In most cases it's just wrong info passed from UEFI firmware about FB.
try to hardcode FrameBuffer params into vt_efb driver, to know exatly.
>>>
>>> Forgot to add importand detail: it boots and works with vt(4) using FreeBSD
>>> 11.1.
>>>
>>
>> r322258 is known working stable/11 revison
13.01.2019 0:12, Barney Wolff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:31:55PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> Que Twilight Zone theme. For your consideration: This started in December
>> when I was running 11.2-STABLE. Starting in December, when I try to backup
>> my laptop to a USB drive, it periodica
Hi!
I wonder what is status of our contrib/libarchive and bsdtar/bsdcpio etc. in
modern versions of FreeBSD
in a sense of serious bug fixing. Long story short: I faced a bug in the
libarchive bundled with 11.2
that makes it impossible to create reliable backups of live file system or its
subtre
On 01.02.2019 11:10, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019, 8:22 PM Eugene Grosbein <mailto:eu...@grosbein.net> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I wonder what is status of our contrib/libarchive and bsdtar/bsdcpio etc.
> in modern versions of FreeBSD
> in a sense
02.02.2019 6:35, Warner Losh wrote:
> They didn't fix it in 3 months, sure. But it wasn't clear from the issue
> that you had an actual fix (I certainly missed that the first time through
> when I only looked at the github and not at our bug database).
> I'd try submitting a pull request and see w
06.02.2019 3:18, Ian Lepore wrote:
>> 2019, of course. re@ does NOT make mistakes. What you fail to
>> realize is that NIST was using kqueue to check their atomic clock, and
>> they lost the race. Enjoy the rest of 2020.
>> -Alan
>>
>
> I think you meant that as a joke, but the reality is that
06.02.2019 3:55, Ian Lepore wrote:
> So your problem was most likely the gps receiver making a bad choice
> before it had enough info to make a good choice. It's one of many
> reasons why an ntp server should have at least 3 (really, at least 5)
> peers, so it can reject obviously-insane data from
Hi!
Why our 32-bit run-time linker looks for shared libraries in the /usr/local/lib
despite of its absence in /var/run/ld-elf32.so.hints
while 32-bit binary is started under FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE/amd64 ?
If it finds 64-bit version of library in /usr/local/lib, it fails immediately
and does not eve
Hi!
Long story short: 11.2-STABLE/amd64 r335757 leaked over 4600MB kernel wired
memory over 81 days uptime
out of 8GB total RAM.
Details follow.
I have a workstation running Xorg, Firefox, Thunderbird, LibreOffice and
occasionally VirtualBox for single VM.
It has two identical 320GB HDDs comb
12.02.2019 23:34, Mark Johnston wrote:
> I suspect that the "leaked" memory is simply being used to cache UMA
> items. Note that the values in the FREE column of vmstat -z output are
> quite large. The cached items are reclaimed only when the page daemon
> wakes up to reclaim memory; if there ar
12.02.2019 23:49, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 12.02.2019 23:34, Mark Johnston wrote:
>
>> I suspect that the "leaked" memory is simply being used to cache UMA
>> items. Note that the values in the FREE column of vmstat -z output are
>> quite large. The cached item
12.02.2019 23:34, Mark Johnston wrote:
> I suspect that the "leaked" memory is simply being used to cache UMA
> items. Note that the values in the FREE column of vmstat -z output are
> quite large. The cached items are reclaimed only when the page daemon
> wakes up to reclaim memory; if there ar
13.02.2019 0:57, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> In article
> eu...@grosbein.net writes:
>
>> Long story short: 11.2-STABLE/amd64 r335757 leaked over 4600MB kernel
>> wired memory over 81 days uptime
>> out of 8GB total RAM.
>
> Not a whole lot of evidence yet, but anecdotally I'm seeing the same
> th
13.02.2019 1:14, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Use following command to see how much memory is wasted in your case:
>
> vmstat -z | awk -F, '{printf "%10s %s\n", $2*$5/1024/1024, $1}' | sort -k1,1
> -rn | head
Oops, small correction:
vmstat -z | sed 's/:/,/&#
13.02.2019 1:29, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> On a 8 GB 11.2p8 box doing mostly routing:
>
> 42.3047 abd_chunk
> 40 zio_buf_131072
> 31.75 zio_data_buf_131072
>19.8901 swblk
>12.9224 RADIX NODE
>11.7344 zio_buf_16384
>10.0664 zio_data_buf_12288
>9.84375 zio_data_buf_409
13.02.2019 1:18, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 01:03:37AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> 12.02.2019 23:34, Mark Johnston wrote:
>>
>>> I suspect that the "leaked" memory is simply being used to cache UMA
>>> items. Note that the va
13.02.2019 1:42, Mark Johnston wrote:
>> Yes, I have debugger compiled into running kernel and have console access.
>> What commands should I use?
>
> I meant kgdb(1). If you can run that, try:
>
> (kgdb) p time_uptime
> (kgdb) p lowmem_uptime
>
> If you are willing to drop the system into DDB
13.02.2019 1:18, Mark Johnston wrote:
> Depending on the system's workload, it is possible for the caches to
> grow quite quickly after a reclaim. If you are able to run kgdb on the
> kernel, you can find the time of the last reclaim by comparing the
> values of lowmem_uptime and time_uptime.
(k
13.02.2019 1:50, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> I'm have same problem.
>
> According to top(1) I have 29G Wired, but only 17G Total ARC (12G
> difference! System has 32G of RAM), and this statistic shows:
>
> 5487.5 zio_data_buf_524288
>920.125 zio_data_buf_131072
>626 zio_buf_131072
13.02.2019 2:18, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On an nfs server, serving a few large files, my 32G box is showing
>
> vmstat -z | sed 's/:/,/' | awk -F, '{printf "%10s %s\n",
> $2*$5/1024/1024, $1}' | sort -k1,1 -rn | head
>11014.3 abd_chunk
> 2090.5 zio_data_buf_131072
>1142.67 mbuf_jumbo_pag
12.02.2019 23:34, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:14:31PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Long story short: 11.2-STABLE/amd64 r335757 leaked over 4600MB kernel wired
>> memory over 81 days uptime
>> out of 8GB total RAM.
>
On 13.02.2019 19:04, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 12.02.2019 23:34, Mark Johnston wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:14:31PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Long story short: 11.2-STABLE/amd64 r335757 leaked over 4600MB kernel wired
>&g
20.02.2019 3:49, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 2/19/2019 2:35 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> dd if=/dev/zero of=/tanker/test bs=1m count=10
>
> The box has 32G of RAM. If I do a
>
> # sysctl -w vfs.zfs.arc_max=12224866304
> vfs.zfs.arc_max: 32224866304 -> 12224866304
> #
>
> after WIRED memory is at 2
21.02.2019 22:27, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> The object is clearly corrupted.
>
> Thanks to your hint to readelf, I found out that it gets corrupted during
> dump(8) (or resotore, not yet analyzed).
> The obj tree contains the good version, the dump archive not.
> The dump archive is used as s
28.02.2019 23:18, Lee Damon wrote:
> I have three old FBSD 10 boxes that I need to upgrade. Ordinarily I do this
> by building a new box with the latest OS then migrating services and data.
> Unfortunately I don't have that option this time, the upgrade has to happen
> in-place. My plan is to g
Hi!
Since 11.2-RELESE, default console driver vt(4) checks ACPI table for presence
of VGA in the system.
It does not initialize console (no input, no output) if ACPI states there is no
VGA adapter.
There are PRs describing many cases when VGA is present but ACPI lies
and we have a regression co
17.03.2019 21:58, Karl Denninger wrote:
> Huh? A simple *filesystem copy* managed to force a 16Gb system into
> requiring page file backing store?
>
> I was able to complete the copy by temporarily adding the swap space
> back on (where it would be when the move was complete) but that
> requirem
18.03.2019 0:34, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Can anybody provide an example of machine where the flag is set but VGA
> works ? For me, it is set on headless NUC when there is no monitor
> attached, and then BIOS does not configure framebuffer at all.
http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/vt-4-re
18.03.2019 17:22, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> That said, did anybody considered ignoring NO_VGA FACP flag on Silvermonts
> only ? Or even better, gather SMBIOS identifications for affected BIOSes
> and ignore the flag for them ?
Is SMBIOS-bases blacklisting reliable considering future BIOS upda
26.03.2019 14:26, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> I have a FreeBSD 11.1 box with 2 public IPs that has two tunnels to another
> FreeBSD box with 1 public IP. One of these tunnels is working, the other
> isn't. Long story short: I have some experience in ipsec tunnels setup. and I
> supposed that ha
09.04.2019 7:00, Kevin P. Neal wrote:
>> My guess (given that only ada1 is reporting a blocksize mismatch) is that
>> your disks reported a 512B native blocksize. In the absence of any override,
>> ZFS will then build an ashift=9 pool.
[skip]
> smartctl 7.0 2018-12-30 r4883 [FreeBSD 11.2-RELEAS
08.05.2019 3:23, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
> I'm misunderstand what in my configuration can result core dumps a running
> daemon...
> I'm attached a sample racoon.conf. Can You check for possible problems?
> Also on one host I got a crash in another function:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0024717f in priv
20.05.2019 9:14, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2019, 6:59 PM Paul Mather, wrote:
>
>> On May 19, 2019, at 9:46 PM, tech-lists wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> context is 12-stable, zfs, bhyve
>>>
>>> I have a zvol-backed bhyve guest. Its zvol size was initially 512GB
>>> It needed to be expand
01.06.2019 19:04, Nenhum_de_Nos wrotr:
> Hi,
>
> I replaced a faulty disk from a gmirror some time ago. The array had two
> 1TB disks and I got one 2TB disk there. Now I replaced the second one and
> tried to growfs it. No good for me.
First you need to resize the mirror itself with "gmirror resi
01.06.2019 19:57, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 01.06.2019 19:04, Nenhum_de_Nos wrotr:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I replaced a faulty disk from a gmirror some time ago. The array had two
>> 1TB disks and I got one 2TB disk there. Now I replaced the second one and
>> tried to grow
12.06.2019 8:04, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a small UFS partition that is the sysvol for Samba 4 (otherwise it
> doesn't work due to ACL issues).
>
> I found that I usually have to manually fsck it on a bad reboot, even if I
> have fsck_y_enable so I added a hack to /etc/rc.d/fsck t
12.06.2019 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
>> Please show your /etc/fstab line for this UFS-inside-ZVOL and your changes
>> to rc.d/fsck.
>> Your logs do not show that fsck is started so I presume some mistake in the
>> /etc/fstab.
>> Maybe you forgot that it needs non-zero sixth field.
>
> The
12.06.2019 12:17, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
>>> The Samba 4 ZFS is from https://wiki.freebsd.org/Samba4ZFS (which I wrote..)
You should correct this page and change the line for /etc/fstab
and use non-zero value for fsck pass number.
___
freebsd-stable@f
19.07.2019 3:13, Karl Denninger wrote:
> FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE #2 r349024M: Thu Jun 13 18:01:16 CDT 2019
> k...@newfs.denninger.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/KSD-SMP
>
> Note -- no patches of any sort in the ZFS code; I am NOT running any of
> my former patch set.
>
> NewFS.denninger.ne
CC'ing Alexander Motin who comitted the change.
20.07.2019 1:21, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> I recently upgraded several file servers from 11.2 to 11.3. All of
> them boot from a ZFS pool called "tank" (the data is in a different
> pool). In a couple of instances (which caused me to have to take a
31.07.2019 22:30, mike tancsa wrote:
> While moving a pair of ZFS disks from an *very* old motherboard to a new
> one, I ran into an odd problem I had not seen before. The box was
> running just fine RELENG_10 from FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #18 r279918 on 10yr
> old MB. Boots normally and expected spee
30.09.2019 3:11, Pete French wrote:
> Its a bit worrying to me that this can happen, especially in userland.
>
> Any opinions or things people would ike me to check ?
netstat -p tcp -ss
tcpdump -i $interface -npvs0 icmp or 'tcp[tcpflags] & (tcp-rst) != 0'
___
11.10.2019 18:57, Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
>> Can you show the output of file /usr/bin/uname ?
>
> $ uname -aKU
> FreeBSD P142.sics.se 11.3-STABLE FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE #9 r353280: Mon Oct 7
> 22:16:02 CEST 2019 r...@p142.sics.se:/storage/obj/usr/src/sys/X250 amd64
> 1103500 1103500
>
> no sig
17.10.2019 12:37, Daniel Braniss wrote:
> just trying out 12,1 on a DELL PowerEdge R710, and I see:
> ...
> Oct 16 22:52:12 store-08 kernel: bce3: bce_pulse(): Warning: bootcode thinks
> driver is absent! (bc_state = 0x0023600E)
> Oct 16 22:52:13 store-08 kernel: Limiting icmp unreach response fr
09.11.2019 19:45, Scott Bennett пишет:
> The rest of this message was posted a little while ago to the
> freebsd-questions list by mistake. It was intended for freebsd-stable,
> so I am posting it here now after posting a brief apology on the other
> list.
> I have had to waste a great d
09.11.2019 19:45, Scott Bennett wrote:
> The rest of this message was posted a little while ago to the
> freebsd-questions list by mistake. It was intended for freebsd-stable,
> so I am posting it here now after posting a brief apology on the other
> list.
> I have had to waste a great
Hi!
After 1 day and 11 hours of host's uptime I observe significant leak of bhyve
instances RSS:
PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIMEWCPU COMMAND
8 root 34 200 60320M 58866M kqread 21 62.0H 692.35% bhyve:
sappdev (bhyve)
5546 root 26 20
Hi!
Recently I did routine source upgrade from 11.2-STABLE/amd64 to 11.3-STABLE
r354667
that went without any problem. After less than 2 days of uptime it paniced and
failed to reboot (hung),
screenshot is here: http://www.grosbein.net/freebsd/zpanic.png
It did not panic with 11.2-STABLE but ha
15.11.2019 13:08, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Recently I did routine source upgrade from 11.2-STABLE/amd64 to 11.3-STABLE
> r354667
> that went without any problem. After less than 2 days of uptime it paniced
> and failed to reboot (hung),
> screenshot is here: ht
15.11.2019 13:08, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Recently I did routine source upgrade from 11.2-STABLE/amd64 to 11.3-STABLE
> r354667
> that went without any problem. After less than 2 days of uptime it paniced
> and failed to reboot (hung),
> screenshot is here: ht
16.11.2019 6:24, Xin LI wrote:
> There are several leaks fixed recently, but not all of them were merged back
> to stable/11 (e.g. r341705 which may or may not be related to your issue).
>
> Personally, I'd recommend updating to 12.x for new features as they are being
> actively developed and wo
16.11.2019 6:24, Xin LI wrote:
> There are several leaks fixed recently, but not all of them were merged back
> to stable/11 (e.g. r341705 which may or may not be related to your issue).
It seems that fix deals with virtio-scsi but all guest systems use virtio-net
and ahci-hd here.
After 2 days of uptime there is a guest that should have only 2GB of RAM but
uses nearly 22G "extra":
# ps -o vsz,rss,command | grep sfile01
29234040 24851428 bhyve: sfile01 (bhyve)
# bhyvectl --vm=sfile01 --get-all | grep -B1 -A1 mem
ID Length Name
0 2048MB sysmem
1 2048KB b
18.11.2019 19:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Please point me to right direction for debugging this.
Is it normal that over 1/3rd of 360G total physical RAM is in "Laundry"
category in addition to 173G Wired?
last pid: 20372; load averages: 8.04, 7.73, 7.84
20.11.2019 16:47, Ronald Klop wrote:
> Thanks for all the advice. I am indeed looking for using jail from the
> non-root user in the host. Jailme sounds like a good solution.
>
> My use case is providing a relatively save way of giving a user the
> possibility to experiment with root rights (li
Hi!
How do I get boot messages generated by loader itself written to some log after
successfull boot?
This is generic BIOS-based 11.3-STABLE/amd64 system with syscons console driver.
/var/run/dmesg.boot starts with kernel messages without previous lines from the
loader.
Specifically, I need mes
21.11.2019 17:22, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2019, at 9:51, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> How do I get boot messages generated by loader itself written to some log
>> after successfull boot?
>> This is generic BIOS-based 11.3-STABLE/amd64 sy
21.11.2019 18:35, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> How do I get boot messages generated by loader itself written to some log
>> after successfull boot?
>> This is generic BIOS-based 11.3-STABLE/amd64 system with syscons console
>> driver.
>>
>> /var/run/dmesg.boot starts with kernel messages without pr
Hi!
Is it normal that "zfs destroy" for one ZVOL with attribute "used" equal to
2112939808 bytes (~2GB)
takes over two minutes waiting on "tx_sync_done_cv"? The pool is RAID1 over
five SSDs encrypted with GELI
having ZIL and Cache on distinct unencrypted SSD.
11.3-STABLE/amd64 r354667. System h
28.11.2019 13:46, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it normal that "zfs destroy" for one ZVOL with attribute "used" equal to
> 2112939808 bytes (~2GB)
> takes over two minutes waiting on "tx_sync_done_cv"? The pool is RAID1 over
> five SSDs enc
28.11.2019 16:38, Pete French wrote:
> On 28/Nov/2019 07:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> 28.11.2019 13:46, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Is it normal that "zfs destroy" for one ZVOL with attribute "used" equal to
>
28.11.2019 14:26, Steven Hartland wrote:
> As you mentioned it’s on SSD you could be suffering from poor TRIM
> performance from your devices
> if you run gstat -pd you’ll be able to get an indication if this is the case.
Yes, this box does have problems with poor TRIM performance.
But isn't "zf
28.11.2019 20:34, Steven Hartland wrote:
> It may well depend on the extent of the deletes occurring.
>
> Have you tried disabling TRIM to see if it eliminates the delay?
This system used mfi(4) first and mfi(4) does not support TRIM at all.
Performance was abysmal.
Now it uses mrsas(4) and aft
Hi!
I have RAIDZ1 with five GELI-encrypted SSDs da[2-6].eli (non-boot pool).
I've exported the pool, destroyed da2.eli then successfully imported pool back
in degraded state.
Then I've mounted some file systems successfully but zfs mount for next one
hung on [tx->tx_sync_done_cv]
for 4400 secon
30.11.2019 15:48, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have RAIDZ1 with five GELI-encrypted SSDs da[2-6].eli (non-boot pool).
>
> I've exported the pool, destroyed da2.eli then successfully imported pool
> back in degraded state.
> Then I've mounted some file sys
30.11.2019 0:57, Scott Bennett wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 23:18:37 +0700 Eugene Grosbein
> wrote:
>
>> 28.11.2019 20:34, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>
>>> It may well depend on the extent of the deletes occurring.
>>>
>>> Have you tried
02.12.2019 20:35, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 02/12/2019 11:27, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> The vast majority of my "destroy" operations are for snapshots, but what
>> I have seen is that, without the "-d", the command does not return until the
>> disk activity of the "destroy" finishes, but with th
07.12.2019 0:49, Eugene Kazarinov wrote:
> pkg install ng_ipacct install ng_ipacct.ko in /boot/modules/ and it
> doesnt start
>
> if I copy ng_ipacct.ko to /boot/kernel/ it didnt start with error:
> link_elf_obj: symbol tcbinfo undefined
> linker_load_file: /boot/kernel/ng_ipacct.ko - unsupported
07.12.2019 6:03, Eugene Kazarinov wrote:
> Yes. It works. Thank you very much.
>
> I delete manual copied file.
> I install ports via portsnap.
> I fetch srcs from ftp.
> And install ng_ipacct from ports.
> And option VIMAGE in port ng_ipacct was disabled. I dont know why.
> option VIMAGE in kern
07.12.2019 7:22, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Adding port maintainer to CC:
>> Yes. It works. Thank you very much.
>>
>> I delete manual copied file.
>> I install ports via portsnap.
>> I fetch srcs from ftp.
>> And install ng_ipacct from ports.
>> And optio
10.12.2019 23:08, Mark Martinec пишет:
> 2019-12-10 16:35, Marc Branchaud wrote:
>
>> On 2019-12-10 9:18 a.m., Mark Martinec wrote:
>>> Commenting on a thread from 2018-12 and from 2019-09-20, with my solution
>>> to the boot problem at the end, in case anyone is still interested.
>>
>> Thank you
19.12.2019 11:21, George Michaelson wrote:
> I tried an install on a new Dell 740, which has dual M2 256GB internal
> SSD on a "Boss" controller. It exposes as AHCI.
>
> It wouldn't recognize these as installable drives as raw devices. If
> you use the Boss to define a virtual drive in RAID-1 it
23.02.2020 3:01, Nuno Teixeira wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that STABLE and CURRENT have base subversion at version 1.10.0.
>
> Why is base svn not updated to last LTS 1.10.6?
You are supposed to install /usr/ports/devel/subversion (1.13.0 at the moment)
for any usage other than updating FreeB
25.02.2020 4:37, Minoru TANABE wrote:
CC'ing to author of mentioned revision.
> Hi, all.
> I'm 12-stable user.
> My system upgrade from 12.1-stable_r357351(2020-02-01) to
> r358294(2020-02-24).
> After upgrading, I can't input '\', '|', '_' symbol.
>
> I use vt console driver and jp.capsctrl.kbd
21.03.2020 6:41, Niclas Zeising wrote:
> [ This is cross-posted across several mailing lists for maximum visibility.
> Please respect reply-to and keep replies to x...@freebsd.org . Thank you! ]
>
> In order to improve support when using evdev to manage input devices, in
> particular keyboards
29.03.2020 1:53, Andrea Brancatelli via freebsd-stable wrote:
> If anyone is interested please feel free to contact me otherwise I'll
> just delete it :-)
What is most recent version of FreeBSD that has this problem with bsnmpd
crashing?
Please rebuild bsnmpd with debugging enabled, if you have
12.04.2020 0:36, Chris Ross wrote:
> I have a FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE server that is my router, using a ZFS mirror (of
> two GPT disks) as it’s disk. It’s many years old, and has only been
> misbehaving like this for a day or so. I’m trying to figure out what’s wrong.
>
> I confirmed that interne
12.04.2020 2:25, Chris Ross пишет:
>
>> On Apr 11, 2020, at 14:33, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>
>> 12.04.2020 0:36, Chris Ross wrote:
>>
>>> I have a FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE server that is my router, using a ZFS mirror
>>> (of two GPT disks) as it’s
12.04.2020 11:41, Chris wrote:
> Sorry for the ling title. But wasn't sure how make my
> question more concise.
> Why did we begin making an initial console "graphics mode"
> by default. My understanding has always been that (Free)BSD
> has been a "Server by default", and a Desktop after an initia
12.04.2020 21:37, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> I have a server I don't have physical access to right now, which has a broken
> SATA disk that produces mostly errors (but not entirely).
>
> The disk has two partitions that are part of a zpool each. I can't bring the
> system up with this disk being on
12.04.2020 21:57, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>> Is there a way, ideally in the loader, to tell the kernel to ignore ada1
>>> and/or ahcich5? Or can I force ZFS some other way to ignore the disk? I do
>>> have a spare disk I can use to replace the failed one, but I can't get the
>>> machine into a st
12.04.2020 23:30, Stefan Bethke пишет:
> Am 12.04.2020 um 18:29 schrieb Eugene Grosbein <mailto:eu...@grosbein.net>>:
>>
>> 12.04.2020 21:57, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>
>>>>> Is there a way, ideally in the loader, to tell the kernel to ignore ada1
>&g
16.04.2020 16:31, David Marec wrote:
> The manpage and usage output doesn't match.
>
> The manpage tells us that this option should be used alone on the command
> line, as any other command will be discarded.
>
> The usage ouput does not mention the "-r" flag but "cmr" (with a typo).
>
> Both
24.04.2020 11:26, Igor Pokrovsky пишет:
> Hello all,
>
> I haven’t been using FreeBSD since 8-STABLE times. Recently I tried to
> install latest 12-STABLE on my old computer.
> But even during initial boot up loader hangs. Eventually I was able to
> proceed with installation after replacing loa
Hi!
It seems that clang-6 supplied with 11.2 cannot build clang-9 in stable/11 for
i386,
so buildworld is broken. Details are here:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246274
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freeb
Hi!
It seems that clang-6 supplied with 11.2 cannot build clang-9 in stable/9 for
i386,
so buildworld is broken. Details are here:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246274
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebs
16.05.2020 16:51, Thomas Zander via freebsd-stable wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can the following be done these days?
> - Encrypted ZFS root pool on RAID-Z
> - Supply the key for the encrypted root pool during boot via USB thumb drive
> - No keyboard is attached to the machine
> - No /boot on the thumb d
27.05.2020 22:11, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I have a ZFS dataset about 10T of actual size (may be more) that I need to
> send over a very laggy connection. So I'm sending it from the shell-script
> that reattempts to send it after a short timeout, retrieving the send token
> fi
21.05.2020 8:23, Donald Wilde wrote:
> The installation -- whole disk, AUTO, GPT, all options selected --
> downloads everything and appears to match all checksums and complete
> successfully but when I reboot, it goes immediately into the PXE boot,
> failing with no DHCP success. I've tried both
14.06.2020 12:21, Donald Wilde wrote:
> Since I am using this mule as a dev system for a server-based
> application, I have no WM or GUI activated. I really would like to
> have the virtual consoles back, and I will gladly learn from what I
> did to mess it up. :D
Can you boot it with distributio
15.06.2020 18:10, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> I am running FreeBSD 11.3. Whenever I inserted some 20 year old CD (backups
> on CD-R) which is currently unreadable the system is trying to read the CD
> even after I want to eject it by button in the CD drive or "eject" command.
>
> These messages a
22.06.2020 3:56, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> One of the upstream problems is that there is not really any
> authoritative performance regression log being built up, so it is hard
> to see where such regressions were introduced. Somebody then has to
> spend a lot of time tracking down each and every re
22.06.2020 21:56, Andrea Brancatelli via freebsd-stable wrote:
> I have an old 10.3 machine with sendmail 8.15.2 that's been working ok
> for a long time.
>
> We have a simple mailterable rule that looks like:
>
> schema31.itdbmail-lmtpd[10.33.whatever]
>
> That we use to forward mail in
25.06.2020 18:42, Donald Wilde wrote:
> Thanks, Kevin! My laptop's BIOS is old enough that it balked when I
> tried to boot from a GPT setup of 12.1R. One Of These Days I'll fix
> that but the MBR works and I needed to move on.
>
> We'll get there! :D
gpart is not for GPT, it is for "GEOM Partit
26.06.2020 1:30, Donald Wilde wrote:
> Here's 'pstat -s' on the i3 (which registers as cpu HAMMER):
>
> Device 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity
> /dev/ada0s1b 335544320 33554432 0%
> /dev/ada0s1d 335544320 33554432 0%
> Total67108864
19.07.2020 21:17, mike tancsa wrote:
> Are there any tweaks that can be done to speed up or improve zfs
> metadata performance ? I have a backup server with a lot of snapshots
> (40,000) and just doing a listing can take a great deal of time. Best
> case scenario is about 24 seconds, worst case,
22.07.2020 2:37, mike tancsa wrote:
>> Something else special about the setup.
>> output of "top -b"
>>
>
> ports are right now being built in a VM, but the problem (zrepl hanging)
> and zfs list -t snapshots taking forever happens regardless
>
> PID USERNAMETHR PRI NICE SIZERES STAT
22.07.2020 20:02, mike tancsa wrote:
>
> On 7/22/2020 1:29 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>> 22.07.2020 2:37, mike tancsa wrote:
>>
>>>> Something else special about the setup.
>>>> output of "top -b"
>>>>
>>> ports are right
27.07.2020 5:16, Joe Clarke wrote:
> About two weeks ago, I upgraded from the latest 11-stable to the latest
> 12-stable. After that, I periodically see the network throughput come to a
> near standstill. This FreeBSD machine is an ESXi VM with two interfaces. It
> acts as a router. It uses
11.08.2020 20:49, Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
> I have since long compiled sendmail in base with SASL using a src.conf
> like this:
>
> # sendmail with SASL required for outgoing SMTP AUTH, see:
> # https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/SMTP-Auth.html
> # depends on port security/cyrus-sasl2
> S
201 - 300 of 597 matches
Mail list logo
