you're using in here will have the
> same effect as the twelve disks in only one pool ? (the space here is the
> sum of both pools ?)
Having an enormous pool consisting of dozens of disks is not the
actual problem. Having the pool consist of large (> 9 disks)
raidz/raidz2 "gro
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>
> On Thu, July 9, 2009 09:25, Dan Naumov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, July 9, 2009 08:25, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
>>>> Hi, all,
>>>&
kipped and 0 failed
> ---> Session ended at: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:58:46 +0200 (consumed 00:00:15)
>
> ---OUTPUT STOP---
>
> I've never got an error like this. What am I to do to make it work correctly
> again?
What is the method you use for updating your ports tree? Wha
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Peter
Jeremy wrote:
> On 2009-Jul-09 15:39:35 +0300, Dan Naumov wrote:
>>A single 40 disk raidz (DO NOT DO THIS) will have 40 disks total, 39
>>disks worth of space and will definately explode on you sooner rather
>>than later (probabl
for more than a month now after I
> disabled powerd... (although I want to have it enabled)
I hope you can get some crash dumps for the developers to look at,
Attilio was trying to help me but sadly the machine had to be put into
active use so I could no longer play with FreeBSD due t
shutdowns, the only
difference was that I was on amd64. I too was running powerd on the
system, but it didn't cross my mind that it could've been the culprit.
Hopefully I will get a chance to test FreeBSD again on the same
hardware at some point, with and without powerd.
Rather sad if powerd
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/7/7 Dan Naumov :
>> I just got a panic following by a reboot a few seconds after running
>> "portsnap update", /var/log/messages shows the following:
>>
>> Jul 7 03:49:38 atom syslogd: kernel boot
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2009/7/23 C. C. Tang :
>> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> 2009/7/22 C. C. Tang :
>
> Could that one (on i386) be related?
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134584
>
I have no idea about it but I can tell the diff
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:25 PM, C. C. Tang wrote:
>> Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> 2009/9/17 C. C. Tang :
>>
>> Dan, is that machine equipped with Hyperthreading?
>>
>> Attilio
>
> Yes. It's an Intel Atom 330, which is a dualcore CPU with HT (4 cores
> visible in "top" as
101 - 109 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
