FreeBSD 8.1 regression in x86bios.c

2011-02-25 Thread Craig Boston
Hi all, My laptop (Toshiba Portege R100) stopped working with an early boot hang at some point between 8.0 and 8.1. After it broke last year I had ended up just reverting to an earlier kernel, but finally found the time to do a binary search and narrow it down. The offending commit is: http:

Re: Sysinstall replacement

2007-06-03 Thread Craig Boston
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:36:15AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > See http://wiki.freebsd.org/finstall . Somewhat tangental, the only thing that really jumps out at me is this: > I propose the UFS+gjournal be the default FS type (even for > root+boot?) I think this is not such a good idea. While I

Re: Quation about HZ kernel option

2007-10-04 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:32:39PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > In that case, I would recommend not to override the > default at all (which is 1000). ISTM that it would be better to use kern.hz=100 in this case. My reasoning is that a web server shouldn't be terribly sensitive to latency, so it'

Re: em device hangs on ifconfig alias ...

2006-07-11 Thread Craig Boston
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 02:56:27PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 05:55:23PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote: > > >On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:11:36AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > >Of course, any reasonable administrator would configure > > > > > > interface FastEthernet0/1 > > >

Re: gjournal and Softupdates

2006-09-12 Thread Craig Boston
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:47:50PM +0200, Teufel wrote: > Well, thats why i actually don't find journaling filesystems very sexy. > So the question is, if it is still safe to use fsck on a gjournal > enabled FS ? Well, if you just want to check, you can take a snapshot and run fsck -n on it. Th

Re: em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting (6.1-STABLE)

2006-09-15 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 02:27:29AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > Them manual page em(4) mentions trying another cable when the watchdog > timeout happens, so I tried that. But it didn't help. > Is there anything I can test to (help) debug this? > It happens a lot when my machine is under load. (100

Re: iSCSI HBAs

2006-09-16 Thread Craig Boston
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 03:35:52PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote: > being involved with the iSCSI initiator for FreeBSD, I can't see where > this can help for a diskless host, or in other words, what's > wrong with NFS? Well, for one thing since iSCSI is designed for SAN use, the filesystem can safel

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

2006-09-29 Thread Craig Boston
I've been experiencing this problem too, along with my USB keyboard acting 'wonky' (stuttering from time to time). For me at least it seems to be tied to CPU usage, meaning it's probably related to the taskqueue or maybe even the scheduler. I can also reproduce the problem on a much bigger scale

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

2006-09-29 Thread Craig Boston
Doesn't seem to have any effect for me (other than high sys% times). qemu is really good at provoking my em0 to timeout. On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:27:41AM -0700, David G Lawrence wrote: >Attached is a simple user program that will immediately cause pretty much > all of the network drivers (at

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

2006-09-29 Thread Craig Boston
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:37:40PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > What might be useful for someone who can provoke this, is to configure > your kernel with MUTEX_PROFILING, then do the following: > > > > This will help to show whether something is causing Giant starvation. I'm currently building a

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

2006-09-29 Thread Craig Boston
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:37:40PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > and provide access to that file. > > This will help to show whether something is causing Giant starvation. http://www.gank.org/freebsd/stats.out That's after about 25 seconds of the em0 interface being unable to receive because of

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

2006-09-29 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:48:42PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/usb_fastintr_RELENG_6.diff At first glance it appeared to work, but I'm about to do some more testing since I just discovered that I have to kldload something (anything) first in order to reproduce the

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

2006-09-29 Thread Craig Boston
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 08:19:04PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 01:48:42PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/usb_fastintr_RELENG_6.diff > > At first glance it appeared to work, but I'm about to do some more > testing

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

2006-09-30 Thread Craig Boston
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 12:14:17AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > >One thing this patch definitely did do though, is break the nvidia > >driver pretty badly. Couldn't keep the X server running for more than a > >minute before it froze solid. Lots of Xid: blah blah blah messages. > >Yes I remembered t

Re: CALL FOR TESTERS! [Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2]

2006-09-30 Thread Craig Boston
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 02:39:06PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Which is odd since the hypothesis Scott was working on should have > > > shown up clearly in the mutex trace, but did not. > > > > But it is consistent with there being a beat-frequency problem with > > respect to the scheduler.

Re: Patch available for shared em interrupts (Re: em, bge, network problems survey.)

2006-10-27 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 10:34:25PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Please let Scott and I know whether or not this patch works for you > (in addition to the information previously requested, if you have not > already sent it). Unfortunately it is only a workaround, but it > points to an underlying p

New em driver breaks jumbo frames

2006-11-02 Thread Craig Boston
Don't have much time right now, but wanted to report that the new em driver in -STABLE breaks jumbo frame support for me. With it in the kernel and this card: em1: port 0xe8c0-0xe8ff mem 0xfe18-0xfe19 irq 18 at device 12.0 on pci2 I'm unable to send an ethernet frame bigger than 2034 b

Re: New em driver breaks jumbo frames

2006-11-02 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 09:27:14PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:09:29PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > Yes, this is the second report I've had, other came to me personally. > > There is already a PR about it. Ah, thanks, guess I should have searched there first... Craig

Re: ggate still broken on 6.2-RC1 for amd64.

2006-12-11 Thread Craig Boston
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 02:47:41AM -0500, David Gilbert wrote: > That doesn't square with my experience. Although bigger buffers could > be involved in a performance problem, what we're dealing with here is > a _zero_ traffic situation. It seems that it works enough for tasting > to be successful

Stuttering I/O on DPT RAID

2004-12-05 Thread Craig Boston
Almost sent this to -current, I'm not used to 5.3 being stable yet... I recently installed an old DPT RAID controller in a test machine (5.3-REL, SMP) and saw some odd I/O behavior. The controller is: dpt0: port 0xef80-0xef9f irq 17 at device 16.0 on pci0 dpt0: DPT PM3334UW FW Rev. 07H1, 1 ch

Re: Was: Re: Making a data DVD with 4.10 and dvd+rw-format

2004-12-05 Thread Craig Boston
On Friday 03 December 2004 7:20 am, Stein M. Sandbech wrote: > Yes, I tried that (if my memory doesn't fail me). It seemed to fail on > something > related to the ATAPI device /dev/acd0. If there's nothing else important on the same ATA channel, sometimes an atacontrol detach / attach of the enti

Re: Will there be a 5.3.1?

2004-12-21 Thread Craig Boston
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 05:59:14AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > One problem is that Unix first became popular (outside academia) with > the advent of the 32-bit workstations and then took off with the rise > of Linux on 32-bit i386. Lots of Unix code has never seen an environment > were sizeof(int

Re: fsck: broken file system with background check remains broken after bootup

2005-01-04 Thread Craig Boston
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:59:01PM +1030, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: > This inspires me to ask this question: > > Is it possible to set up FreeBSD to do a clean shutdown upon a pressing > the power button ? i.e. in the same fashion as Solaris does out of the > box. Is this an ATX feature or a kernel

Re: fsck: broken file system with background check remains broken after bootup

2005-01-04 Thread Craig Boston
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 9:57 pm, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: > How can I confirm that ACPI has been setup to do this ? Hmm, well, the easiest thing to check is to run sysctl hw.acpi.power_button_state and see if that sysctl exists and if so, what it's set to (mine is S5, which IIRC is complete po

Re: Vinum Raid5 Init question

2005-01-18 Thread Craig Boston
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:21:59PM +0100, David Elsing wrote: > Quote from the manual of the 4th example of the chapter "HOW TO SET UP VINUM": > "In addition, the volume specification includes the keyword > setupstate, which ensures that all plexes are up after creation." > > But a couple of weeks

Re: Vinum Raid5 Init question

2005-01-18 Thread Craig Boston
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 09:55:25AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > Yes, it could be clearer. Put in a PR. I'm more than willing to submit a patch if it will help, but will it do any good this late in the release cycle? Especially if there will be no 4.12 release. > > Also, if a good disk ge

Re: lirc serial FreeBSD

2007-01-16 Thread Craig Boston
It depends on what type of receiver you have. comms/lirc in ports works adequately for me with a serial IRman. Craig On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 08:18:49PM +0530, krishnamurthy holla wrote: > Dear All, > i have a serial IR receiver and i am looking for lirc support for serial ir > device in freebsd

umass media size off-by-one?

2007-03-05 Thread Craig Boston
Hi all, I ran into this while trying to use geli to encrypt an external usb-2 hard drive. It appears that sometimes the media size reported by umass is one sector too big. For example: umass0: Prolific Technology Inc. Mass Storage Device, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lu

Re: umass media size off-by-one?

2007-03-05 Thread Craig Boston
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 09:37:33PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > Fixed in 7-CURRENT. Contact Warner Losh to make sure that your device > is quirked appropriately. Ah, thanks! I see the commit now. Looks like it should be simple to backport to RELENG_6. Fortunately all 3 of the machines I intend t

Re: pam_group question/proposal

2007-03-29 Thread Craig Boston
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:16:13AM +0400, Taras Savchuk wrote: > I tried to use pam_group to allow accessing imap(dovecot) only for users > in certain group (users/groups stored in AD and checked out via > LDAP/Kerberos), but pam_group is checking applicant's group membership. > I'm sure, that i

Re: Changing Console Resolution - Vidcontrol

2007-04-05 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:25:46AM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > FWIW, most of the time machines boot without _anyone_ > watching anyway. If you need to see the boot messages, > you ssh into the box and type "dmesg -a" or look at the > file /var/run/dmesg.boot (and /var/log/console.log > which can

Re: Changing Console Resolution - Vidcontrol

2007-04-06 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:27:46PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > I think 800x600x4 would be even quicker, because no VESA > calls are required at all for screen output. Oops, I was mistaken. 800x600x4 (MODE_258) is what I'm using. 800x600x8 returns "Operation not supported" when trying to switch

Re: Changing Console Resolution - Vidcontrol

2007-04-07 Thread Craig Boston
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 03:31:40PM +, John Walthall wrote: > No Matter what I try, I get "cannot open raster device, inapropriate ioctl > for this device". I have made sure that I have VESA loaded, etc. This sounds like your kernel is not compiled with "options SC_PIXEL_MODE". Craig

Portsnap with (broken) transparent proxy on 6.2

2007-04-11 Thread Craig Boston
Colin, Normally I would contact you directly (off-list) with this report, however I had tried searching Google for these symptoms and found no resolutions, so I'm copying -stable for archival purposes in case someone runs into a similar problem. I recently decided to try out portsnap on a few mac

Re: FreeBSD vs Region Code DVDs

2007-05-04 Thread Craig Boston
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:03:12AM +0200, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > I don't know the code, but it looks like this Plextor and cd(4) don't > get along when DVD copy protection is involved. I also read in the > OpenBSD 4.1 release notes, that they made changes to their cd(4) to > work better with reg

Re: FreeBSD vs Region Code DVDs

2007-05-04 Thread Craig Boston
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 08:37:30AM -0500, Craig Boston wrote: > Unfortunately I don't know a way other than booting proprietary > operating systems to see what region a drive is set to and/or change it. > Not to say there isn't one, just that I don't know what it is. As

Re: fast rate of major FreeBSD releases to STABLE

2007-05-17 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 10:24:15AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > The recent ports freeze has also concerned me, this is the longest > > ports freeze I have witnessed since I started using FreeBSD years ago > > and its for a desktop element of the os, does it matter if servers > > running FreeBSD

Re: dhclient in 6.0

2006-02-14 Thread Craig Boston
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 10:04:16PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > The problem is that the integration of the modern wlan (802.11) code has > never been done in the if_wi code and it does not report state back to > wlan adequately to make the OpenBSD client function correctly. Well, that's not quite

Re: Fresh install on gmirror'ed disks?

2006-03-03 Thread Craig Boston
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 03:36:17PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote: > What are you talking about? I think its time to brush up on your english > reading and writing skills. It takes much more work, time, and > complexity to 1) boot cd and install os 2) reboot to os and follow a > complex procedure to

gmirror on existing filesystem (was Fresh install on gmirror'ed disks?)

2006-03-16 Thread Craig Boston
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:04:02AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > There's no need to copy files around. gmirror handles it all for you > behind the scenes. Just create the gmirror labels using the existing > disks/slices/partitions, then insert the second set of > disks/slices/parittions. gmirror

Re: [HACKERS] semaphore usage "port based"?

2006-04-04 Thread Craig Boston
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:17:18AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > Perhaps you can hack into the postgresql master a flag that alters > the "1000" parameter, or starts at a port * 1000 + N, then hard-code > that flag into your startup script per jail. A quick and dirty hack to fudge with the reque

Re: splash

2006-04-08 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:53:46AM -0700, Chris wrote: > No kidding? These are the same brands I'm using. The ATI's are PCI > (onboard ATI - TYAN SMP motherboards) and the nVidia's are AGP. They're > "higher end" models as well. Must be the way I build the kernel > regarding boot/ console. Oh well

Re: devfs weirdness with kqemu

2006-04-12 Thread Craig Boston
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 07:09:17PM +0200, Juergen Lock wrote: > Is this something the kld is doing wrong (/usr/ports/emulators/kqemu-kmod) > or is it a devfs problem? The report I got was for 6.0, but it also > happens for me on RELENG_5. This is nothing serious (kqemu works), but > it certainly

Re: 6.0 RELEASE and Volume Managers

2006-05-07 Thread Craig Boston
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:06:00PM +0300, Yousef Raffah wrote: > Why should I define it from the card's BIOS? Is it done through the > system's startup (F9)? IIRC for most of the Compaq RAID controllers you'll need the Smartstart CD that came with the server. A couple of the models I think can be

Re: [PATCH] securelevel and make installworld

2005-04-30 Thread Craig Boston
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:47:08PM -0500, Jon Noack wrote: > The attached diff is against -CURRENT but applies cleanly to 5.4-RC3. > It adds a check to the installworld target in src/Makefile.inc1 to > ensure we are not in secure mode. What about cases where installing in secure mode is both val

Re: gmirror oddities

2005-05-03 Thread Craig Boston
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 11:34:06AM -0700, George Hartzell wrote: > The fix is described in the fourth comment block of Ralf's doc, either > make the slice a sector smaller than the disk device or hardcode the > provider name. I've been using the hardcoding approach, and it seems > to work for me.

Re: gmirror oddities

2005-05-03 Thread Craig Boston
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 02:38:08PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote: > I'm sorry that I don't remember who said it (I'll do some googling and > follow up if I can find the reference), but one time this came up > someone posted a very good idea which IMHO is a good enough soluti

Re: apm in 5.4

2005-05-13 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 05:16:47PM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2005 16:48:36 +0200, Matthias Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >The machine is a Compaq Armada m700, kernel is GENERIC from fresh > >installation; dmesg output is attached. > > Yes, I have apm build into the kernel. D

Re: Recent 5.4-p1 upgrade issue (lib/libc.so.5)

2005-06-01 Thread Craig Boston
Sorry for coming late to the thread -- catching up on mailing list traffic :) On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 10:24:15AM -0700, Jon Passki wrote: > I `chflags noschg /lib/libc.so.5` and then used tar to extract the > exact file. tar was able to unlink the file, and then choked. > After some unrelated er

Re: atacontrol raid1 vs. gmirror

2005-06-13 Thread Craig Boston
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:14:03AM -0700, Jon Simola wrote: > - if they do not probe correctly, check the BIOS settings above > - perform a minimal install of FreeBSD 5.3 (do not worry about > network or anything) > - reboot from the installed OS and login as root > - Run th

Re: Machine Replication

2005-07-21 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:20:34PM -0700, Eli K. Breen wrote: > dd(Slow, not usefull if the hardware isn't identical?) I use dd a lot for this type of thing and don't see how it could possibly be slower than any other method that duplicates the entire raw drive. Make sure to give it a

Re: Jail to jail network performance?

2005-09-26 Thread Craig Boston
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 12:06:39PM -0700, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > Ideally I would like a daemon like socat that can connect/merge two > sockets into one, effectively creating a direct connection and > eliminating a copy. But AFAICT that isn't possible with the current > interface. It depends how

Re: 5.x, 6.x and CPUTYPE

2005-11-07 Thread Craig Boston
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 04:21:56PM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote: > I've noticed that some CPU definitions have changed in /etc/make.conf > between 5 and 6. For good or for bad, I have up until now been building > 5.x for both p3 and p4 architectures with 'i686' but this particular > definition's remova

Re: 5.x, 6.x and CPUTYPE

2005-11-07 Thread Craig Boston
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:05:13PM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote: > Thanks, Craig. I'm glad to hear that I'm not alone in pursuing this method. > Do you know of any particular disadvantages of continuing with this > less-than-optimised model - I guess I mean, is this something that is > likely to break

Re: loader.conf setting ignored

2005-11-10 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:57:56PM -0500, Ben Kelly wrote: > So it turns out you can set kern.geom.debugflags from loader.conf. The > gvinum mirror problem I was trying to debug was causing the problem. > Edits to loader.conf were only being written to the second disk, but the > loader was read

Re: loader.conf setting ignored

2005-11-10 Thread Craig Boston
Oh, ignore me I just read the thread from beginning and saw that you already thought of that and didn't have console access :-/ Craig ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe,

Toshiba Satellite L25 (how to run FreeBSD 6.0 on)

2005-11-25 Thread Craig Boston
Sorry for the cross post, but there doesn't seem to be much traffic on -mobile so I don't know how many people are reading it. Please respect reply-to freebsd-mobile@ and keep any discussion there and off of stable. I picked up one of these laptops early this morning at the Best Buy black friday

Re: HEADS UP: Release schedule for 2006

2005-12-16 Thread Craig Boston
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 09:20:44PM +0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > + Features2=0x180 > > Q: What are those extra features and are they useful? ;-) Enhanced Speedstep and Thermal Management. They're useful if you want to use powerd to conserve power / reduce heat generation. (load the cpufreq dri

Re: Gmirror'd SWAP: no dump?

2006-01-19 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 02:53:42PM +, Thomas Hurst wrote: > > IIRC I had the problem that 'gmirror insert' without '-h' not always > > inserted the slice specified by the entire block device (e.g. > > /dev/ad4s1 vs. /dev/ad4). Apparently there is some auto detection > > code and/or gmirror cann

Re: status of ATA subsystem

2002-04-01 Thread Craig Boston
> This is true. However, stability is an issue AND I also want the newer > things in -STABLE, like sendmail 8.12 (ducks), and even Soren's ATA > based cdrecord so I can finally burn CDs on my arbitrary CDRW drive > here. You want stability *AND* bleeding edge features? How about a potion of immo

Re: XFree86 faster!?

2002-06-27 Thread Craig Boston
Oliver Fromme wrote: > First of all -- yes, I noticed the sarcasm. > > While the speed improvement that Johannes experienced is > certainly desirable and should not be reversed, it _is_ > somewhat important to find out what caused it. Because > if the cause is unknown, then it could disappear on

Re: Help needed debugging hard lock (SMP-related)

2002-11-28 Thread Craig Boston
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 12:07, Craig Boston wrote: > (kgdb) print pidhashtbl[73508 & pidhash].lh_first->p_pid > $21 = 73508 Argh! I must be losing my mind or something. I swear there really WAS text above this before I hit send :) Anyway, it SHOULD have read something like the follo

Re: ipfilter / ipnat quandry

2002-12-17 Thread Craig Boston
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 13:02, Clifton Royston wrote: > ipf does have the ability to more correctly simulate a closed port. > I did a similar exercise on my personal OpenBSD firewall box earlier > this year; I won't go through your whole ruleset, but basically for > every TCP port you block, you

Weird messages

2003-03-28 Thread Craig Boston
Okay, is there something wrong with the mailing list, my mail server, or am I just going insane? Seeming random messages (from completely different people) are showing up as mutipart/mixed, with an empty application/pgp-signature part and and a text/plain part containing only the following: On Fr

Re: kern/55094: Intel USB 2.0 unrecognized (partial patch provided)

2003-07-31 Thread Craig Boston
Sorry for the self-reply -- I forgot to mention that though the original question was about stable, the patch is against 5.1 release. I'm not sure if ehci has been backported to stable or not (it wasn't in 4.8-RELEASE at least). Craig ___ [EMAIL PRO