I'm trying to get real hotplugging to work. My motherboard uses the Via
VT8251 southbridge which, according to the whitesheet, supports SATA
hotplugging:
http://www.via.com.tw/en/downloads/whitepapers/chipsets/southbridge/chipsets_vt8251.pdf
I set the SATA controller to the AHCI mode in my B
it depends on the chipset you're using."
So my question (I think): it's been a few years since that was written;
is it still the case that inserting a drive might not print a message?
Why not? Does this mean I'll have to manually run atacontrol and can't
automate it wi
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
David Ehrmann wrote:
How can I avoid all this and get the drive to be recognized
automatically? Can I do this with devd? Did I do what I needed to
correctly set up hotplugging?
Can you enable verbose mode in /boot/loader.conf
(echo 'boot_verbose="YES&
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
...
Linux's libata driver has a quirk for VIA AHCI:
/* vt8251 doesn't clear BSY on signature FIS reception,
* request follow-up softreset.
*/
If i right understand it issues softreset for VIA controllers just
after hardreset. And after softres
Andrew Snow wrote:
On 7.x (where ZFS is really quite broken for server use - don't waste
too much time on it)
How exactly is it broken? I know there are some issues, but so serious
you'd say it's broken?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
h
I'm using 7.0-RELEASE.
When there's heavy network traffic through the vr0 interface, I see lots
of "vr0: rx packet lost" messages, and occasional "vr0: watchdog
timeout" messages. I googled and found some information, but it was on
an earlier version of FreeBSD, and there weren't any solution
Wow. That really is a lot, but I might just wait for the final release,
though with this command, it might not be such a big deal:
freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.1-RC1
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 07:49 PM 1/10/2009, David Ehrmann wrote:
I'm using 7.0-RELEASE.
Ideas? Is there any addit
I tried to export/unmount my zpool:
# zpool export tank
cannot unmount '/tank': Device busy
# zfs unmount /tank
cannot unmount '/tank': Device busy
but it wouldn't, so, after closing everything that could be using it, I
tried again. No luck. Then I tried to see if I forgot something:
# fst
David Ehrmann wrote:
# fstat -m /tank
I guess I should have used a different flag, but no luck there, either
USER CMD PID FD MOUNT INUM MODE SZ|DV R/W
NAME
# lsof | grep tank
I did fix it. I had a runaway bash process (that kill -s HUP fixed,
oddly enough), but
I have a zpool that consists for a two-drive mirror. The two times I
took the zpool offline, I had to resilver one of the drives (the same
drive both times) when I imported it back. All drives in the pool
show no read, write, or checksum errors and are new, so I'm looking to
a software problem be
Wes Morgan wrote:
What does "zdb /dev/ad10.eli" show?
First, a quick update: removing the drive without ANY unmounts (I
accidentally pulled it from the backplane) didn't cause any problems. I
plugged it back in, reset the atachannel (there's a bug somewhere
related to that, but I can live wit
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Pete French
wrote:
>> a software problem before hardware. Both drives are encrypted geli
>> devices. I tried to reproduce the error with 1GB disk images (vs
>
> This is probably a silly question, but are you sure that the drives
> are not auto detaching ? I had b
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:21 PM, David Ehrmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Pete French
> wrote:
>>> a software problem before hardware. Both drives are encrypted geli
>>> devices. I tried to reproduce the error with 1GB disk images (vs
>>
>> Th
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Michael Proto wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:24 PM, David Ehrmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:21 PM, David Ehrmann wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Pete French
>>> wrote:
>>>>> a software
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:08 PM, David Ehrmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Michael Proto wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:24 PM, David Ehrmann wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:21 PM, David Ehrmann wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:12 PM, David Ehrmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:08 PM, David Ehrmann wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Michael Proto wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 4:24 PM, David Ehrmann wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:21 PM,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Wes Morgan wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, David Ehrmann wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:21 PM, David Ehrmann wrote:
>>
>> In the /dev/ad8.eli that zfs doesn't recognize, I found a 16 byte
>> string that was repeated a lot,
Wes Morgan wrote:
You might try creating the pool, saving the first 512k of each block
device to a file, then export the pool and repeat, then import (or try
to). Run zdb on each file and compare the output. From creation to
export to import they should only differ by the "state" in the top
le
It's been reported before, but I haven't seen anything new. vge devices
won't autonegotiate to gigabit speeds, and if I set the media to
1000baseTX, ifconfig reports "no carrier." This was with two different
interfaces on the other end, one a switch, the other another computer
(but not a vge
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 05:10:58PM -0700, David Ehrmann wrote:
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 09:22:02PM -0800, David Ehrmann wrote:
It's been reported before, but I haven't seen anything new. vge devices
Becau
20 matches
Mail list logo
