On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi everyone,
following the announcement of Pawel Jakub Dawidek (p...@freebsd.org) I am
providing a ZFSv28 testing patch for 8-STABLE.
Link to the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101215.patch.xz
I've got an I
On 01/09/2011 10:00 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi everyone,
following the announcement of Pawel Jakub Dawidek (p...@freebsd.org) I am
providing a ZFSv28 testing patch for 8-STABLE.
Link to the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28
On 01/01/2011 08:09 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
What I see:
- increased CPU load
- decreased L2 ARC hit rate, decreased SSD (ad[46]), therefore increased
hard disk load (IOPS graph)
...
Any ideas on what could cause these? I haven&#
On 01/09/2011 01:18 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 12:49:27PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 01/09/2011 10:00 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi everyone,
following the announcement of Pawel Jakub Dawidek (p...@freebsd.org) I am
On 01/10/2011 10:02 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 12:49:27PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
No, it's not related. One of the disks in the RAIDZ2 pool went bad:
(da4:arcmsr0:0:4:0): READ(6). CDB: 8 0 2 10 10 0
(da4:arcmsr0:0:4:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error
(da4:arcm
On 01/10/2011 09:57 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 12:52:56PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
[...]
I've finally found the time to read the v28 patch and figured out the
problem: vfs.zfs.l2arc_noprefetch was changed to 1, so it doesn't use
the prefetched data on
On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Hi everyone,
following the announcement of Pawel Jakub Dawidek (p...@freebsd.org) I am
providing a ZFSv28 testing patch for 8-STABLE.
Link to the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101215.patch.xz
Link to mfsBS
Hi,
I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB eg.),
but now it happens on 4G machines too:
tmpfs 0B 0B 0B 100%
/tmp
FreeBSD builder 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Jan 8
22:11:54 CET 2011
Maybe it's rel
On 01/19/11 09:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB
eg.), but now it happens on 4G machines too:
tmpfs 0B 0B 0B
100%/tmp
FreeBSD
On 01/30/11 12:09, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 05:27:38PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 19 January 2011 16:02, Kostik Belousov wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~ivoras/diffs/tmpfs.h.patch
I don't think this is a complete solution but it's a start. If you can,
try it and see
On 02/10/2011 05:56 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 11:09:31 +0100
Attila Nagy wrote:
On 01/19/11 09:46, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:37:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
I first noticed this problem on machines with more memory (32GB
eg.), but now it happens on
Hi,
I've just upgraded a 8-STABLE box to 9-STABLE (well, just few commits
before it has been tagged as STABLE), which runs from NFS (pxebooted).
It has some IPSec config in ipsec.conf, like this for several boxes:
add 172.28.16.4 172.16.248.2 ah 15704 -A hmac-md5 "asdfgh";
add 17
Hi,
On 01/04/12 15:51, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
I've just upgraded a 8-STABLE box to 9-STABLE (well, just few commits
before it has been tagged as STABLE), which runs from NFS (pxebooted).
It has some IPSec config in ipsec.conf, like this for several boxes:
add 172.28.16.4 172.16
On 01/04/12 17:31, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
[]
#7 0x809bf779 in ipsec_process_done (m=0xfe000c7c7a00,
isr=0xfe001bf54380) at
/data/usr/src/sys/netipsec/ipsec_output.c:170
Here seems to be the
On 01/05/12 11:37, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
Strange. may be related to some kind of code optimization
As the line juste before is:
saidx =&sav->sah->saidx;
Could you show the value of&sav->sah->saidx ?
And also check if kgdb can print sav->sah->saidx (without the&) ?
Oh sorry, the previ
Hi,
I get this on a recent stable/9 system with uhci support removed from
the kernel config:
da0 at ciss0 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device
da0: 135.168MB/s transfers
da0: Command Queueing enabled
da0: 286070MB (585871964 512 byte sectors: 255H 32S/T 65535C)
cd
On 02/23/12 05:15, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
bge0: mem
0xf6bf-0xf6bf,0xf6be-0xf6be,0xf6bd-0xf6bd irq 32
at device 0.0 on pci3
bge0: CHIP ID 0x05719001; ASIC REV 0x5719; CHIP REV 0x57190; PCI-E
^^
This controller is new one. Probably BCM5719 A1 but no
On 02/23/12 21:44, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
I have to ask more information for the controller to Broadcom.
Not sure whether I can get some hint at this moment though. :-(
Is there anything I can do? I ask this because I have to give back this
server very soon.
Given that you also have USB related
On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Link to the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101215.patch.xz
I've used this:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101223-nopython.patch.xz
on a server with amd64, 8 G RAM, acting as
On 01/01/2011 08:09 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
What I see:
- increased CPU load
- decreased L2 ARC hit rate, decreased SSD (ad[46]), therefore increased
hard disk load (IOPS graph)
...
Any ideas on what could cause these? I haven&#
On 01/02/2011 05:06 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/01/2011 13:18, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 12/16/2010 01:44 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
Link to the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/v28/stable-8-zfsv28-20101215.patch.xz
I've
On 01/01/2011 08:09 PM, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
What I see:
- increased CPU load
- decreased L2 ARC hit rate, decreased SSD (ad[46]), therefore increased
hard disk load (IOPS graph)
...
Any ideas on what could cause these? I haven&#
On 01/03/2011 10:35 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
After four days, the L2 hit rate is still hovering around 10-20
percents (was between 60-90), so I think it's clearly a regression in
the ZFSv28 patch...
And the massive growth in CPU usage can also very nicely be seen...
I've updated the graph
Hi,
I have some recursive nameservers, running unbound and 7.2-STABLE #0:
Wed Sep 2 13:37:17 CEST 2009 on a bunch of HP BL460c machines (bce
interfaces).
These work OK.
During the process of migrating to 8.x, I've upgraded one of these
machines to 8.0-STABLE #25: Tue Mar 9 18:15:34 CET 201
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 03:22:04PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have some recursive nameservers, running unbound and 7.2-STABLE #0:
>> Wed Sep 2 13:37:17 CEST 2009 on a bunch of HP BL460c machines (bce
>> interfaces)
Hi,
Michael Loftis wrote:
>
>
> --On Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:22 PM +0100 Attila Nagy
> wrote:
>
> <...>
>> Both unbound and python accepts DNS requests, and it seems when 25%
>> interrupt happens, only unbound is in *udp state, where it is 50%, both
&g
Mike Tancsa wrote:
> At 11:39 AM 3/25/2010, Michael Loftis wrote:
>> --On Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:22 PM +0100 Attila Nagy
>> wrote:
>>
>> <...>
>>> Both unbound and python accepts DNS requests, and it seems when 25%
>>> interrupt happens, o
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:57:59PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Michael Loftis wrote:
>>
>>> --On Thursday, March 25, 2010 3:22 PM +0100 Attila Nagy
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> <...>
>>
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:21:42PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
>
>> Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:57:59PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>
Jonathan Feally wrote:
> Attila Nagy wrote:
>>>>>> Bingo, this solved the problem. The current uptime nears four days.
>>>>>> Previously I couldn't go further than a day.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The machine gets very light TCP
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 05:57:45PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
>
>> Jonathan Feally wrote:
>>
>>> Attila Nagy wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Bingo, this solved the problem. The current uptime nears fou
Hello,
I have some jails running on ZFS, so I have to mount devfs's into them.
For this purpose, I have some similar lines in /etc/fstab:
devfs /pool/jail/ldap/dev devfs rw 0 0
Where /pool is a ZFS filesystem.
This has worked until today -when I upgraded from a previou
On 2008.03.28. 23:59, Vince wrote:
Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
I have some jails running on ZFS, so I have to mount devfs's into them.
For this purpose, I have some similar lines in /etc/fstab:
devfs /pool/jail/ldap/dev devfs rw 0 0
Where /pool is a ZFS files
Hi,
I have a Sun X4540 with LSI C1068E based SAS controllers (FW version:
1.27.02.00-IT).
My problem is if one drive starts to fail with read errors, the machine
becomes completely unusable (running stable/9 with ZFS), because -it
seems- ZFS can't see that there are read errors on a device, th
Hi,
I've just tried to upgrade a machine running an older 8-stable to
9-stable@r242549M without success.
It runs an apache with mod_fcgid in a jail and the latter can't start
with the error message of:
[Sun Nov 04 16:09:12 2012] [emerg] (78)Function not implemented:
mod_fcgid: Can't create sha
change the above to:
jail_jailname_parameters="allow.sysvipc=1"
ps: it's not related to 9, stable/8 rc.d/jail has the same new style
jail invocation and hence the same problem.
On 11/04/2012 07:47 PM, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hi,
I've just tried to upgrade a machine running an older 8-stab
Hello,
I have a strange error on FreeBSD 7-STABLE (compiled on 7th May, just
few commits after the release, but an earlier kernel did the same).
I'm doing several parallel rsyncs from a machine to another (let's call
them source and destination). The source contains maildirs, so there are
so
Hello,
I've also ran into it, it's a pretty "killer" feature. :-O
Any chance for us on the fix?
Thanks,
Kip Macy wrote:
The flags checks are too strict. File a PR. I'll fix it when I get to
it. Sorrry.
-Kip
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Mike Andrews wrote:
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Mike
atapi_dma sysctl instead.
------
Attila Nagye-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Budapest Polytechnic (BMF.HU) @work: +361 210 1415 (194)
H-1084 Budapest, Tavaszmezo u. 15-17. cell.: +3630 306 6758
To Unsubscr
ses sendfile() to
transfer data (the easiest to try is the webfsd from the ports tree). It
will send garbage, collected from various places from your harddrive.
------
Attila Nagye-mail: [EMAIL PR
27;s going on in the
kernel, I will gladly provide console (serial) access to a machine which
has two fxp NICs and is connected to a FEC aware switch.
Any takers?
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMA
41 matches
Mail list logo
