX traffic)

Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > Richard Arends wrote: > >> Today I upgraded my laptop from 5-STABLE to 6-STABLE. After the > >> upgrade, my wireless is not working anymore. > > > > > > You are doing better than me. I try this: > > ifconfig ath0 wepk

FreeBSD 6.0 panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: 172728320 total allocated

I triggered a few reproducible panics on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE. I created a ramdisk with: /sbin/mdconfig -a -t malloc -s 256M -u 10 /sbin/newfs -U /dev/md10 /sbin/mount /dev/md10 /mnt/ramdisk The system has "avail memory = 515932160 (492 MB)" and 1GB swap space. While copy

Re: FreeBSD 6.0 panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: 172728320 total allocated

Gleb Smirnoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:25:30PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote: > F> I triggered a few reproducible panics on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE. > F> > F> I created a ramdisk with: > F> > F> /sbin/mdconfig -a -t malloc -s

Re: FreeBSD 6.0 panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: 172728320 total allocated [solved]

Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:25:30PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote: > > F> I triggered a few reproducible panics on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE. > > F> > > F> I created a ramdisk with: > > F>

Re: FreeBSD 6.0 panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: 172728320 total allocated [solved]

Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 05:32:34PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote: > > > I guess you're right. I can fill a 256MB swap-backed disk without > > panic and without swapping. > > FYI, this is documented in the manpage. I

Re: Slightly OT, getting errors from members on this list

"Morten A. Middelthon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just got this message after posting to freebsd-stable@freebsd.org: > > Subject: Blogger post failed > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 05:32:36 -0800 (PST) > > Blogger does not accept multipart/signed f

Re: NFS UDP mounts on RELENG_6?

Oliver Brandmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm experiencing problems when trying to mount NFS filesystems from a > RELENG_6 server (FreeBSD hudson 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE >#0: Wed Dec 14 16:59:55 CET 2005 >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NFS-32-FBSD6 i386) > to eit

Re: NFS UDP mounts on RELENG_6?

Oliver Brandmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 04:30:31PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote: > > Oliver Brandmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm experiencing problems when trying to mount NFS filesystems > > >

wi0 unreliable on FreeBSD 6.0

Since the update from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago I have trouble with the wireless network. This card worked fine with FreeBSD 5.4: wi0: at port 0x4000-0x403f irq 11 function 0 config 1 on pccard0 wi0: using RF:PRISM2.5 MAC:ISL3873 wi0: Intersil Firmware: Primary (1.0.4), Station (1.2.

Re: wi0 unreliable on FreeBSD 6.0

"Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:32:08 +0100 > > From: Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Since the update from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago I have > > trouble with the wireless network. &

ndis0 does not associate since update to RELENG_6

I fail to get the following device working since my update from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x028000 card=0x27128086 chip=0x42208086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network Connection' class= network

Re: ndis0 does not associate since update to RELENG_6

Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I fail to get the following device working since my update > from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x028000 card=0x27128086 chip=0x42208086 > rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporat

Re: ndis0 does not associate since update to RELENG_6

Parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > wrote Fabian Keil thusly... > > > > Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I fail to get the following device working since my update > > > from RELENG_5 to

Re: ndis0 does not associate since update to RELENG_6

Parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > wrote Fabian Keil thusly... > > > > Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I fail to get the following device working since my update > > > from RELENG_5 to

Re: ndis0 does not associate since update to RELENG_6

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Paul) wrote: > > I fail to get the following device working since my update > > from RELENG_5 to RELENG_6 a few days ago: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0: class=0x028000 card=0x27128086 chip=0x42208086 > > rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > > device = '

[Fixed] Re: ndis0 does not associate since update to RELENG_6

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Paul) wrote: > > Is there a way I can provide more information? > > You haven't said yet what manufacturer/model your access point is. It's a Netgear WGT624 (Hardwareversion V3H1/Firmwareversion V1.1.125_1.1.1GR). I tried to associate ndis0 with wi0 in hostap mode and go

Re: Best release for IBM laptop R51

Graham North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am planning to load FreeBSD as a dual boot on new IBM laptop. > The model is an R51 which comes with: > Radeon 7500 - video > Intel Pro/1000 NT Mobile > Intel Pro/Wireless 2200BG > Integrated Audio > Intel 82802 UltraATA > Can anyone tell me whether the

Re: top doesn't show any Process in idle-Mode

Michael Schuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i use top mostly in idle-mode. > # top > or > # top -I > > Under releng_6 (stable p4) and the older versions, > i think down to releng_5, doesn't show a running process. By default top doesn't show system processes. If you run top -I and no process i