Wiadomość napisana przez Andrey Zonov w dniu 20 maj 2012, o godz. 15:23:
> On 5/15/12 1:23 AM, Andrey Zonov wrote:
>> On 5/14/12 12:29 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:27:11PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
Hi,
I've got a repeatable panic on latest 9.0-STABLE and
Wiadomość napisana przez Andrey Zonov w dniu 20 maj 2012, o godz. 15:23:
> On 5/15/12 1:23 AM, Andrey Zonov wrote:
>> On 5/14/12 12:29 AM, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:27:11PM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
Hi,
I've got a repeatable panic on latest 9.0-STABLE and
Wiadomość napisana przez Hub- FreeBSD w dniu 1 gru 2012, o godz. 20:37:
> Eagerly awaiting the %cpu ability that is in 10, I'm starting to play with
> using this … not so much to deny, but to allow me to more accurately
> calculate usage …
>
> when I do an 'rctl -u' for a jail, I see two values
Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 17:54:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to duplicate the following ACL:
> # file: /data/shared/
> # owner: harry
> # group: harry
> group:1stgroup:r-x---a-R-c--s:fd:allow
> group:2ndgroup:rwxp--a-R-c--s:-d:allow
> gro
Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 16:08:
> Hello,
>
> I think there's a confusion in the man page setfacl(1).
>
> In my tests, "D" means "delete_child" and "d" "delete"; like it's true
> for other NFSv4 implementations. But manpage tells the other way around.
Wiadomość napisana przez Eitan Adler w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz. 20:05:
> On 8 February 2013 13:46, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
>> Wiadomość napisana przez Harald Schmalzbauer w dniu 8 lut 2013, o godz.
>> 16:08:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I think the
Wiadomość napisana przez Peter Ankerstål w dniu 2 mar 2013, o godz. 16:21:
> Hi!
>
> Im trying to limit memory usage for jails with the rctl API. But I don't
> really get it.
>
> I have compiled the kernel with the right options and rctl show me stuff like:
> jail:jail22:memoryuse:deny=268435456
Wiadomość napisana przez Peter Ankerstål w dniu 2 mar 2013, o godz. 17:18:
> On Mar 2, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
>>>
>>
>> [..]
>>
>> Could you please do "jls jid name" and verify that a jail named "jail20" is
>
Wiadomość napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox w dniu 29 sie
2013, o godz. 23:35:
> So I have a system running:
>
> FreeBSD walk.dclg.ca 9.2-RC3 FreeBSD 9.2-RC3 # r254952: Wed Aug 28 03:02:55
> EDT 2013 r...@walk.dclg.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STRIKE i386
>
> and it has two 2T SATA disks. To ke
Wiadomość napisana przez Zaphod Beeblebrox w dniu 31 sie
2013, o godz. 00:49:
> Because someone said that there would be no logging of unerlying ATA errors
> without verbose, I rebooted with verbose and tried the same make -j4 again...
> and here is the relatively similar core.txt.5
>
> https:
It's been a while since I last touched that part of code, but I believe
the "swapuse" limit is swap reservation. In other words, the amount of
swap that would be used if the system had to swap, in the worst case
scenario.
On 0329T1151, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Hello Edward,
> I am trying to cont
On 0703T0850, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi Glen,
>
> Here's the PR you asked for:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201299
>
> I've discussed the merge with dchagin@, and he couldn't do it between
> code slush and co
On 0711T1956, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> r284665 causes ahci(4) to fail with timeouts when using MSI (the default).
What's the hardware?
> 'hint.ahci.0.msi=0' is one way to make ahci(4) working with r284665, but
> obviously not the desired solution, it just disables usage of an MSI
FreeBSD Project Quarterly Status Report - 3rd Quarter 2018
With FreeBSD having gone all the way to 12, it is perhaps useful to
take a look back at all the things that have been accomplished, in
terms of many visible changes, as well as all the things that happen
behind the scenes to e
FreeBSD Project Quarterly Status Report - 4th Quarter 2018
Since we are still on this island among many in this vast ocean of the
Internet, we write this message in a bottle to inform you of the work
we have finished and what lies ahead of us. These deeds that we have
wrought with our
FreeBSD Project Quarterly Status Report - 1st Quarter 2019
As spring leads into summer, we reflect back on what the FreeBSD
project has accomplished in the first quarter of 2019. Events included
FOSDEM and AsiaBSDCon, the FreeBSD Journal is now free to everyone,
ASLR is available in -C
FreeBSD Project Quarterly Status Report - 2nd Quarter 2019
This quarter our report includes some interesting topics easily
accessible to anyone, even if you are not a programmer: we report the
link to a presentation of the 2019 FreeBSD survey results at BSDCan
2019 and describe an inte
On 0103T1602, Lee Damon wrote:
> I am (reluctantly) replacing am-utils (amd) with autofs. To do this I
> need to replace a lot of functionality that I've had embedded for a very
> long time and which my users absolutely rely on. I have two (so far)
> questions that I need to solve before I can proc
On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a FreeBSD 10.2 server running as iSCSI target. Another FreeBSD
> 10.2 is an initiator and has several targets used.
>
> When I add a target and reload its config with 'service ctld reload',
> the FreeBSD initiator server panics. It's r
On 1015T2005, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
> Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> > On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have a FreeBSD 10.2 server running as iSCSI target. Another FreeBSD
> >> 10.2 is an initiator and has severa
On 1018T2321, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
> Frank de Bot wrote:
> > Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> >> On 1015T2005, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
> >>> Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> >>>> On 1014T2316, Frank de Bot (lists) wrote:
> >>&
On 0915T1000, John Dison via freebsd-stable wrote:
> Hello and have a nice day!
>
> I try to limit cpu usage for multi-threaded process on a multi-core machine.
> I use the following command:
> # rctl -a user:myusernm:pcpu:deny=200/user
> And I expect (please correct me if I am wrong) that all pro
On 0124T1650, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Since the removal of NTFS support, it is unclear how to get USB drives
> formatted as NTFS (or ExFAT) to automatically mount. Prior to FreeBSD 10 it
> was possible to replace /sbin/mount_ntfs with a script that would generate
> appropriate options and exec /usr/
On 0125T1943, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 25.01.2016 19:14, Andrzej Bylicki wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I mounted all of my NTFS formatted drives via fuse from the
> > sysutils/fusefs-ntfs port. I am not entirely sure, but assuming that it is
> > possible to automate the mounting procedure by adding
On 0125T1756, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Since the removal of NTFS support, it is unclear how to get USB drives
> > formatted as NTFS (or ExFAT) to automatically mount. Prior to FreeBSD 10 it
> > was possible to replace /sbin/mount_ntfs with a script that would generate
> >
On 0404T0549, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:28:49AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > ...
> > A couple of the machines use autofs & automountd to make the ports tree
> > available on demand. (In the case of the 3rd, I manually mount it when
> > needed, but that's not at issue
On 0419T0906, Melissa Jenkins wrote:
> I've been trying to get reboot -r to work but get an error that
> kern.proc.pathname is undefined. It then drops to single user mode.
>
> Interestingly I've checked the value of kern.proc.pathname and it appears to
> be undefined on all the OS boxes we hav
On 0502T2326, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
> > On 0419T0906, Melissa Jenkins wrote:
> > > I've been trying to get reboot -r to work but get an error that
> > > kern.proc.pathname is undefined. I
On 0621T0835, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Guys, does someone have experience with multiple LUNs on a target in
> ctld ? Recently I was installing ESX on a bunch of diskless hosts,
> connected to FreeBSD ctld. I was organizing them inside one target,
> multiple LUNs. As soon as the _cou
On 0818T1958, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm using zvol clones with iSCSI. Perdiodically I renew them and destroy
> the old ones, but sometimes the clone gets stuck and refuses to be
> destroyed:
>
> (I'm showing the full sequence so it's self explanatory who is who's parent)
>
> [root@
On 0118T1448, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Could someone recommend a decent 40Gbit adapter that are proven to be
> working under FreeBSD ? The intended purpose - iSCSI traffic, not much
> pps, but rates definitely above 10G. I've tried Supermicro-manufactured
> Intel XL710 ones (two boards,
> On 4 Mar 2017, at 11:50, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I have a file with the following ACL (in fact, a whole tree with files
> like that):
>
> srv$ getfacl myfile
> # file: myfile
> # owner: myuser
> # group: domain-users
> group:myuser:rw-p--aARWcCo-:---:allow
>group@:
On 0313T1206, Pete French wrote:
> I have a number of machines in Azure, all booting from ZFS and, until
> the weekend, running 10.3 perfectly happily.
>
> I started upgrading these to 11. The first went fine, the second would
> not boot. Looking at the boot diagnistics it is having problems findi
On 0316T1004, Warner Losh wrote:
> [[ stupid mouse ]]
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 6:06 AM, Pete French
> > wrote:
> >>> I don't like the delay and retry approach at all.
> >>
> >> Its not ideal, but it is what we do for UFS after all...
>
On 0313T1206, Pete French wrote:
> I have a number of machines in Azure, all booting from ZFS and, until
> the weekend, running 10.3 perfectly happily.
>
> I started upgrading these to 11. The first went fine, the second would
> not boot. Looking at the boot diagnistics it is having problems findi
On 0922T1036, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have old 11-STABLE as an iSCSI server, but out of the blue I
> encountered weird problem: only 579 targets can be created. I mean, I am
> fully aware that the out-of-the-box limit is 128 targets, with is
> enforced by the CTL_MAX_PORTS define,
On 0519T2035, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after 10 years I replaced my personal desktop machine (FreeBSD8 ->
> FreeBSD12).
> While aware of OS progress, I haven't followed any development on the
> X11 planet.
>
> To my surprise, things were in better shape 10 years ago, regarding
>
On 0629T1330, Frank (lists) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a HA setup with LIO on linux. The exact set up is can be found
> here: http://docs.ceph.com/docs/mimic/rbd/iscsi-target-cli/
>
> I'm trying to use FreeBSD as initiator for this, but I can't manage to
> get it working. Is this kind of setup su
38 matches
Mail list logo
