On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 04:08:55PM -0800, alan bryan wrote:
>
>
> --- On Fri, 2/12/10, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> > From: Rick Macklem
> > Subject: Re: NFS write corruption on 8.0-RELEASE
> > To: "Dmitry Marakasov"
> > Cc: freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, "John Baldwin"
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:46:42PM -, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Max Laier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Steven Hartland wrote:
>
> >>So two questions:-
> >>1. Can usb support be disabled from the loader?
> >>2. Anyone got any ideas why
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 12:15:32AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> I have just sent more information to the PR at
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=157397
>
> The short summary (more info in the PR) is:
>
> - limiting tags to 31 does not help
>
> - disabling NCQ appears to help in ini
On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 05:05:25PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Does anyone use ZFS with a 32-bit kernel, that is also not i386 ?
> If you do, could you please let me know? Along with uname -rmp output.
> Thank you!
[51]wb1# uname -rmp
12.0-RELEASE arm armv7
It is a wandboard qaud with iMX6 a
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:39:23AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:23:58AM + I heard the voice of
> Alex Zbyslaw, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > Of course, with modern systems where nroff-ing a man page takes
> > negligible time and system resources, it could also
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:30:45PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 08:08:31PM +0100 I heard the voice of
> Bernd Walter, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > I don't completly agree.
> > Many people forget that FreeBSD is used on slow embedded sys
System ist running ZFS data pool on 12 disk JBOD using
MegaRAID SAS 9361-4i controller.
After some time it starts printing the following errors:
Oct 16 22:26:46 hostname kernel: mfi0: I/O error, cmd=0xfe0001079c90,
status=0x3c, scsi_status=0
Oct 16 22:26:46 hostname kernel: mfi0: sense error
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:28:53PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> [test_check() between the fork and the wait/sleep prevents the
> failure from occurring. Even a small access to the memory at
> that stage prevents the failure. Details follow.]
Maybe a stupid question, since you might have written it
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 11:31:53AM +1300, Marcos Biscaysaqu wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> We have a very interesting Embebed FreeBSD base system using
> Netgraph, BGP, Voip over IP (SER and Asterisk), PF, Remote Desktop Client
> (netboot), VLANs, Q-in-Q Vlan, VPN, L2tp, pptp, Xmail, Dhcp serv
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:54:51PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 12:38, Ed Schouten wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > * Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 1/15/07, Hans Petter Selasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >No. What happens when you use/load "um
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:03:25AM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> ##
>
>
> I tried the same with an other nfs server (using dill as nfs server this
> time - system description is in my 1st mail, same mount options like /
> mnt/files). And guess what? dill rebooted immediate... dd came never
>
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 12:45:50PM +0200, Sten Spans wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2005, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> >On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:03:25AM +0200, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> >>##
> >>
> >>
> >>I tried the same with an other nfs server
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Sten Spans wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2005, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> >>>
> >>>This is absolutely known - TCP/nfs has bugs in realigning packets.
> >>>Don't use TCP on strong aligned architectures.
> >&
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 09:18:01AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
> On a -stable system from October 31, I'm seeing this from sockstat:
>
> Userland and kernel are in sync. This is on an Alpha, though I
> don't know whether that's significant or not. Is anybody else
> seeing this problem?
It does
14 matches
Mail list logo
