Re: Hardware

2010-10-15 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:02:59PM -0300, M?rcio Luciano Donada wrote: > Hi, > We buy some hardware, new, but came with processors exchanged below what > we ask. However, the manufacturing of hardware, informed us that we > could install everything and then just replace the processor. how will I >

Re: kpanic on install >32GB of RAM

2010-10-16 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:52:00PM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:38 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 09:30 -0700, Boris Kochergin wrote: > > > On 10/15/10 12:27, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:04:53AM -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > >

Re: machine hangs on occasion - correlated with ssh break-in attempts

2008-08-21 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Rink Springer wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:03:09PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > Finally, consider moving to pf instead, if you really feel ipfw is > > what's causing your machine to crash. You might be pleasantly surprised > > by the syntax, an

Re: Fwd: FreeBSD 7.1 Content

2008-09-08 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 08:06:24AM -0400, Randy Pratt wrote: > The ports tree distribution tarball provided on the installation disks > is another area that needs some consideration. I suspect that many > people aren't aware of the need for "adoption": > > http://myfreebsd.homeunix.net/hints_n_

Re: dhclient doing DISCOVER with bad IP checksum - bge

2008-12-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 12:27:58AM -0800, Jonathan Feally wrote: > Sorry for the cross-post, but this could be either lists problem. > > I have 2 boxes running 7-STABLE as of 20081130, both i386 SMP. One is > running ISC DHCPD 3.0.x from recent ports, and the other dhclient from make > world. >

Re: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

2009-01-05 Thread Brooks Davis
[This question would be better to ask on the freebsd-questions list, but see below.] On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:41:40AM -0700, Brian Duke wrote: > Hello List, > I'm trying to upgrade my system from 6_2 to 7_1 and cannot seem to do it. > Perhaps I'm missing something. Here is the basic procedure I'

Re: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

2009-01-05 Thread Brooks Davis
OK, now I feel like an idiot, I completely misread the middle of your e-mail. You might still want to check out freebsd-update since it's a lot quicker than rebuilding, but that's not your issue here. On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 01:35:55PM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: > [This question wo

Re: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

2009-01-05 Thread Brooks Davis
cedure I'm > >following. > >> > >>#cp > /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile /root/stand_sup > > > >>#vi > /root/stand_sup > >><< >>>>>host=cvsup15.us.FreeBSD. > > >org > >><< &g

Re: FreeBSD6.2 to 7.1 Remote update

2009-01-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 12:52:32AM +0300, l1nyx...@googlemail.com wrote: > , FreeBSD-stable. > > It's real? > I have one server with hard to access physically. > > Can I update him to new release over ssh only? It's quite possible if you're careful, but there are plenty of ways to do

Re: cvsup freebsd 6_2 to freebsd 7_1 not upgrading?

2009-01-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:31:48AM -0700, Brian Duke wrote: > This is very odd. > I got desperate last night and steeled myself for a reinstall. Copied all > the known keeper files to an alternate drive including /home, /etc, > /usr/local/etc and a couple others. It's on a completely separate drive

Re: dhclient cant renew lease.

2009-02-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:40:15PM +0100, Peter Ankerst?l wrote: > Hi > Im running FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE on my gateway and for the last week or so it > cant renew its dhcp-lease. > > At boot-time it sends a request to broadcast: DHCPREQUEST on fxp0 to > 255.255.255.255 port 67 > And then it gets a

Re: dhclient starts after NETWORK

2009-12-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:03:39PM +0300, al...@ulgsm.ru wrote: > > Wrong order in /etc/rc.d scripts > > ~]>rcorder /etc/rc.d/* | grep -n -e dhclient -e ntp > 66:/etc/rc.d/ntpdate > 112:/etc/rc.d/ntpd > 139:/etc/rc.d/dhclient > > Then ifconfig_rl0="DHCP"? ntpdate can`t sync time. > > > It is r

Re: dhclient starts after NETWORK

2009-12-08 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 04:04:20PM +0300, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:02:26 +0100 > "Ronald Klop" wrote: > > > Does ifconfig_rl0="SYNCDHCP" help? > > synchronous_dhclient="YES" > > helps for me, ntpdate syncs after I changed rc.conf with it. Hmm, this sound

Re: booting off GPT partitions

2010-01-27 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:45:36PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote: > Hey > > I was under the impression that everyone and their dog is using GPT > partitioning in FreeBSD these days, including for boot drives and that > I was just being unlucky with my current NAS motherboard (Intel > D945GCLF2) having s

Re: booting off GPT partitions

2010-01-27 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:27:54AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2010-01-27 22:27, John Baldwin wrote: >> GPT was defined along with EFI, so many folks assume that you have to use EFI >> to boot a GPT-labelled disk. However, FreeBSD has its own BIOS-based >> bootstrap that can handle GPT-label

Re: install root certificates

2010-02-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:59:31PM -0500, Xian Chen wrote: > Hello, > > I use 8.0 Release on my thinkpad T42 laptop and want to connect to the WIFI > AP near me. The AP is encrypted by WPA2. I also need some root > certifications installed ( UTN-USERFirst-Hardware ). I install > /usr/ports/securi

Re: Q&A on textdumps (fwd)

2008-04-03 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:57:06PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > > Dear all, > > I've now completed the MFC of basic textdump support to 7.0. Once I've had > a chance to ping Brooks about it, either he or I will MFC support for > ddb.conf, which allows configuring textdump and debugging script

Re: Two DHCP servers

2008-04-22 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 02:09:06PM +0200, Szemer?dy G?bor wrote: > Hello! > We have a DHCP server listening on subnet 192.168.42.0. (On the server with > address 192.168.42.1) > One of the addresses , lets say 192.168.42.11 , we plan to use as a LTSP > server for thin clients. > So we installed t

Re: 6.3 stability and freebsd-update (was: Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3)

2008-06-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:34:01AM -0800, Royce Williams wrote: > >> On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote: > >> > >>> Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from > >>> people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average > >>> more stable than 6.2.

Re: dhclient and resolv.conf.sav

2008-07-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:52:35AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hello, > > we have been bitten by something that obvoiusly > is a feature, not a bug, but I do not quite understand > the intentions and reasoning behind it. > > I have a host with manual interface and resolver configuration > a

Re: dhclient and resolv.conf.sav

2008-07-11 Thread Brooks Davis
cked it up from openbsd when we took their client (which is derived from an early ISC client). If it's not in the stock isc dhclient-script adding it would be trivial. -- Brooks > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:57:41AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 10:52:35AM +

Re: infrastructure

2008-07-28 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:27:37AM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > How do I get in touch with FreeBSD infrastructure people about mailing list > set up? Sorry to post here, but I've scoured the web site and cannot find > anything more appropriate. Is there a [EMAIL PROTECTED] or > something s

Re: Why not provide libclang.so in base?

2012-07-26 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 09:31:04AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-07-18 14:54, Yanhui Shen wrote: > > I'm using clang-complete plugin in vim, > > it claims with libclang.so instead of bin/clang it works better. > > > > However libclang.so is not installed by a default "make buildworld && m

Re: What is "negative group permissions"? (Re: narawntapu security run output)

2013-01-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 03:27:57PM +, jb wrote: > Mikhail T. aldan.algebra.com> writes: > > > > > On 23.12.2012 11:48, Chris Rees wrote: > > > They involve a lot of thought to get right, as well as chmod g-w on > > > something where you probably meant chmod go-w is a disastrous but > > > (

Re: CLANG 3.2 breaks security/pam_ssh_agent_auth on stable/9

2013-01-16 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:01:00PM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > On 2013-01-16 13:05, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > >> > >> I just updated my stable/9 system after clang3.2 was added. My system > >> is amd64, both world and kernel are compiled

Re: CLANG 3.2 breaks security/pam_ssh_agent_auth on stable/9

2013-01-17 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:06:27AM +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > >> On 2013-01-16 13:05, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > >>> > >>> I just updated my stable/9 system after clang3.2 was adde

[RFC] possible non-backward-compatible change to install(1)

2013-01-29 Thread Brooks Davis
In CURRENT I have added a number of features to the install(1) command that are derived from NetBSD. One of them is the -M option that causes new-style mtree entries to be emitted for each object that is created in the target. In the interest of compatibility and usability I removed the previous

Re: CLANG 3.2 breaks security/pam_ssh_agent_auth on stable/9

2013-02-01 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:22:44PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 09:15:02AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: > > Not unless you consider adding new functions in a reserved namespace > > (str*) to be ABI breakage. > > Well, what often happens is that when

Re: make buildkernel for GENERIC 9-STABLE just hangs, no error

2013-04-17 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Olav Gr?n?s Gjerde wrote: > I have a weird problem while building the GENERIC 9-STABLE kernel. After > around 5 minutes of compile time, the process just hangs on same place. No > error. I've tried compiling different commits from this week with the same >

Re: make buildkernel for GENERIC 9-STABLE just hangs, no error

2013-04-17 Thread Brooks Davis
Brooks > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Olav Gr?n?s Gjerde wrote: > > > I have a weird problem while building the GENERIC 9-STABLE kernel. After > > > around 5 minutes of compile time, the

Re: make buildkernel for GENERIC 9-STABLE just hangs, no error

2013-04-17 Thread Brooks Davis
ith > my results. > > Kind regards, > Olav > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 08:57:22PM +0200, Olav Gr?n?s Gjerde wrote: > > > It was(sorry) from around 12th June 2012. > > > But I have another sy

Re: include/c++/v1 still in BSD.include.dist as well as in obsolete_files

2013-06-18 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:22:55PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On Jun 18, 2013, at 21:03, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > When I run "make check-old, the /usr/include/c++/v1 and v1/ext directories > > are listed as old, but they are still present in BSD.include.dist, so are > > recreated every time I

Re: buildworld without libncursesw

2015-03-03 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:20:57PM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Is there a preferred way to buildworld without libncursesw? > > When I add to /etc/src.conf > WITHOUT_NCURSESW=yes > > I find that a buildworld fails due to missing libncursesw.*. > So what uses libncurses? These guys do > /usr/

Re: buildworld without libncursesw

2015-03-04 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:47:44AM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > > On 4/03/2015 8:13 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:20:57PM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > >> Is there a preferred way to buildworld without libncursesw? > >> &g

Re: MFC r282973 (disable libgomp build) and r283060 (disable libgcov build)?

2015-07-24 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 02:15:28PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > On 24 Jul, Matthieu Volat wrote: > > I'm not fond of lang/gcc as openmp "provider": if a port use c++, it > > will cause linkage headaches with libc++ (I never was able to have > > graphics/darktable working, for example). > > You might

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, smc, > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this thread, and > > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today. > > vr

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:06:48PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, > > > > smc, > > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this th

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-23 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes < > > freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-24 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 06:54:01AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence > > > of a comma > > > > If we are now going to evaluate all proposed changes to FreeBS

Re: "sockstat: struct xinpgen size mismatch" in 11.2-p4 jail on 12-STABLE host

2018-11-26 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 09:17:23AM -0500, Paul Mather wrote: > I updated a system yesterday to the latest 12-STABLE as part of the upcoming > 12-RELEASE cycle. I've installed several BETA and at least one RC of 12 > since updating from 11-STABLE as part of the 12 cycle and have had no > problem

Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-18:15.loader

2018-11-27 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:32:54AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 28.11.2018 4:22, FreeBSD Errata Notices wrote: > > > Affects:All supported versions of FreeBSD. > > Corrected: 2018-10-24 23:17:17 UTC (stable/11, 11.2-STABLE) > > 2018-11-27 19:45:25 UTC (releng/11.2,

Re: SCSI and dmesg

2018-11-29 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 11:01:01AM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:49 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 8:09 AM Alan Somers wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:57 PM Warner Losh wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:32 PM Maxim Sobole

Re: Address Collision using i386 4G/4G Memory Split

2018-12-18 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:58:05PM -0500, Kurt Lidl wrote: > Alexander Lochmann writes: > > According to git commit e3089a (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1463) > > FreeBSD 12.0 i386 uses separate address spaces for kernel and user > > space. So basically two memory areas, one in each space, can have

Reminder: FCP-101: pending removal of some 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2019-01-31 Thread Brooks Davis
We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100 Ethernet drivers in the March/April timeframe: ae, bm, cs, de, dme, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe All of these drivers generate warnings in FreeBSD 12 and to the best of my knowledge, none have cleared th

Re: Reminder: FCP-101: pending removal of some 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2019-02-01 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 04:00:50AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:43:44PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100 > > > Ethernet drivers in the March/April timeframe: > > &g

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-29 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:09AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > > [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropriate here, in > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dear colleagues, > > any hints to tune rrdtool with ~30k rrd files (approx 2k target devices)? > > machine is mostly IO-boun

Re: rrdtool performance tuning (fwd)

2007-10-30 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:32:42PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Brooks Davis wrote: > > BD> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:13:09AM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > BD> > > BD> > [hmm, after thinking a bit I decided it would be more appropria

Re: CVS tag for 7.0 - standard

2007-10-31 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:18:26AM -0600, JD Bronson wrote: > Can someone kindly tell me the CVS tag to follow the 7.0 patch branch > (only)? > > I am running 7.0Beta1 and want to stay with that only. Nothing newer like > the 'stable' branch. > > It seems that the tag I am using is 7.0-stable?

Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?

2009-06-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 03:51:25PM -0500, David Kelly wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Ruben van Staveren wrote: > > > > On 2 Jun 2009, at 21:20, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > >Up till Sunday in 8-current, and for a long time in general > > >network.subr (part of the rc.d system) h

Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?

2009-06-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:30:46PM +0200, Ruben van Staveren wrote: > > On 2 Jun 2009, at 21:20, Doug Barton wrote: > >> Up till Sunday in 8-current, and for a long time in general >> network.subr (part of the rc.d system) has emitted a warning that >> values of network_interfaces other than AUTO

Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?

2009-06-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 07:22:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > > To repeat what I wrote earlier today on another list there's no need > > to worry about hot plugged or newly added interfaces getting magically > > configured to do dhcp or anything else[0]. > > such as detected by services such as bi

Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?

2009-06-03 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 06:06:48PM -0500, Erik Osterholm wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 12:20:34PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > Up till Sunday in 8-current, and for a long time in general > > network.subr (part of the rc.d system) has emitted a warning that > > values of network_interfaces other

Re: Do you use a value other than AUTO for network_interfaces?

2009-06-03 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 06:18:01PM +0200, Angelo Turetta wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> If you use a value of network_interfaces other than AUTO please speak >> up so that we can make an intelligent decision about this issue. > > Maybe I am wrong, setting network_interfaces is the way I found I ha

Re: ZFS: drive replacement performance

2009-07-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:56:14PM -0700, Mahlon E. Smith wrote: > > I've got a 9 sata drive raidz1 array, started at version 6, upgraded to > version 13. I had an apparent drive failure, and then at some point, a > kernel panic (unrelated to ZFS.) The reboot caused the device numbers > to shuff

Re: ZFS: drive replacement performance

2009-07-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:40:02AM +0300, Dan Naumov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Mahlon E. Smith wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009, Freddie Cash wrote: > >> > > >> > This is why we've started using glabel(8) to label our drive

Re: ZFS: drive replacement performance

2009-07-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:32:12AM +1000, Andrew Snow wrote: > Mahlon E. Smith wrote: > >> Strangely, the ETA is jumping all over the place, from 50 hours to 2000+ >> hours. Never seen the percent complete over 0.01% done, but then it >> goes back to 0.00%. > > Are you taking snapshots from cron

Re: ZFS: drive replacement performance

2009-07-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:53:17AM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:53:58PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > I'm seeing essentially the same think on an 8.0-BETA1 box with an 8-disk > > raidz1 pool. Every once in a while the system makes it to 0.05%

Re: ue0 dhclient FBSD8-BETA2

2009-07-22 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 02:05:43PM -0500, Paul A. Procacci wrote: > Gents, > > Since the name changed for my cdce device, booting up the OS fails to > obtain an address via dhcp on this interface. dhclient works normally > after the machine is booted and I provide the command on the command lin

Re: ifconfig_ed0="DHCP" does not work on 8.0-BETA3

2009-09-04 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 02:41:48PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:38:11PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have a machine with the following ethernet PCI card: > > > > ed0: port 0xdc00-0xdc1f irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 > > ed0: WARNING: using obsolet

Re: ifconfig_ed0="DHCP" does not work on 8.0-BETA3

2009-09-09 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 01:06:35PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le Ven 4 sep 09 ? 23:57:47 +0200, Brooks Davis > ?crivait?: > > > This is a know issue with some devices supported by ed(4). You can work > > around it by changing DHCP to SYNCDHCP which will cause dhclien

Re: ifconfig_ed0="DHCP" does not work on 8.0-BETA3

2009-09-09 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le Mer 9 sep 09 ? 17:52:57 +0200, Brooks Davis > ?crivait?: > > > I'd rather not mention the "link state changed" message since I'd love > > to see it go away. How's this? &g

Re: svn commit: r197065 - in stable/8: etc/defaults lib/libc/stdlib sys/amd64/conf sys/i386/conf sys/ia64/conf sys/pc98/conf sys/powerpc/conf sys/sparc64/conf

2009-09-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 05:36:56PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > 2009/9/10 Ken Smith : > > On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 15:29 +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > > >> This seems like a step backwards to me: crash dumps have been left > >> enabled in 7.x and have proved very useful from the point of view of > >>

Re: Base system's Heimdal with Openldap support?

2009-09-25 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 04:45:05PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Peter C. Lai wrote: > > What happens when you portupgrade? You will have to deal with rebuilding > > that part of world? > > Not unless the shared library version number changes, that's the > beauty of shared libraries. Unfortunatly w

Re: Newer clang than comes with install?

2016-03-04 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: > I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1". But there are > bugs in this version of clang that I'm having trouble with. > > Is compiling a newer (say, 3.7.1) version of clang to target FreeBSD > supported? I have n

Re: Newer clang than comes with install?

2016-03-07 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:53:08AM -0500, Kevin P. Neal wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 02:22:26PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 08:45:05AM -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: > > > I notice on 10.2 we're using "FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1".

Re: Benchmarks results for Compilers on FreeBSD 11

2016-08-31 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 12:16:16PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > On Wednesday, August 31, 2016, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > I'll demur just a bit on your points. > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:51:02PM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > > > "we need a compiler to build the system" (a prebuilt package does that >

Calling ATM NIC users: en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), patm(4)

2017-02-17 Thread Brooks Davis
Our current ATM stack supports a small number of NICs that were current in the late 90s[0]. None of them have been manufactured in a long time and while you can buy hatm(4) devices on e-bay, it's increasingly difficult to find a motherboard that will accept them. I'd like to propose removing supp

Re: Calling ATM NIC users: en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), patm(4)

2017-02-21 Thread Brooks Davis
ge- > From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On > Behalf Of Brooks Davis > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 2:33 AM > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-...@freebsd.org > Subject: Calling ATM NIC users: en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), patm(4) > >

Impending NATM removal

2017-04-06 Thread Brooks Davis
As previously threatened, I plan to remove NATM support next week. This includes the drivers en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), and patm(4). None of these devices have been manufactured in the last 20 years so it is time to move on. The planned commit can be seen at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9883 -- B

Re: i386 with 4GB RAM: less than 2GB available on A2SAV (Intel Atom E3940)

2018-01-30 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:09:44AM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:11 AM, Andre Albsmeier < > andre.albsme...@siemens.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 28-Jan-2018 at 10:32:44 -0600, Mike Karels wrote: > > > > On 28 Jan 2018, at 15:57, Andre Albsmeier > > = > > > > wrote: > > > > >

Calling nxge(4) users

2018-03-25 Thread Brooks Davis
The nxge(4) driver for the Neterion Xframe-I and Xframe-II 10GbE adapters has obvious bugs (by inspection) and it doesn't appear the company exists any more. We'd like to see if there are any significant users of this device and plan to remove it from FreeBSD-12 if not. -- Brooks signature.asc

Re: Calling nxge(4) users

2018-03-26 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 01:09:27PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > The nxge(4) driver for the Neterion Xframe-I and Xframe-II 10GbE > > adapters has obvious bugs (by inspection) and it doesn't appear the > > company exists any more. We'd like to see if there are any significant > > users of thi

Re: svn commit: r332493 - stable/11/sys/net

2018-04-15 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 08:54:15AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote: > On 14 April 2018 at 07:31, Magnus Ringman wrote: > > Hi Brooks, this MFC missed your r331077 > > (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14706) thus stable buildkernel currently > > breaks on missing those two macros. > > Thanks for identifying th

FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-03 Thread Brooks Davis
list. The full FCP-0101 is included below. -- Brooks --- authors: Brooks Davis state: feedback --- # FCP 101: Deprecation and removal of 10/100 Ethernet drivers Deprecate most 10 and 10/100Mbps Ethernet drivers and remove them before FreeBSD 13. ## Problem Statement Each network driver create

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-04 Thread Brooks Davis
s a person who has edited every driver in the tree multiple times in the last year (mostly in an external tree), I will consider this process successful even if we keep the majority of listed drivers in the tree. On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:05:16PM +, Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> Pl

Re: FCP-0101: Deprecating most 10/100 Ethernet drivers

2018-10-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:22PM +0100, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > Remember, it's not simply deprecating cards less than 1Gig. > > I have a card that is 10/100 only, but works fine with the gigabit alc driver: > > alc0: port 0x2000-0x207f mem > 0xe050-0xe053 irq 16 at device 0.0 on p

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > I normally run the command > # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< > before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This time I > got the following output: > > diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> I normally run the command > >> # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< > >> before running 'portupgrade -

Re: pkg_version confused by architecutre in package name

2006-07-06 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > > Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:

Re: em device hangs on ifconfig alias ...

2006-07-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 05:55:23PM -0300, User Freebsd wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > >Mornin'! > > > >On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:11:36AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > > >>>Not sure what STP is > >> > >>Spanning Tree Protocol. Having the link go up and down would cause

Re: interface announcement MFC

2006-07-24 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006 at 10:33:06PM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > I would quite like to MFC the autobridge feature but it depends on this > change, http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2006-May/064529.html > > I cant see it being a problem MFCing this to stable as the existing devd > anno

Re: "scan stuck" with if_iwi(4)

2006-08-01 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 04:47:16PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: > Andrew Thompson wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:28:12PM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote: > >> Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > >>> Oh? Sounds interesting, where can I find these patches? > >> The work has always been in perforce.freebsd.org

Re: gzip is faster with -O3

2006-08-09 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:31:58PM -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 8/9/06, Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >1. gzip isn't usually used to compress incompressible data. > > > >2. use "time" to figure out how much CPU time it actually burns. > > 5 GB are somewhat I/O bound, but

Re: Default route (IPv4) demolished by destroying clone (gif/gre) interface

2006-08-16 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > > Ouch. Don't ppp(8), OpenVPN etc. destroy the tun interface they're > using when they exit? Flushing all routes then would be rather > harmful. I'm glad I haven't updated to a newer -stable yet then :-) In general, no since t

Re: Default route (IPv4) demolished by destroying clone (gif/gre) interface

2006-08-16 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:23:13AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > > > > > > Ouch. Don't ppp(8), OpenVPN etc. destroy the tun interface

Re: Default route (IPv4) demolished by destroying clone (gif/gre) interface

2006-08-16 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:49:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > >

Re: Default route (IPv4) demolished by destroying clone (gif/gre) interface

2006-08-16 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:49:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 07:58:44PM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:54:19AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > >

Re: Default route (IPv4) demolished by destroying clone (gif/gre) interface

2006-08-17 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 11:16:51AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:59:13PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 08:49:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 12:15:25PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > > >

Re: The need for initialising disks before use?

2006-08-17 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:35:14AM -1000, Antony Mawer wrote: > Hi list, > > A quick question - is it recommended to initialise disks before using > them to allow the disks to map out any "bad spots" early on? I've seen > some "uninitialised" disks (ie. new disks, thrown into a machine, > newfs

Re: The need for initialising disks before use?

2006-08-18 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:19:04AM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Thursday 17 August 2006 8:35 am, Antony Mawer wrote: > > > A quick question - is it recommended to initialise disks before using > > them to allow the disks to map out any "bad spots" early on? > > Note: if you once you actually

Re: The need for initialising disks before use?

2006-08-18 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 01:41:27PM -1000, Antony Mawer wrote: > On 18/08/2006 4:29 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:19:04AM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote: > >>On Thursday 17 August 2006 8:35 am, Antony Mawer wrote: > >> > >>>A quick que

Re: cron abuse

2006-09-03 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 11:57:44AM -0500, Don Wilde wrote: > On 9/3/06, David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 11:43:01AM -0500, Don Wilde wrote: > >> ... > >> Thanks for taking the time to answer, David. > > > >Sure thing. > > > >> Yes, I see that. I'm reinstalling t

Re: Still possible to directly boot without loader?

2006-09-11 Thread Brooks Davis
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:10:26PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > I just tried to load my standard kernel from the boot blocks (instead > of using loader(8)), but I either get a hang before the kernel prints > anything, or a BTX halted. Is this still supposed to work in 6- > stable, or has it

Re: optimization levels for 6-STABLE build{kernel,world}

2006-09-12 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:22:51PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > What are ppl currently using for CFLAGS/COPTFLAGS in /etc/make.conf for > building kernel/world? I know awhile back it wasn't recommended to go > above -O2, for instance, but suspect that has changed ... ? Nothing above -O2

Re: sed and comma-delimited file

2006-09-19 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:26:54PM -0400, SigmaX asdf wrote: > Yo; > > I have a series of comma-delimited text files with fourteen columns of > data and several hundred rows. I want to use a short shell script to > strip them of the last 9 columns, leaving the same file but with just > five of it

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

2006-09-27 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 05:28:24PM +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 03:16:57AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > > Well, the best I can say at the moment is, "Wow." =-( I guess the > > thing to do here is to figure out if the problem lies with the em > > inter

Re: 6.2 SHOWSTOPPER - em completely unusable on 6.2

2006-09-27 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:32:16AM +1200, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 03:25:55PM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 02:42:30PM +0200, Philippe Pegon wrote: > > > > > it's just a me too. On our ftp server (ftp8.fr.freebsd.org), sometimes > >

Re: Drives always come up dirty after shutdown on 6.2-PRERELEASE.

2006-09-29 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > Hey guys, > > I'm not really on the ball with reading the lists now-a-days, and so > I've not idea whether this has been discussed already. > > On my laptop running 6.2-PRERELEASE the drives always mount dirty, which > suggests t

Re: Drives always come up dirty after shutdown on 6.2-PRERELEASE.

2006-10-02 Thread Brooks Davis
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:10:10PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 09:44:07AM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:16:12PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > I'm not really on the ball

Re: Recommendations for a serial port card you can actually BUY?

2006-10-05 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:21:44PM -0500, Karl Denninger wrote: > > FreeBSD's USB support has always been somewhat deficient. For example, > apcupsd can't talk to their UPSs over the USB bus, even though the software > itself knows how, because FreeBSD doesn't know what a UPS is and throws up > i

  1   2   3   >