On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 09:12:05AM +0200, Matthias Gamsjager wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Do I need to build world when a new ZFS related commit took place or
> is a build kernel enough?
>
> eg svn commit: r208334:
> Modified:
> stable/8/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zdb/zdb.c
> stable/8/cddl/contrib/ope
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 02:45:46PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 02:12:13PM -0700, Richard Lee wrote:
> > vfs.zfs.zio.use_uma is already 0. It looks to be the default, as I never
> > touched it.
>
> Okay, just checking, because the default did change at one point
And ch
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:45:14AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Someone familiar with this new infrastructure will need to reach out to
> Bruce Allen and work with him to get smartctl working with the new
> AHCI->CAM interface.
Apparently this code is in smartmontools SVN already:
http://source
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 09:16:41AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> Thanks for bringing up this topic here. I have drives showing up close to
> 80 load cycle counts here. Guess it's time for that fix... :-|
Device Model: WDC WD10EACS-00ZJB0
Firmware Version: 01.01B01
Serial Number:WD-WCASxx
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 11:31:55AM -0500, Peter C. Lai wrote:
> Also does anybody know if benching dd if=/dev/zero onto a zfs volume that
> has compression turned on might affect what dd (which is getting what it
> knows from vfs/vmm) might report?
Absolutely!
Compression on:
4294967296 bytes tra
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:16:57PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Just some random data. I know when I was reading about ZFS I did
> come across some vague notion that zfs wanted the entire drive to
> better deal with queueing, not sure if that was official Sun docs or
> some random blog though
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 01:04:20PM -0700, Steven Schlansker wrote:
> I'm also running ZFS and wanted to share my experiences. It doesn't
> cope well with low-memory environments, but I've successfully run with
> 2GB ram and 3TB disk with no problems on both i386 and amd64. amd64
> needs a little
Hi all,
Running today's RELENG_7 (although 7.0-RELEASE has the same problem),
GENERIC kernel on an amd64 and I can't seem to get a da(4) device for
any arrays bigger than 2TB.
dmesg:
<...>
ciss0: port 0x4000-0x40ff mem 0xfdf0-0xfdff,0xfdef
-0xfdef0fff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci10
ci
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 01:19:33AM -0700, Paul Saab wrote:
> Emil:
> > Running today's RELENG_7 (although 7.0-RELEASE has the same problem),
> > GENERIC kernel on an amd64 and I can't seem to get a da(4) device for
> > any arrays bigger than 2TB.
>
> Please try the following patch:
>
> http://yogu
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:47:38PM +0200, Morgan Wesstr?m wrote:
> You can benchmark the encryption subsytem only, like this:
>
> # kldload geom_zero
> # geli onetime -s 4096 -l 256 gzero
> # sysctl kern.geom.zero.clear=0
> # dd if=/dev/gzero.eli of=/dev/null bs=1M count=512
I don't mean to take
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 01:49:54PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Emil Mikulic wrote:
[...]
> > kernel`SHA256_Transform 1178 6.3%
> > kernel`rijndaelEncrypt 5574 29.7%
> &g
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:16:52PM -0700, Freddie Cash wrote:
> I don't know for sure if it's the same on FreeBSD, but on Solaris, ZFS will
> disable the onboard disk cache if the vdevs are not whole disks.
pjd@ has stated in the past that this doesn't apply to FreeBSD:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pi
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:34:41AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> I'm not sure how you arrive at this number; even with -CURRENT (on i386,
> with all debug symbols), I could store about 4 complete kernels on such
> a filesystem:
>
> $ du -hs /boot/kernel*
> 122M/boot/kernel
I get about the sa
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:53:58PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> I'm seeing essentially the same think on an 8.0-BETA1 box with an 8-disk
> raidz1 pool. Every once in a while the system makes it to 0.05% done
> and gives a vaguely reasonable rebuild time, but it quickly drops back
> to reports 0.00
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 04:56:11PM -0400, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> However, after a short period of torrent activity, the machine running
> the firewall becomes extremely slow and lagged for all network traffic,
> but appears to be operating fine locally. Remote connections via ssh
> become e
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:45:39AM +0200, Vitezslav Novy wrote:
> I used net-snmpd before, but I was not able to use HC_* counters. If
> I understand situation, bsnmpd creates 64bit counters from system 32
> bit counters, but net-snmpd does not. (Maybe I'm wrong).
This used to be the case, but mor
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 09:20:21AM +0200, Mark Stapper wrote:
> updating a zfs filesystem which you are running from is next to
> impossible.
[citation needed] :)
> So, i would recommend setting up gmirror to mirror your whole disks,
> install the base system(boot and "world") on a small UFS sli
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:27:40AM +0200, Mark Stapper wrote:
> Emil Mikulic wrote:
> > As Thomas Backman pointed out, this means you won't get self-healing.
> >
> self-healing sounds very nice, but with mirrorring you have data on two
> discs, so in that case there n
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:26:29AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:03:57PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote:
> > Why doesn't rstat() have a manpage or a function prototype in the
> > /usr/include/rpcsvc/rstat.h header?
>
> Maybe it is supposed to b
installworld failed because the /usr/include/crypto/ directory didn't
exist when `make installworld' tried to copy /usr/src/sys/opencrypto/*.h
there.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:33:01AM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
> Emil Mikulic wrote:
> >installworld failed because the /usr/include/crypto/ directory didn't
> >exist
>
> It was fixed around 0507 GMT 22 Nov.
Sorry about the noise. My cvsup was from about 0200 GMT.
To
22 matches
Mail list logo
