Gary Kline wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 10:41:33PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>> On Saturday, 26. February 2005 22:19, Gary Kline wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:49:00PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>> > > On Saturday, 26. February 2005 13:05, Godwin Stewart wrote:
>> > > > On
On Wednesday 16 of November 2005 04:26, James Long wrote:
> After hours of head-banging over the past couple of days,
> I have finally succeeded in installing EITHER
> xorg-clients-6.8.2_1 OR xterm-206_1. Previously,
> installing either port told me that it conflicted
> with the other, in spite of
Joel Hatton wrote:
> What was the rationale behind changing this behaviour for 206_1?
That xterm should install as xterm and not xterm-static.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubsc
On Wednesday 23 of November 2005 01:11, Joel Hatton wrote:
> > Joel Hatton wrote:
> > > What was the rationale behind changing this behaviour for 206_1?
> >
> > That xterm should install as xterm and not xterm-static.
>
> This is certainly sensible, however it appears that the onus has now been
> p
On Wednesday 23 of November 2005 01:11, Joel Hatton wrote:
[snip]
> # pkg_info -I xorg-clients\*
> xorg-clients-6.8.2_1 X client programs and related files from X.Org
>
> # portupgrade -p xterm
>
> ... (building)
>
> ---> Installing the new version via the port
> ===> Installing for xterm-206_1
>
